The Current Status of Concussion Assessment Scales: A Critical Analysis Review.

¼: Concussion is a complex pathophysiologic process that affects the brain; it is induced by biomechanical forces, with alteration in mental status with or without loss of consciousness. ¼: Concussion assessment tools may be broadly categorized into (1) screening tests such as the SAC (Standardized Assessment of Concussion), the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System), and the King-Devick (KD) test; (2) confirmatory tests including the SCAT (Sport Concussion Assessment Tool), the ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing), and the VOMS (Vestibular Oculomotor Screening); and (3) objective examinations such as brain network activation (BNA) analysis, imaging studies, and physiologic markers. ¼: The KD, child SCAT3 (cSCAT3), child ImPACT (cImPACT), and VOMS tests may be used to evaluate for concussion in the pediatric athlete. ¼: Future work with BNA, functional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and serum biomarkers may provide more objective assessment of concussion, neurologic injury, and subsequent recovery.

Evaluating the role of graft integrity on outcomes: clinical and imaging results following superior capsular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) addresses massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears in young patients. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate clinical outcomes and graft integrity in patients following SCR. METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients undergoing SCR by 2 surgeons with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Functional outcomes were obtained, including Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), visual analog scale (VAS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Graft integrity was evaluated on magnetic resonance images (MRIs). RESULTS: Thirty-five shoulders in 34 patients were identified. Four patients underwent subsequent surgery. The mean preoperative scores were SST 21.6 ± 17.6, ASES 28.3 ± 10.1, SANE 50.6 ± 22.1, and VAS 6.6 ± 1.7. The mean postoperative outcomes were SST 79.1 ± 19.6, ASES 79.9 ± 17.4, SANE 74.3 ± 18.7, and VAS 1.5 ± 2.2. There was statistically significant improvement in SST, ASES, and VAS following SCR. MRI revealed graft failure in 62% (n = 13 of 21) of shoulders. Radiographic evidence of graft healing did not have any effect on SST, ASES, SANE, or VAS scores. CONCLUSION: Given the high rate of graft failure without a significant difference in clinical outcomes, graft healing after SCR might not be an independent predictor of success. The improved clinical improvement in patients undergoing SCR may be due to other known beneficial aspects of the procedure, including partial rotator cuff repair, débridement, and biceps management.

Wearable Performance Devices in Sports Medicine.

CONTEXT: Wearable performance devices and sensors are becoming more readily available to the general population and athletic teams. Advances in technology have allowed individual endurance athletes, sports teams, and physicians to monitor functional movements, workloads, and biometric markers to maximize performance and minimize injury. Movement sensors include pedometers, accelerometers/gyroscopes, and global positioning satellite (GPS) devices. Physiologic sensors include heart rate monitors, sleep monitors, temperature sensors, and integrated sensors. The purpose of this review is to familiarize health care professionals and team physicians with the various available types of wearable sensors, discuss their current utilization, and present future applications in sports medicine. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Data were obtained from peer-reviewed literature through a search of the PubMed database. Included studies searched development, outcomes, and validation of wearable performance devices such as GPS, accelerometers, and physiologic monitors in sports. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. RESULTS: Wearable sensors provide a method of monitoring real-time physiologic and movement parameters during training and competitive sports. These parameters can be used to detect position-specific patterns in movement, design more efficient sports-specific training programs for performance optimization, and screen for potential causes of injury. More recent advances in movement sensors have improved accuracy in detecting high-acceleration movements during competitive sports. CONCLUSION: Wearable devices are valuable instruments for the improvement of sports performance. Evidence for use of these devices in professional sports is still limited. Future developments are needed to establish training protocols using data from wearable devices.