Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
3.
Int J Infect Dis ; 10(4): 326-33, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16678467

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Point prevalence studies are useful in revealing the prevalence of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and community-acquired infections (CAIs). Such information allows prioritization of infection control resources and aids in overall hospital expenditure cut-backs. METHODS: A one-day point prevalence survey was conducted on May 19, 2003 at the King Fahad National Guard Hospital in Riyadh. Since the survey included HAIs and CAIs all patients were included. Data were collected on the underlying diagnosis, infection if present and whether it was hospital-acquired or community-acquired. We identified the presence of a line-associated blood stream infection (BSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) or a surgical site infection (SSI) based on the United States National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) definitions. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-two inpatients were included in the survey. There were 38 patients with 45 (8.0%) HAIs and 76 (13.5%) patients with a CAI. Of the HAIs, 31.1% had a line-related BSI, while 28.9% and 24.4% had a VAP and catheter-related UTI, respectively. Most of the HAIs took place in the intensive care units (ICU) (21 (46.7%)), followed by the medical and surgical wards with six (13.3%) cases in each ward. For all HAIs there was a 12.7-fold increased risk with a hospital stay exceeding eight days (OR: 12.7, CI 3.2-50.6). Most of the 76 CAIs were admitted to the medical ward with community-acquired pneumonia (34.9%) as the most common diagnosis. Among the 89 pathogens isolated, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common (21.3%) followed by Enterococcus spp (16.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of HAIs in our hospital was 8%, with significant risk factors including a hospital stay exceeding eight days. A device-related infection was more likely in a patient with a venous or bladder catheter in place for more than eight days, or a patient mechanically ventilated for more than eight days. Catheter-related UTIs were identified as an important source of infection, requiring ongoing surveillance.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospitals , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospital Units , Humans , Infant , Infection Control , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 33(3): 182-8, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15798674

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Burkholderia cepacia, a gram-negative pathogen, has been a known cause of hospital outbreaks because of a contaminated common source such as multidose medications. We describe an outbreak with Burkholderia cepacia infection in 2 major hospitals affiliated to the National Guard, related to an intrinsic contamination of a locally manufactured, multidose Albuterol nebulization solution (Tabouk Pharmaceutical Company, Tabouk, Saudi Arabia) and we report the interventions taken to interrupt this outbreak. METHODS: During the outbreak period between May 2003 and March 2004, a combined prospective surveillance and a retrospective chart and microbiologic data review were conducted in 4 major hospitals affiliated to the National Guard. Microbiologic cultures were also performed on environmental objects of concern, as well as certain medications. In addition, a questionnaire was distributed to the respiratory therapy staff to evaluate the process of administering respiratory medications and their adherence to sound infection control practices. RESULTS: An intrinsic contamination of a locally manufactured brand of multidose Albuterol nebulization with B cepacia was identified. Two of the 4 hospitals were found to be involved: hospital A a 700-bed tertiary care center and Hospital B a 150-bed hospital. A total of 2121 patients were exposed to Albuterol nebulization as inpatients at hospital A and 318 as outpatients. For hospital B, a total of 283 inpatients and 34 outpatients were exposed to the Albuterol nebulization. Forty and 12 patients, from hospital A and hospital B, respectively, were found to have at least 1 positive culture for B cepacia. From hospital A, most samples were respiratory, and, from hospital B, most were from blood. Molecular typing of 34 available isolates showed that 23 cases were of a single strain of B cepacia that matched the strain isolated from the 3 different batches of multidose Albuterol nebulization. Three culture-positive patients never received Albuterol nebulization of that brand but were in the same room of a patient who had been receiving the medication. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a large outbreak of B cepacia in 2 major hospitals affiliated with the National Guard, linked to an intrinsic contamination of a multidose Albuterol nebulization solution. During the period of prospective surveillance, only a few cases were identified as a result of nosocomial transmission. Immediate notification of the Ministry of Health and withdrawal of the medication and revisiting the respiratory therapy practices were necessary to halt this outbreak.


Subject(s)
Burkholderia Infections/epidemiology , Burkholderia cepacia/isolation & purification , Disease Outbreaks , Drug Contamination , Adolescent , Adult , Aerosols , Aged , Albuterol , Carrier State , Child , Drug Packaging , Female , Hospitals, Military , Humans , Infant , Infection Control/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 31(4): 237-42, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12806362

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the presence or absence of international variation in central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection (BSI) rates and to examine associated infection control practices that might underlie the differences. DESIGN: The Evaluation of Processes and Indicators in Infection Control (EPIC) study was conducted as a prospective surveillance study. SETTINGS: The study took place in intensive care units (ICUs) from 14 countries, which were from the Asian Pacific (3), Europe (7), Middle East (2), and South America (2), in addition to 41 US hospitals. METHODS: We compared the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance catheter-associated BSI rate between the non-US and US units. We also compared the following organization factors between the 2 groups: hospital factors (ownership, average daily census of patients); ICU type (medical vs surgical); number of beds; and infection control-related factors (number of staff, number of hours spent on study ICU surveillance, years of experience, number of inservice sessions on line infection, number of blood cultures drawn/1000 patients). RESULTS: We found no significant difference in catheter-associated BSI rates between non-US and US hospitals (5.02 +/- 0.75 vs 3.82 +/- 0.42/1000 days, respectively; P =.27). Non-US hospitals were more likely to be government-owned (10/14 vs 7/41;P <.001) and to have larger daily patient census (795 +/- 84 vs 276 +/- 47 patients; P <.001). There was no difference in ICU type or number of beds. Infection control committees were present in all US and non-US hospitals. No significant differences were found in the number of staff involved in surveillance in the study ICU, years of experience, hours spent on surveillance, or the provision of inservices on line care. The use of barriers during line insertion also did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter-associated BSIs in patients in the ICU were not significantly different between non-US and US hospitals. All hospitals had infection control committees, and there were no significant differences in time spent and numbers of persons involved in ICU surveillance activities. These findings suggest that many aspects of the standards of care do not differ between the 2 groups.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Asia/epidemiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/etiology , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Intensive Care Units/standards , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Middle East/epidemiology , South America/epidemiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , United States/epidemiology
7.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 21(2): 212-3, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12615389

ABSTRACT

To outline a plan for the expansion of travel medicine programmes and discipline in the mid eastern region, a panel of travel medicine experts convened at the First International Conference on Travel Medicine in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to present and discuss the risks, prevention strategies, and treatment methods for the myriad of travel-related health issues. During some formal and informal discussions, suggestions were put forth and strategies outlined on how to expand programmes for travel medicine and promote its discipline in the region. Expanding and/or developing programmes of any nature is not without its challenges. In this light, the cooperation and commitment of the appropriate government sectors and significant others must be established to ensure success.


Subject(s)
Travel , Government Agencies , Humans , International Cooperation , Preventive Medicine , Public Health , Risk Factors , Saudi Arabia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...