Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bone Joint J ; 98-B(10): 1406-1409, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27694597

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We present an audit comparing our level I major trauma centre's data for a cohort of patients with hip fractures in the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) with locally held data on these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2036 records for episodes between July 2009 and June 2014 were reviewed. RESULTS: The demographics of nine patients were recorded incorrectly. The rate of incorrect data in operation codes was most significant with overall accuracy of 0.637 (95% CI 0.615 to 0.658). The sensitivity of NHFD coding ranged from 0.250 to 1.000 and the specificity 0.879 to 0.999. The recording of cementation had a sensitivity of 0.932 and specificity of 0.713. The recording of total hip arthroplasty had a sensitivity of 0.739 and specificity of 0.983. The overall accuracy of mortality data was 0.942 (95% CI 0.931 to 0.952), with sensitivity of 0.967 and specificity of 0.419. CONCLUSION: This paper highlights the need for local audit of the integrity of data uploaded to the NHFD. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1406-9.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Female , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...