ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Although graft loss remains the biggest challenge for all pediatric kidney transplant (KT) recipients, unique challenges exist within different age groups. We aim to evaluate the different characteristics and graft survival outcomes of young children and adolescents undergoing KT. METHODS: Children who underwent isolated KT between 2000 and 2013 at our institution were included in this retrospective analysis. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared using student's t-test, chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of 73 children who underwent KT, 31 were <12 (young children), and 42 were ≥ 12 years old (adolescents). Overall patient survival was 100%. The younger group had superior 5-year (100% vs. 75.5%) and 10-year (94.4% vs. 43.8%) graft survival (p=0.008). Factors predictive of poor graft survival on multivariate analysis were older age at transplantation (HR 1.2, CI 1-1.4, p=0.047), female gender (HR 9.0, CI 1.9-43, p=0.006), and acute rejection episodes (HR 13, CI 2-90, p=0.008). The most common causes of graft loss were acute and chronic rejection episodes and immunosuppression nonadherence. CONCLUSION: Adolescents undergoing KT have inferior graft survival compared to younger children. In adjusted modeling, children with older age, female gender, and acute rejection episodes have inferior graft survival.
Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/etiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Sex FactorsSubject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Blood Pressure Determination , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Early Diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Needs Assessment , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Probability , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Gingival overgrowth usually characterized by increased cellular growth of gingival fibroblasts appears to be multifactorial. In patients receiving CyA for more than 3 months, the incidence can approach 70% and can be attributed to pharmaceutical immunosuppression. Case reports have reported regression of overgrowth with both metronidazole and azithromycin. The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of metronidazole and azithromycin in reducing CyA-induced gingival overgrowth. Twenty-five patients were included in this double-blinded randomized study. All patients were receiving CyA as medically indicated and diagnosed with gingival overgrowth by a dentist. Patients were randomized to receive either 5-days of azithromycin or 7-days of metronidazole given at baseline only. The extent of gingival overgrowth was measured at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 wk. Fourteen patients at CCF and 11 patients at CCHMC were studied. Repeated measures anova was performed to assess differences within and between groups. Gingival overgrowth at baseline was not statistically different between groups. The mean degree of gingival overgrowth after treatment was different across all time intervals (p = 0.0049) showing azithromycin to be more effective than metronidazole. Therapy with azithromycin offers an effective alternative to the management of CyA-induced gingival overgrowth.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Gingival Overgrowth/chemically induced , Gingival Overgrowth/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Antihypertensive medications are used extensively in children despite a paucity of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. This study was among the first randomized, controlled pediatric antihypertensive medication trials, in which the combination drug bisoprolol fumarate/hydrochlorothiazide (B/HT) was compared with placebo. The study comprised a 2-week single-blind placebo screening period, a 6-week double-blind dose titration period, a 4-week double-blind dose maintenance period, and a 2-week double-blind dose-tapering period. One hundred and forty subjects were enrolled to achieve 94 randomized subjects treated either with B/HT ( n=62) or placebo ( n=32). B/HT induced significant reductions compared with placebo for average sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) (9.3 vs. 4.9 mmHg, P<0.05) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) (7.2 vs. 2.7 mmHg, P<0.05). The placebo-subtracted BP reductions were greater in younger children and those with more-severe baseline hypertension. The percentage of subjects with BP less than the 90th percentile at study completion was 45% for B/HT and 34% for placebo ( P=NS). Although the study demonstrated that B/HT reduced BP safely compared with placebo, the large placebo effect and failure of most subjects to achieve target BP control make it uncertain whether B/HT is appropriate first-line therapy for pediatric hypertension, particularly in adolescents with mild-to-moderate BP elevation.
