Intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (prasterone), a highly efficient treatment of dyspareunia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on pain at sexual activity (dyspareunia) identified as the most bothersome symptom of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women at both screening and day 1. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial studied the effect of prasterone (DHEA) applied locally in the vagina on the severity of dyspareunia in 114 postmenopausal women who had identified dyspareunia as their most bothersome symptom of vaginal atrophy, while meeting the criteria for superficial cells ≤ 5% and pH > 5.0 at both screening and day 1. RESULTS: At the standard duration of 12 weeks of treatment, increasing doses of 0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% DHEA decreased the percentage of parabasal cells by 48.6  ±â€Š 6.78%, 42.4  ±  7.36% and 54.9  ±â€Š 6.60% (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo for all) with no change with placebo (p = 0.769). The effects on superficial cells and pH were also highly significant compared to placebo at all DHEA doses. The severity score of pain at sexual activity decreased by 0.5, 1.4, 1.6 and 1.4 units in the placebo and 0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% DHEA groups, respectively, with the p value of differences from placebo ranging from 0.0017 to < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Intravaginal DHEA, through local estrogen and androgen formation, causes a rapid and highly efficient effect on pain at sexual activity without systemic exposure of the other tissues, thus avoiding the recently reported systemic effects of estrogens.

Bioavailability and metabolism of oral and percutaneous dehydroepiandrosterone in postmenopausal women.

To study the bioavailability of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) administered by the oral and percutaneous routes, three groups of 12 postmenopausal women aged 60-70 years received two capsules of 50mg of DHEA orally before breakfast daily for 14 days or applied 4 g of a 10% DHEA cream or gel at the same time of the day on a 30 cm x 30 cm surface area on the thighs. Detailed serial blood sampling over 24h was performed following 1st and 14th DHEA administration for measurement of DHEA and nine of its metabolites by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Serum levels of estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) did not change following DHEA administration by any of the three formulations, while serum androstenedione (4-dione), testosterone, DHEA sulfate (DHEA-S), E(1)-S, androsterone glucuronide (ADT-G) and 3alpha-androstanediol-G (3alpha-diol-G), increased in all cases, the effect on these parameters being more important after oral than percutaneous administration due to the metabolism of DHEA into these metabolites in the gastrointestinal tract and liver. No qualitative differences in DHEA metabolism are observed between the oral and percutaneous routes of DHEA administration while the levels of all steroids remain on a plateau during the 24h period during chronic percutaneous DHEA administration. The present data show that DHEA is transformed into active androgens and estrogens in peripheral intracrine tissues with no or minimal release of the active steroids E(1), E(2) or testosterone in the circulation. Moreover, DHEA is preferentially transformed into androgens rather than into estrogens. Most importantly, the present data show that changes in serum DHEA following oral or percutaneous DHEA administration are not a valid parameter of DHEA action since the increase in serum DHEA is at least 100% greater than the increase in the formation of active androgens and estrogens and thus much higher than the potential physiological effects.

Evaluation of prostatic specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The 11,811 first visits and 46,751 annual follow-up visits performed since 1988 were analyzed in order to assess the efficacy of serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) for diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS: At first visit, screening included DRE and measurement of PSA using 3.0 ng/ml as upper limit of normal, demonstrated as optimal value in the course of the study. Transrectal echography of the prostate (TRUS) was performed only if PSA and/or DRE was abnormal. For elevated PSA, biopsy was performed only if PSA was above the value predicted from prostatic volume measured by TRUS. At follow-up visits, it was decided during the course of the study to use PSA alone. RESULTS: PSA was above 3.0 ng/ml in 16.6% and 15.6% of men at first and follow-up visits, respectively. Prostate cancer was found in 2.9% of men invited for screening at first visit and in only 0.4% of men at follow-up visits for a 7.1-fold decrease at follow-up visits done up to 11 years. PSA alone allowed to find 90.5% and 90. 0% of cancers at first and follow-up visits, respectively, compared to 41.1% and 25.0% by DRE alone. In the presence of normal PSA, 344 and 1,919 DREs are needed to find one prostate cancer at first and follow-up visits, respectively. A significant improvement in stage of the disease is found at follow-up (215 cancers) compared to first visits (337 cancers). Comparison made between men invited for screening and those who were not invited but screened showed no significant difference in terms of incidence and prevalence of prostate cancer as well as diagnosis of cancer as a function of age or as a function of PSA, DRE, and TRUS data. The cost for finding one case of prostate cancer is estimated at Can $2,420 and Can $7, 105 (first and follow-up visits, respectively, when PSA is used as prescreening). CONCLUSIONS: PSA used as prescreening and followed by DRE and TRUS when PSA is abnormal is highly efficient in detecting prostate cancer at a localized (potentially curable) stage since 99% of the cancers diagnosed were at such a localized stage, thus practically eliminating the diagnosis of metastatic and noncurable prostate cancer. The approach used is highly reliable, sensitive, efficient, and acceptable by the general population. The detection of clinically nonsignificant cancer is an exception.

EM-652 (SCH 57068), a third generation SERM acting as pure antiestrogen in the mammary gland and endometrium.

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women while it is the second cause of cancer death. Estrogens are well recognized to play the predominant role in breast cancer development and growth and much efforts have been devoted to the blockade of estrogen formation and action. The most widely used therapy of breast cancer which has shown benefits at all stages of the disease is the use of the antiestrogen Tamoxifen. This compound, however, possesses mixed agonist and antagonist activity and major efforts have been devoted to the development of compounds having pure antiestrogenic activity in the mammary gland and endometrium. Such a compound would avoid the problem of stimulation of the endometrium and the risk of endometrial carcinoma. We have thus synthesized an orally active non-steroidal antiestrogen, EM-652 (SCH 57068) and the prodrug EM-800 (SCH57050) which are the most potent of the known antiestrogens. EM-652 is the compound having the highest affinity for the estrogen receptor, including estradiol. It has higher affinity for the ER than ICI 182780, hydroxytamoxifen, raloxifene, droloxifene and hydroxytoremifene. EM-652 has the most potent inhibitory activity on both ER alpha and ER beta compared to any of the other antiestrogens tested. An important aspect of EM-652 is that it inhibits both the AF1 and AF2 functions of both ER alpha and ER beta while the inhibitory action of hydroxytamoxifen is limited to AF2, the ligand-dependent function of the estrogen receptors. AF1 activity is constitutive, ligand-independent and is responsible for mediation of the activity of growth factors and of the ras oncogene and MAP-kinase pathway. EM-652 inhibits Ras-induced transcriptional activity of ER alpha and ER beta and blocks SRC-1-stimulated activity of the two receptors. EM-652 was also found to block the recruitment of SRC-1 at AF1 of ER beta, this ligand-independent activation of AF1 being closely related to phosphorylation of the steroid receptors by protein kinase. Most importantly, the antiestrogen hydroxytamoxifen has no inhibitory effect on the SRC-1-induced ER beta activity while the pure antiestrogen EM-652 completely abolishes this effect, thus strengthening the need to use pure antiestrogens in breast cancer therapy in order to control all known aspects of ER-regulated gene expression. In fact, the absence of blockade of AF2 by hydroxytamoxifen could explain why the benefits of tamoxifen observed up to 5 years become negative at longer time intervals and why resistance develops to tamoxifen. EM-800, the prodrug of EM-652, has been shown to prevent the development of dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary carcinoma in the rat, a well-recognized model of human breast cancer. It is of interest that the addition of dehydroepiandrosterone, a precursor of androgens, to EM-800, led to complete inhibition of tumor development in this model. Not only the development, but also the growth of established DMBA-induced mammary carcinoma was inhibited by treatment with EM-800. An inhibitory effect was also observed when medroxyprogesterone was added to treatment with EM-800. Uterine size was reduced to castration levels in the groups of animals treated with EM-800. An almost complete disappearance of estrogen receptors was observed in the uterus, vaginum and tumors in nude mice treated with EM-800. EM-652 was the most potent antiestrogen to inhibit the growth of human breast cancer ZR-75-1, MCF-7 and T-47D cells in vitro when compared with ICI 182780, ICI 164384, hydroxytamoxifen, and droloxifene. Moreover, EM-652 and EM-800 have no stimulatory effect on the basal levels of cell proliferation in the absence of E2 while hydroxytamoxifen and droloxifene had a stimulatory effect on the basal growth of T-47D and ZR-75-1 cells. EM-652 was also the most potent inhibitor of the percentage of cycling cancer cells. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Prolonged neoadjuvant combined androgen blockade leads to a further reduction of prostatic tumor volume: three versus six months of endocrine therapy.

OBJECTIVES: In most clinical trials that have investigated the potential beneficial effects of neoadjuvant combined androgen blockade (CAB) in clinically localized prostate cancer, CAB has been given for 3 months, but no data are available on the influence of a longer duration of neoadjuvant CAB on the pathologic features of prostate cancer. METHODS: Prostatectomy specimens of 40 patients, randomized to 3 (n = 18) or 6 (n = 22) months of neoadjuvant CAB, were blindly evaluated with regard to tumor volume, pathologic stage, and surgical margins. The morphologically most vital tumor areas were investigated for nucleolar size and MIB-1 defined proliferative activity. RESULTS: The patients treated for 6 months had a median tumor volume 60% lower than the 3-month treatment group (P = 0.005). In the 6-month treatment group, no residual tumor could be found in 2 cases, but the proportion of prostatectomy specimens with seminal vesical invasion and positive surgical margins was not statistically different from that after 3 months. Compared with untreated controls, tumor proliferative activity assessed by MIB-1 immunoreactivity was significantly lower at 3 and 6 months of neoadjuvant CAB (P = 0.01). However, in 2 of 1 7 examined tumors that had been treated for 6 months, high MIB-1 scores suggested a development toward therapy-resistant cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged neoadjuvant CAB for 6 months leads to a further decrease in prostatic tumor volume compared with the findings after 3 months. In a few instances, residual tumor areas with substantial MIB-1 defined proliferative activity persist at 6 months, thus indicating that in at least some cases, despite the overall decrease in tumor size, cancer cells can continue the cell cycle under CAB.

Screening decreases prostate cancer death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The 46,193 men aged 45 to 80 years registered in the electoral roll of Quebec City and its Metropolitan area were randomized in November 1988 between screening and no screening in a study aimed of assessing the impact of prostate cancer screening on cause-specific death. METHODS: At first visit, screening included measurement of serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) using 3.0 ng/ml as upper limit of normal and a digital rectal examination (DRE). Transrectal echography of the prostate (TRUS) was performed only if PSA and/or DRE was abnormal and biopsy was then done, only if PSA was above the predicted PSA value. At follow-up visits, PSA alone was used as prescreening. RESULTS: 137 deaths due to prostate cancer occurred between 1989 and 1996, inclusively, in the 38,056 unscreened men while only 5 deaths were observed among the 8,137 screened individuals. The prostate cancer death rates during the eight-year period were 48.7 and 15 per 100,000 man-years in the unscreened and screened groups, respectively, for a 3.25 odds ratio in favor of screening and early treatment (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: If PSA screening is started at the age of 50 years (or 45 years in the higher risk population), annual or biannual PSA alone is highly efficient to identify the men who are at high risk of having prostate cancer. Coupled with treatment of localized disease, this approach demonstrates, for the first time, that early diagnosis and treatment permits a dramatic decrease in deaths from prostate cancer.

Long-Term Combined Androgen Blockade Alone for Localized Prostate Cancer.

The effect of long-term continuous combined androgen blockade (CAB) administered alone has been studied in 26 patients with stage B(2)/T(2) and 115 with stage C/T(3) prostate cancer who did not accept or were not candidates for other forms of therapy. In the 26 patients with stage T(2) disease who have received continuous CAB with an LHRH agonist and flutamide, progression of cancer, as evidenced by rising serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), was observed in only one patient receiving CAB, occurring after 7.3 years of continuous CAB treatment. Treatment with CAB was then stopped in 20 patients with stage T(2) cancer after a median period of 7.2 years. Failure or PSA rise occurred in 2 of these patients after a median follow-up of 3.1 years following cessation of CAB, and one died from prostate cancer. The benefits observed with CAB alone in localized disease compare favorably with those obtained by radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy alone. Twenty-six patients with stage T(3) cancer have been treated with CAB continuously for a median of 9.9 years. After a median follow-up of 4.4 years (range 0.3-7.0 years) after cessation of CAB in this group of patients, PSA failure was observed in 5 patients (19%), who had been treated continuously for 3.8, 5.0, 5.0, 9.9, and 10.9 years. Thus, in 85% (39 of 46) patients with stage T(2)-T(3) disease who were treated continuously with CAB for a median of 7.2 and 9.9 years, respectively, PSA remained undetectable up to a median of 3.1 (stage T(2)) and 4.4 (stage T(3)) years of follow-up. The present data, while showing the high efficacy of CAB in localized prostate cancer, clearly indicate the need for long-term treatment, similar to the 5 years of tamoxifen required for control of breast cancer.

DHEA and the intracrine formation of androgens and estrogens in peripheral target tissues: its role during aging.

Human and some other primates are unique since their adrenals secrete large amounts of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfate (DHEA-S), which are converted into androstenedione (4-dione) and then into potent androgens and estrogens in peripheral tissues, therefore providing autonomous intracrine control to target tissues that can adjust the formation and metabolism of active sex steroids according to local requirements. Knowledge in this area has recently made rapid progress with the elucidation of the structure of most of the tissue-specific cDNAs and genes that encode the steroidogenic enzymes responsible for the transformation of these inactive precursor steroids into androgens and/or estrogens. It is estimated that 30 to 50% of total androgens in men are synthesized in peripheral intracrine tissues from inactive adrenal precursors while, in women, peripheral estrogen formation is even more important, the best estimate being 75% before menopause and 100% after menopause. The marked reduction in the formation of DHEA-S by the adrenals during aging, especially before the age of 50 years, results in a dramatic fall in the formation of active sex steroids in peripheral target tissues, a situation which is thought to be associated with a long series of age-related decreases such as insulin resistance, obesity, osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases, loss of muscle mass, cancer and other diseases. We have demonstrated for the first time a series of medically important beneficial effects of DHEA administered for 12 months to post-menopausal women. Most interestingly, the bone mineral density significantly increased. This relatively rapid change was associated with an increase in plasma osteocalcin, a marker of bone formation, while a decrease in bone resorption reflected by a decrease in urinary hydroxyproline excretion was observed in parallel. In addition, the estrogenic stimulation of vaginal cytology in the absence of any sign of stimulatory effect on the endometrium is also of potentially major interest for the prevention and management of menopause. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of DHEA on the growth of human breast cancer xenografts in vivo in nude mice supports the beneficial use of DHEA as hormone replacement therapy in women.

Effect of 12-month dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy on bone, vagina, and endometrium in postmenopausal women.

The effect of 12-month dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) replacement therapy has been evaluated in 14 60- to 70-yr-old women who received daily applications of a 10% DHEA cream. Vaginal epithelium maturation was stimulated by DHEA administration in 8 of 10 women who had a maturation value of zero at the onset of therapy, whereas a stimulatory effect was also seen in all three women who had an intermediate vaginal maturation index before therapy. The estrogenic effect of DHEA observed in the vagina was not observed in the endometrium, which remained atrophic in all women. Most interesting, the bone mineral density significantly increased at the hip from 0.744 +/- 0.021 to 0.759 +/- 0.025 g/cm2 after 12 months of treatment (P < 0.05). These changes in bone mineral density were associated with a significant 20.0% decrease (P < 0.01) in plasma bone alkaline phosphatase and a 28% decrease in the urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio. A 2.1-fold increase over the control value (P < 0.01) in plasma osteocalcin was concomitantly observed. The present data describe for the first time a series of medically important beneficial effects of DHEA therapy in postmenopausal women through transformation of the precursor steroid DHEA into androgens and/or estrogens in specific peripheral intracrine tissues without significant adverse effects. The stimulatory effect on the vaginal epithelium in the absence of stimulation of the endometrium is of particular interest because it eliminates the need for progestin replacement therapy. On the other hand, the stimulatory effect on bone mineral density accompanied by an increase in serum osteocalcin, a marker of bone formation, suggests stimulation of bone formation by the androgenic action of DHEA, a finding of particular interest for both the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Marked decline in serum concentrations of adrenal C19 sex steroid precursors and conjugated androgen metabolites during aging.

The present data show a dramatic decline in the circulating levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), DHEA-sulfate (DHEA-S), androst-5-ene-3 beta,17 beta-diol (5-diol), 5-diol-sulfate, 5-diol-fatty acid esters, and androstenedione in both men and women between the ages of 20-80 yr. In the 50- to 60-yr-old group, serum DHEA decreased by 74% and 70% from its peak values in 20- to 30-yr-old men and women, respectively. the serum concentrations of the conjugated metabolites of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), namely androsterone (ADT)-G, androstane-3 alpha,17 beta-diol (3 alpha-diol-G), androstane-3 beta,17 beta-diol (3 beta-diol-G), and ADT-sulfate are the most reliable parameters of the total androgen pool in both men and women, whereas serum testosterone and DHT can be used as markers of testicular secretion in men and interstitial ovarian secretion in women. The serum concentration of these various conjugated androgen metabolites decreased by 40.8% to 72.8% between the 20- to 30-yr-old and 70- to 80-yr-old age groups in men and women, respectively, thus suggesting a parallel decrease in the total androgen pool with age. As estimated by measurement of the circulating levels of these conjugated metabolites of DHT, it is noteworthy that women produce approximately 66% of the total androgens found in men. In women, most of these androgens originate from the transformation of DHEA and DHEA-S into testosterone and DHT in peripheral intracrine tissues, whereas in men the testes and DHEA and DHEA-S provide approximately equal amounts of androgens at the age of 50-60 yr. An additional potentially highly significant observation is that the majority of the marked decline in circulating adrenal C19 steroids and their resulting androgen metabolites takes place between the age groups of 20- to 30-yr olds and 50- to 60-yr-olds, with smaller changes are observed after the age of 60 yr.

Physiological changes in dehydroepiandrosterone are not reflected by serum levels of active androgens and estrogens but of their metabolites: intracrinology.

This study analyzes in detail the serum concentration of the active androgens and estrogens, as well as a series of free and conjugated forms of their precursors and metabolites, after daily application for 2 weeks of 10 mL 20% dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) solution on the skin to avoid first passage through the liver. In men, DHEA administration caused 175%, 90%, 200% and 120% increases in the circulating levels of DHEA and its sulfate (DHEA-S), DHEA-fatty acid esters, and androst-5-ene-3 beta,17 beta-diol, respectively, with a return to basal values 7 days after cessation of the 14-day treatment. Serum androstenedione increased by approximately 80%, whereas serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) remained unchanged. In parallel with the changes in serum DHEA, the concentrations of the conjugated metabolites of DHT, namely androsterone glucuronide, androstane-3 alpha,17 beta-diol-G, and androstane-3 beta,17 beta-diol-G increased by about 75%, 50%, and 75%, respectively, whereas androsterone-sulfate increased 115%. No consistent change was observed in serum estrone (E1) or estradiol (E2) in men receiving DHEA, whereas serum E1-sulfate and E2-sulfate were slightly and inconsistently increased by about 20%, and serum cortisol and aldosterone concentrations were unaffected by DHEA administration. Almost superimposable results were obtained in women for most steroids except testosterone, which was about 50% increased during DHEA treatment. This increase corresponded to about 0.8 nM testosterone, an effect undetectable in men because they already have much higher (approximately 15 nM) basal testosterone levels. In women, the serum levels of the conjugated metabolites of DHT, namely androsterone glucuronide, androstane-3 alpha,17 beta-diol-G, androstane-3 beta,17 beta-diol-G, and androsterone-sulfate were increased by 125%, 140%, 120% and 150%, respectively. The present study demonstrates that the serum concentrations of testosterone, DHT, E1, and E2 are poor indicators of total androgenic and estrogenic activity. However, the esterified metabolites of DHT appear as reliable markers of the total androgen pool, because they directly reflect the intracrine formation of androgens in the tissues possessing the steroidogenic enzymes required to transform the inactive precursors DHEA and DHEA-S into DHT. As well demonstrated in women, who synthesize almost all their androgens from DHEA and DHEA-S, supplementation with physiological amounts of exogeneous DHEA permits the biosynthesis of androgens limited to the appropriate target tissues without leakage of significant amounts of active androgens into the circulation. This local or intracrine biosynthesis and action of androgens eliminates the inappropriate exposure of other tissues to androgens and thus minimizes the risks of undesirable masculinizing or other androgen-related side effects of DHEA.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: the Canadian experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of neoadjuvant combination therapy with the antiandrogen flutamide and a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist administered for 3 months before radical prostatectomy, compared with surgery alone in early stage prostate cancer on histopathologic findings at surgery and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). METHODS: A sample of 161 randomly screened patients diagnosed as having stage B (134 patients) or C (27 patients) prostate cancer were randomly assigned to radical prostatectomy alone or to 3 months of neoadjuvant combination therapy with the antiandrogen flutamide and an LHRH agonist before radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant combination therapy before radical prostatectomy decreased cancer-positive surgical margins from 33.8% in the control group to only 7.8%, thus leaving 92.2% of patients with negative margins at surgery. A net 54% improvement of staging was observed in favor of combination therapy. Organ-confined disease, on the other hand, increased from 49.3% to 77.8% of patients after 3 months of combination therapy, for a 57.8% increase in the incidence of organ-confined disease. No cancer was found in 6 (6.7%) prostatectomy specimens from the treated group. A close correlation was found between serum PSA at diagnosis and the stage of the disease at surgery. Upstaging increased from 30% at serum PSA values of 0 to 3.0 ng/mL up to 100% at serum PSA values above 15 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term follow-up of these patients is required to determine the impact on survival, the marked influence of neoadjuvant combination therapy on the stage of the disease suggests the possibility of a major improvement in the morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer.

Beneficial effect of combination hormonal therapy administered prior and following external beam radiation therapy in localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to investigate whether combined androgen blockade associated with radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer decreases at 12 and 24 months the rate of positive follow-up biopsies and serum PSA compared to radiation therapy alone. This is the report of an interim analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and twenty patients with clinical Stage B1-T2a, B2-T2b/T2c, and C-T3/T4, adenocarcinoma of the prostate were entered in a prospective randomized study. After written informed consent, the subjects were randomly allocated between external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone (group 1), 3 months of neoadjuvant combination therapy (LHRH-agonist + Flutamide) prior to EBRT (group 2), and a third group receiving combination therapy 3 months before, during, and 6 months after EBRT. There is no significant difference between the three groups concerning age, stage of disease, grade of tumor, and pretreatment PSA levels. Control transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsies (one core was taken from the initial cancer site regardless of the presence or absence of TRUS abnormalities) were done 12 and 24 months after the end of EBRT. Serum PSA measurements were done on schedule visits. RESULTS: Ninety-two and 68 patients underwent biopsies at 12 and 24 months, respectively, after the end of radiation therapy. While 62% of control patients at 12 months in Group 1 disclosed residual neoplasm, only 30% and 4% showed residual disease in groups 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.00005). When looking at 24 months, 65, 28, and 5% showed residual cancer for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = 0.00001). The PSA measurements indicate also at 12 months a difference between the three groups (p < 0.0001), except at 24 months, the difference between the group 2 and 3 is no longer significant. CONCLUSION: The preliminary analysis of this clinical trial indicates that patients treated with radiation therapy alone show a significantly higher rate of positive biopsies at 12 and 24 months after the end of radiation therapy as compared with those treated with total antiandrogen blockade (TAB) and radiation therapy. When analyzing the median PSA serum levels, we found the same advantage at 12 months, but, at the time of the analysis at 24 months, the PSA levels are not different between groups 2 and 3.

Metabolic effects of 12-month percutaneous dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.

We have evaluated the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) replacement therapy in 60- to 70-year-old women (n = 15) who received a single daily percutaneous application of a 10% DHEA cream for 12 months. While anthropometric measurements showed no change in body weight, we observed a 9.8% decrease in subcutaneous skinfold thickness at 12 months (P < 0.05). This was confirmed by measurements of midthigh fat and muscle areas by computed tomography where a 3.8% decrease (P < 0.05) in femoral fat and a 3.5% increase (P < 0.05) in femoral muscular areas were observed at 12 months. There was no significant change in abdominal fat measurements but the waist-to-hip ratio was only 0.83 at the onset of treatment. These changes in body fat and muscular mass were associated with a 11% decrease (P < 0.05) in fasting plasma glucose and a 17% decrease (P < 0.05) in fasting insulin levels. Treatment with DHEA had no adverse effect on the lipid or lipoprotein profile. In fact, an overall trend towards a decrease in total cholesterol and its lipoprotein fractions was observed. Plasma triglycerides were not affected. Plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol decreased by 8% but the ratio HDL/cholesterol was unchanged by DHEA treatment because of a parallel decrease in total cholesterol. The index of sebum secretion showed a 73% increase (P < 0.05) during the 12 months of DHEA therapy followed by a return to pretreatment values 3 months after cessation of therapy. At the same time, sex hormone-binding globulin levels decreased (P < 0.05) during treatment and returned to pretreatment values 3 months after the end of therapy. Serum gonadotropins were not changed by DHEA treatment. Although not significant, we observed a tendency towards an elevation in serum GH levels. Values of serum IGF-I remained unchanged while plasma IGF-binding protein-3 levels significantly decreased (P < 0.05) during treatment and returned to pretreatment values after cessation of DHEA therapy. The present data clearly indicate the beneficial effects of DHEA therapy in postmenopausal women through its transformation into androgens and/or estrogens in specific intracrine tissues without any significant side effects.

[Validation of a French adaptation of the international prostatic symptom score]. / Validation d'une adaptation française de l'échelle internationale de cotation des symptômes prostatiques.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and the validity of a French Canadian version of the International Prostatic Symptom Score. DESIGN: Between November 23, 1993 and April 8, 1994, a self-administered questionnaire was submitted to a group of men on two occasions at an interval of at least one week. This questionnaire was composed of seven questions designed to score the severity of prostatic symptoms and two questions designed to score quality of life. CONTEXT: Family medicine unit and prostatic cancer screening programme of the hormonal treatment clinic of the Laval University hospital centre. PARTICIPANTS: Men between the ages of 50 and 80 years presenting for prostatic cancer screening or for a family medicine visit were invited to participate. A total of 207 men answered the questionnaire on the first occasion and all but two answered the questionnaire on the second occasion. MAIN ASSESSMENT CRITERIA: The internal consistency of the scale, its test-retest stability, the correlation between the prostatic symptom index of the scale and the quality of life index and the urine output were estimated. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the scale has found to be good, with Cronbach's coefficient alpha equal to 0.82. Each question of the scale displayed a good test-retest stability, with coefficient Kappa varying between 0.41 and 0.66 according to the question. The correlation coefficient between the prostatic symptom index of the scale and the quality of life index was 0.75 (P < 0.001). An inverse linear relationship was observed between urine output and the prostatic symptom index, with a correlation coefficient of -0.289 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The psychometric qualities of the adapted scale, evaluated during the present study, are similar to the qualities of the original English language I-PSS scale. The present French version of the scale constitutes a reliable and valid tool to assess the severity of prostatic symptoms in the Quebec male population.

Androgen receptor modulation in benign human prostatic tissue and prostatic adenocarcinoma during neoadjuvant endocrine combination therapy.

Modulation of androgen receptor (AR) expression during neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in human prostates of patients with localized prostate cancer was investigated by immunohistochemistry. In 8 of 15 untreated prostatectomy specimens, the majority of prostatic glandular cells displayed nuclear immunostaining for AR, whereas only 1 of 26 pretreated cases displayed a similar glandular AR expression. Expression of AR in the prostatic stromal compartment of nontreated cases proved to be quite heterogeneous, since 4 of the 15 (27%) examined specimens did not show stromal AR expression. After preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, this value was 68%, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Prostatectomy specimens of the treated patients contained carcinomas with a higher Gleason score than those of untreated patients. AR expression in carcinomas of treated patients was diminished (P= 0.05), which may be attributed to their relatively lower differentiation grade. The data strongly suggest that neoadjuvant hormone therapy reduces AR expression by nonneoplastic prostatic glandular cells and carcinoma cells by a selective, but incomplete, elimination of AR-positive cells.

Diagnosis of advanced or noncurable prostate cancer can be practically eliminated by prostate-specific antigen.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the percentage of localized and potentially curable prostate cancers diagnosed at follow-up screening visits compared with the first screening visit. METHODS: Within the context of a prospective screening study performed in randomly chosen men aged between 45 and 80 years, up to 6-year follow-up screening visits have been performed with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement and digital rectal examination (DRE) followed by transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate when PSA or DRE is abnormal. RESULTS: Of the 117 prostate cancers diagnosed at 14,554 annual follow-up visits, only 1 cancer (0.9%) was metastatic compared with 8% (26/322) at 8029 first visits. Moreover, 97% of the cancers detected at follow-up visits could be identified by PSA alone compared with 86% at first visit. The incidence of 0.8% per year during 15 years of screening between the ages of 55 and 70 years would diagnose localized prostate cancer in 12% of the population, a value not too different from the 10% diagnosed with prostate cancer during life-time in the absence of screening. CONCLUSIONS: The present data show that annual screening with PSA diagnoses clinically localized prostate cancer in more than 95% of cases, thus almost completely eliminating the diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer. Moreover, the number of prostate cancers diagnosed is not significantly increased by screening.

Effect of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (combined androgen blockade) on normal prostate and prostatic carcinoma. A randomized study.

The morphologic changes induced by neoadjuvant combination endocrine therapy were evaluated in prostatectomy specimens from patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. These patients participated in a prospective, randomized clinical trial investigating the effect of 3 months of combination therapy with flutamide and an LHRH agonist prior to radical prostatectomy versus radical prostatectomy alone. Ninety-six radical prostatectomy specimens processed according to the same protocol were evaluated without knowledge of prior treatment. Forty-seven patients were randomly assigned to the neoadjuvant combination therapy group and 49 to the control arm. Compared with the control group, several changes were strongly and significantly associated with exposure to neoadjuvant combination therapy. The nonmalignant prostatic tissue showed strong prominence and hyperplasia of the basal cell layer, accompanied by epithelial cell vacuolization and markedly reduced occurrence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (p < 0.001) after combination therapy. Prostate cancer tissue, on the other hand, showed smaller nucleoli (p < 0.001), cell vacuolization (p < 0.001), rare intraluminal crystalloids (p < 0.001), higher Gleason grade (p < 0.001), lower prevalence of capsular penetration (p < 0.001), and less frequent invasion of the perineural spaces (p < 0.001) and surgical margins (p = 0.002). Tumor volume, was also reduced by more than 40% in the treated group (p = 0.007). The present findings show that preoperative endocrine combination therapy induces highly characteristic changes in both nonmalignant and cancerous prostatic tissue. Furthermore, following endocrine treatment, the surgical margins are less likely to be involved by cancer and capsular penetration is reduced.

Combination of screening and preoperative endocrine therapy: the potential for an important decrease in prostate cancer mortality.

Prostate cancer is the second cause of cancer death in men in the Western world; its medical and social impact is comparable to that of breast cancer in women. Although it is well recognized that early treatment is the only possibility for reducing the high rate of death from prostate cancer, screening and even early treatment are controversial issues due mainly to arguments based upon old literature and lack of awareness of the significant advances recently made in this field. As it is well known that surgical removal of organ-confined prostate cancer cures the disease, and it has been demonstrated that annual screening with prostate-specific antigen coupled with digital rectal examination followed, when indicated, by transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate more than doubles the proportion of organ-confined disease, screening alone offers the possibility of at least doubling the number of patients curable from prostate cancer or the potential for a cure to an estimated 45% of prostate cancer patients compared to a maximum of 20% in the absence of screening. It is important to mention that screening does not detect small and insignificant cancers, especially when random biopsies are not performed routinely. The critical volume of prostate cancer is estimated at 0.3 cm or a tumor 7.5 mm in diameter, if spherical. Such a tumor should increase serum prostate-specific antigen by 0.5 ng/mL. Contrary to the belief that screening detects cancers that are too small, the fact is that screening detects prostate cancer too late or nonorgan- or nonspecimen-confined cancer in 35-50% of cases. There is, thus, a narrow window when prostate cancer can be detected at a curable stage, and even the best available screening techniques cannot succeed in all cases. It should be mentioned that the recent improvements of the technique of radical prostatectomy have markedly improved the acceptability of surgery. Concerning the recent publicity related to watchful waiting, it is essential to indicate that all such reports support the notion that prostate cancer grows slowly, but steadily and irremediably, with increasing malignancy and risk of distant metastases and death if sufficient time is allowed. Another serious limitation of watchful waiting is that the available prognostic factors have a large margin of error and cannot predict with certainty the rate of progression of the tumor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)