Tortuous course of the vertebral artery and anterior cervical decompression: a cadaveric and clinical case study.

STUDY DESIGN: Both the cadaveric and clinical examples of anomalous vertebral artery courses are described. The incidence of this anomaly in the general population and recognition, complications, and treatment options for these patients when undergoing anterior cervical decompression are discussed. OBJECTIVES: Cadaveric study: In this study vertebral artery's course through the cervical spine in the adult population was analyzed. The relation between an abnormal vertebral artery course and surgical landmarks are described. Clinical study: Complications and alternative treatment methods for decompression in patients with the anomaly are described. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence of anomalous vertebral artery course is low, but failure to recognize a medially located vertebral artery may result in a life-threatening iatrogenic injury during decompression. Neither the relation between the vertebral arteries and the surgical landmarks nor the guidelines for decompression in the face of a tortuous vertebral artery have been well described. METHODS: Transverse foramens of the cervical spine were measured in 222 cadaveric spines. The measurements were taken describing the relation between transverse foramens and other surgical landmarks. Three patients with anomalies were identified in clinical practice. The complications and treatment options are identified in these patients. RESULTS: In the cadaveric specimens, a 2.7% incidence of tortuous vertebral artery course was identified. In these abnormal specimens, the transverse foramen was located an average of 0.14 mm medial to the joint of Luschka. In one patient, the abnormal course of the vertebral artery was recognized after laceration of the artery during a routine corpectomy. Anomalies in the other two patients were recognized before surgery, and the patients underwent modified anterior decompression by combining a discectomy at the anomalous level with a corpectomy at other levels. Vertebral artery ectasia is identifiable on axial magnetic resonance or computed tomographic images. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant vertebral artery is rare. Preoperative recognition and appropriate modification of anterior decompression can yield excellent clinical results without risking significant complications.

Augmentation of spinal arthrodesis with autologous bone marrow in a rabbit posterolateral spine fusion model.

STUDY DESIGN: Posterolateral spinal fusion with autologous bone marrow aspirate in addition to autograft iliac crest bone graft in a rabbit model. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that the addition of autologous bone marrow can have positive effects on bone formation and spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Bone marrow has been shown to contain osteoprogenitor cells. A number of studies have demonstrated that bone formation is possible with autologous marrow injection into orthotopic sites such as that performed in femur fracture models. METHODS: A bone paucity model of posterolateral spine fusion was developed. The control animals received 0.8 g of morselized autogenous iliac crest bone graft harvested from a single iliac crest. The graft was mixed with 2 mL of clotted peripheral blood. In the experimental group, 2 mL of bone marrow aspirated from the opposite iliac crest was substituted for the peripheral blood clot. All rabbits were killed at 12 weeks, and the specimens were subjected to evaluation by posteroanterior radiography for the presence of fusion, computed tomography for bone volume, and biomechanical testing for stiffness. RESULTS: Successful fusion was achieved in 61% of the animals in the experimental group versus 25% in the control group (P < 0.05). The fusion mass in the experimental group had a mean volume of 919 +/- 387 mm3 versus 667 +/- 512 mm3 for the control group, as measured from computed tomography images. The results of the biomechanical testing validated the radiographic scoring system. The stiffness in specimens, graded as having a radiographic score of 4, was significantly greater than in specimens with radiographic scores of 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: In cases for which an adequate quantity of autogenous bone graft is not available, addition of bone marrow may facilitate greater bone formation and successful fusion.

Segmental variations of bone mineral density in the cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN: This study assessed the variability of segmental bone mineral density in the lower cervical spine (C4 through C7). A mean segmental bone mineral density value at each level was determined for all specimens, and a mean coefficient of variation among the 17 specimens was calculated. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the degree of intersegmental bone mineral density variations within cadaveric lower cervical spine segments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Bone mineral density studies in the thoracic and lumbar spine have shown a high degree of variability between spinal segments; however, the extent of segmental bone mineral density variability in the cervical spine is unknown. METHODS: Seventeen human cadaveric cervical spine specimens (C4 through C7) were scanned in a water bath using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in a lateral direction. Segmental bone mineral density of the vertebral bodies of all specimens were analyzed with respect to differences between segments within each specimen. RESULTS: The mean coefficient of segmental bone mineral density variations within each specimen for all spines was 14.8% (range, 5.8%-22.9%). Bone mineral density mean values and ranges at each level were as follows: C4, 0.720 g/cm2 (range, 0.367-1.161 g/cm2); C5, 0.784 g/cm2 (range, 0.348-1.268 g/cm2); C6, 0.735 g/cm2 (range 0.367-1.450 g/cm2); C7, 0.590 g/cm2 (range, 0.340-1.040 g/cm2). Paired analysis of difference between all levels for 16 specimens demonstrated the bone mineral density at the C7 level to be significantly lower than at all other levels (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data show that significant interlevel bone mineral density variability exists in the lower cervical spine, and suggests that random single segment bone mineral density sampling or mean specimen bone mineral density values may not be relevant.