Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Chongqing Medicine ; (36): 1054-1056, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-515057

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the pregnancy outcome and delivery method after different cervical treatment.Methods A total of 249 primipara (research group)following the different cervical treatment before pregnancy were divided into operative group (97 cases)and physiotherapy group (152 cases)according to the type of cervical treatment.250 primipara (control group) of the same period had not undergone the cervical treatment.All patients were delivered in maternal and child health care hospital of H ubei province from June 2012 to June 2015.The rates of cesarean section,the preterm delivery,premature rupture of membranes,the duration of labor,neonatal weight were compared between the groups.Resnlts (1) In the research group,the rates of cesarean section (65.86%),the risk of the preterm delivery(13.65 %),premature rupture of membranes(20.48 %),were significantly higher than control group(x2 =18.428,10.452,8.066,P<0.01).The neonatal weight of research group (3 360.714-517.08)g was lower in comparison with that of control group(x2=2.459,P<0.05).(2)The rates of cesarean section of operative group and physiotherapy group was 76.28% and 59.21% (P<0.05).The premature rupture of membranes 28.87% and 15.13% in each group (P<0.05).(3) The labor duration of operative group (7.18 ± 2.97) h,physiotherapy group(7.27-4-3.17) h.and control group (7.71±2.88)h has no significant difference (x2 =0.915,0.790,0.143,P>0.05).Conclusion cervical treatment increases the rates of cesarean section,the risk of preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes.But there was no effect on the duration labor of various types of cervical treatment.

2.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-400296

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the clinical character and treatment method of the coexistence of cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis.Method Twenty-seven cases with coexistence of cervical and lum bar spinal stenosis,9 cases with single cervical operation,7 cases with single lumbar operation,11 combined cervical and lumbar operation.Results Twenty-two cases were followed-up,average 49 months,all eases were recorded with JOA score.JOA score was(8.6±0.2)scores preoperafion,(11.7±0.3)scores 2 weeks postoperation,(13.1±0.2)scores 3 months postoperation,(13.5±0.2)scores 6 months postoperation,(13.9±0.3)scores 12 months postoperation.Relief rate was 79.2%,satisfactory rate was 93.8%.Conclusions The patient with multi-segment spinal stenosis should be treated individually,to certain responsible focus.If no responsible focus,it is better to treat with cervical spinal operation first.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...