ABSTRACT
Vitamin B12 deficiency is emerging as a growing public health problem. The most commonly used diagnostic tests are limited in accuracy, sensitivity, and are non-specific for B12 deficiency. The aim of this study was to develop a simple B12 breath test (BBT) to more accurately evaluate vitamin B12 status as an alternative to the most common diagnostic test, serum B12 levels. The breath test is based on the metabolism of sodium 1-(13)C-propionate to (13)CO(2) which requires B12 as a cofactor. We initially compared the BBT to current B12 diagnostic methods in 58 subjects. Subjects also received a second BBT 1-3 days after initial testing to evaluate reproducibility of results. Propionate dosage, fasting times, and collection periods were compared, respectively. The dose of sodium 1-(13)C-propionate (10-50 mg) gave equivalent results while an 8 h fast was essential. Statistical analysis revealed that breath collection times could be reduced to just a baseline and 10 and 20 min following propionate dosing. We also measured the incidence of B12 deficiency with the BBT in 119 patients with chronic pancreatitis, Crohn's disease, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, and subjects over 65 years of age. The BBT results agreed with previous publications showing a higher incidence of B12 deficiency in these patients. The BBT may provide clinicians with a non-invasive, accurate, reliable, and reproducible diagnostic test to detect vitamin B12 deficiency.
Subject(s)
Breath Tests/methods , Public Health , Vitamin B 12 Deficiency/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carbon Isotopes , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Florida/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Vitamin B 12 Deficiency/epidemiology , Vitamin B 12 Deficiency/metabolism , Young AdultABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Chronic abdominal pain is the most difficult management issue in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Recently, a long-acting depo-formulated version of octreotide has been developed that can be given as a once monthly intramuscular injection, Octreotide LAR(R) (O-LAR) rather than as a thrice daily subcutaneous injection (octreotide short-acting, O-SA). OBJECTIVE: To see if O-LAR is similar in efficacy to O-SA in the treatment of painful chronic pancreatitis in a small open-label, unblinded pilot study. PATIENTS: Seven advanced chronic pancreatitis patients with daily, severe abdominal pain who had previously responded to O-SA were recruited from the pancreas clinics of the University of Florida and monitored for one month on O-SA and for four months while on O-LAR. Each patient served as his/her own control as this was a paired data set. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) Daily VAS scores; 2) daily morphine equivalents; 3) monthly health related quality of life chronic pancreatitis surveys; 4) daily diaries of work/pleasurable activities missed or hospitalization/Emergency Department visits. RESULTS: Average daily VAS scores for patients during O-SA therapy were 4.50+/-2.28 and during the fourth month of O-LAR therapy, 3.86+/-2.11, difference -0.64+/-0.80 (P=0.078). Average daily morphine equivalents were not dissimilar at 124.3+/-177.3 mg during O-SA therapy and 131.6+/-194.3 mg during O-LAR therapy; difference 7.3+/-17.5 mg P=0.310. Health related quality of life chronic pancreatitis scores were not significantly changed when moving from O-SA to O-LAR. Adverse events were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Octreotide LAR(R) may be a reasonable substitute for tid octreotide in treating chronic pancreatitis pain. Further, larger studies would be useful to better characterize the role of Octreotide LAR(R) in the management of chronic pancreatitis pain.
