A review of immune checkpoint blockade in breast cancer.

In the recent years characterized by the cancer immunotherapy revolution, attention has turned to how to potentially boost and/or generate an efficient anti-tumor immune response in breast cancer (BC). Clinical activity of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 in BC has been more evident in the triple negative subtype and in earlier lines of the treatment. Remarkably, some responders to single agent ICB have achieved durable responses with metastatic disease, possibly as a result of treatment-induced immunological memory. However, most BC are immunologically quiescent and current research efforts developing ICB combinations are attempting to convert "cold" into "hot" tumors by manipulating the tumor microenvironment, expanding anti-tumor T cells improving efficient antigen presentation, and suppressing pro-tumor inhibitory cells. The aim of this review is to summarize existing data on the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockers as single agents and combination strategies in all BC subtypes, highlighting the BC subgroups that benefit most from ICB.

Hospital admission of cancer patients: avoidable practice or necessary care?

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are frequently admitted to hospital due to acute conditions or refractory symptoms. This occurs through the emergency departments and requires medical oncologists to take an active role. The use of acute-care hospital increases in the last months of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We aimed to describe the admissions to a medical oncology inpatient service within a 16-month period with respect to patients and tumor characteristics, and the outcome of the hospital stay. RESULTS: 672 admissions of 454 patients were analysed. The majority of admissions were urgent (74.1%), and were due to uncontrolled symptoms (79.6%). Among the chief complaints, dyspnoea occurred in 15.7%, pain in 15.2%, and neurological symptoms in 14.5%. The majority of the hospitalizations resulted in discharge to home (60.6%); in 26.5% the patient died and in 11.0% was transferred to a hospice. Admissions due to symptoms correlated with a longer hospital stay and a higher incidence of in-hospital death. CONCLUSION: We suggest that hospital use is not necessarily a sign of inappropriately aggressive care: inpatient care is probably an unavoidable step in the cancer trajectory. Optimization of inpatient supportive procedures should be a specific task of modern medical oncology.

Pyrosequencing evaluation of low-frequency KRAS mutant alleles for EGF receptor therapy selection in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

AIM: To evaluate whether pyrosequencing (PS) improves the KRAS mutational status predictive value. PATIENTS & METHODS: A retrospective analysis of KRAS mutations by PS and direct sequencing (DS) in 192 metastatic colorectal carcinomas (mCRCs), subgrouped in 51 KRAS mutated at PS and 141 KRAS wild-type at DS. RESULTS: DS failed to detect low-frequency KRAS mutations in four out of 51 mCRCs, whereas PS detected 12 additional low-frequency KRAS mutations in 141 mCRCs KRAS wild-type at DS. After reanalyzing by PS 97 KRAS wild-type tumors treated with anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) antibodies, nine additional mutations were revealed in nonresponders, whereas none of responders exhibited a KRAS-mutated genotype. Of note, KRAS-mutated tumors upon PS showed a worst progression-free survival after EGFR therapy. Finally, PS allowed the detection of additional NRAS, BRAF and exon 20 PIK3CA mutations mostly in KRAS wild-type mCRCs resistant to EGFR therapy. CONCLUSION: PS detection of low-frequency mutations may improve the KRAS predictive value for EGFR therapy selection.