Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ir Med J ; 114(7): 404, 2021 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520522

ABSTRACT

Aims In this novel study in the Irish setting, we quantified the number items managed per General Practitioner (GP) consult, how each item is managed, and impact on a GP's job satisfaction. Methods Participating GPs at two surgeries completed a questionnaire - integrated into the practice management software - after each consultation that satisfied the inclusion criteria during a four-week period. Results Due to feasibility constraints, 500 of 857 (58.3%) completed questionnaires were randomly selected for our sample. GPs manage an average of 1.76 items per consultation. Older patients presented with more items. Greater number of presenting items led to less being managed on the day 71% (n=5) for 5 items vs. 95.2% (n= 246) for 1 item, longer consultation duration (mean = 14.63 minutes (4-45) and decreased GP satisfaction, mean 8/10 (2-10). Conclusion Increasing the number of items in a GP consultation has a statistically significant effect on duration of consultation, how each item is managed, and even GP satisfaction.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Personal Satisfaction , Referral and Consultation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workload
2.
Ir J Med Sci ; 187(3): 669-674, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29098515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ireland is on course to become the most obese country in Europe by 2025. A recently published action plan for obesity in Ireland identifies primary care as one of the best places to tackle this issue. AIM: This study aims to assess patients' attitudes towards weight loss management in general practice in Ireland. DESIGN AND SETTING: A descriptive study was conducted at one urban single-handed and one rural group practice in the south west of Ireland. METHOD: The study is a quantitative cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: The response rate was 18.72% in the rural and 22.8% in the urban practice. Thirty-three percent of patients underestimated their BMI. Sixty-four percent of overweight and 39% of obese patients said their general practitioner (GP) had never discussed their weight with them. Eighty-five percent of overweight and 68% of obese patients were never told their weight might be affecting their health. Only 19% of obese patients had been referred to a weight loss service. Eighty-seven percent of respondents felt their GP would be a good person to advise them. The main reasons patients felt that their weight was not addressed include patients themselves only wanting to discuss the issue they came with and they also felt that time pressure was stopping GPs. CONCLUSION: Overweight or obese patients are more likely to underestimate their BMI. GPs are not discussing weight management with patients who would benefit the most. There is a poor referral rate to weight loss services. Patients are happy to discuss their weight with their GP but are aware that time management is an issue in their consultations.


Subject(s)
General Practice/standards , Weight Loss/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Ireland , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...