Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e051781, 2022 Feb 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35121599

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated a novel early childhood development (ECD) programme integrated it into the primary healthcare system. SETTING: The intervention was implemented in a rural district of Lesotho from 2017 to 2018. PARTICIPANTS: It targeted primary caregivers during routine postnatal care visits and through village health worker home visits. INTERVENTION: The hybrid care delivery model was adapted from a successful programme in Lima, Peru and focused on parent coaching for knowledge about child development, practicing contingent interaction with the child, parent social support and encouragement. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: We compared developmental outcomes and caregiving practices in a cohort of 130 caregiver-infant (ages 7-11 months old) dyads who received the ECD intervention, to a control group that did not receive the intervention (n=125) using a case-control study design. Developmental outcomes were evaluated using the Extended Ages and Stages Questionnaire (EASQ), and caregiving practices using two measure sets (ie, UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS), Parent Ladder). Group comparisons were made using multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for caregiver-level, infant-level and household-level demographic characteristics. RESULTS: At completion, children in the intervention group scored meaningfully higher across all EASQ domains, compared with children in the control group: communication (δ=0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.26), social development (δ=0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.8) and motor development (δ=0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.31). Caregivers in the intervention group also reported significantly higher adjusted odds of engaging in positive caregiving practices in four of six MICS domains, compared with caregivers in the control group-including book reading (adjusted OR (AOR): 3.77, 95% CI 1.94 to 7.29) and naming/counting (AOR: 2.05; 95% CI 1.24 to 3.71). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that integrating an ECD intervention into a rural primary care platform, such as in the Lesothoan context, may be an effective and efficient way to promote ECD outcomes.


Subject(s)
Child Development , Rural Population , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Lesotho , Primary Health Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...