Ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine in unreliable blunt trauma patients: incidence, evaluation, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: The potential for ligamentous injury of the cervical spine (C-spine) may mandate prolonged neck immobilization via a hard cervical collar in the blunt trauma victim (BTV) with altered sensorium. We investigated the incidence of ligamentous C-spine injuries, and whether applying (post hoc) the practice management guidelines from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (three radiograph views plus computed tomographic scan of C1-C2) would have detected the injuries. METHODS: The study was a 3-year retrospective review of BTVs admitted to the state's Primary Adult Resource Center for trauma from 1996 to 1998. Unreliable patients were defined as those with admission Glasgow Coma Scale score < 15. A rigorous algorithm to clear the C-spine was used. Pure ligamentous C-spine injury was defined as a C-spine having abnormal anatomic alignment, dislocation, subluxation, or listhesis, but without fracture. Demographics, diagnostic studies, presence of neurologic deficit, therapy, survival, and disposition were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 14,577 BTVs with 614 (4.2%) patients having C-spine injury. There were 2,605 (18%) unreliable patients, with 143 (5.5%) of these having C-spine injury, 129 (90%) having fracture and 14 (10% of BTVs; 0.5% of unreliable patients) having no fracture. Of the 14 unreliable patients with pure ligamentous C-spine injury, 13 had initial diagnosis by supine cross-table lateral radiograph. The one exception had a normal three-view radiographic series, but atlanto-occipital dislocation was diagnosed by computed tomographic scan. Eight patients had upper level injury (C0-C4) and six were lower (C4-C7). Four patients died within 30 minutes after admission, 4 underwent cervical fusion, and 6 were treated with collar only. Five (50%) of the survivors had no apparent neurologic deficit attributed to the C-spine at admission. Nine patients remained institutionalized after discharge and one was discharged home. CONCLUSION: Ligamentous injuries without fracture of the C-spine are rare. Application of the practice management guidelines developed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma for identifying C-spine instability is effective and should facilitate early removal of the cervical collar in unreliable patients.

Predicting regional variations in mortality from motor vehicle crashes.

OBJECTIVE: To show that the previously-observed inverse relationship between population density and per-capita mortality from motor vehicle crashes can be derived from a simple mathematical model that can be used for prediction. METHODS: The authors proposed models in which the number of fatal crashes in an area was directly proportional to the population and also to some power of the mean distance between hospitals. Alternatively, these can be parameterized as Weibull survival models. Using county and state data from the U.S. Census, the authors fitted linear regression equations on a logarithmic scale to test the validity of these models. RESULTS: The southern states conformed to a different model from the other states. If an indicator variable was used to distinguish these groups, the resulting model accounted for 74% of the variation from state to state (Alaska excepted). After controlling for mean inter-hospital distance, the southern states had a per-capita mortality 1.37 times that of the other states. CONCLUSIONS: Simply knowing the mean distance between hospitals in a region allows a fiarly accurate estimate of its per-capita mortality from vehicle crashes. After controlling for this factor, vehicle crash mortality per capita is higher in the southern states, for reasons yet to be explained.

Return to work following injury: the role of economic, social, and job-related factors.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined factors influencing return to work (RTW) following severe fracture to a lower extremity. METHODS: This prospective cohort study followed 312 individuals treated for a lower extremity fracture at 3 level-1 trauma centers. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion of RTW were computed, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the contribution of multiple risk factors on RTW. RESULTS: Cumulative proportions of RTW at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-injury were 0.26, 0.49, 0.60, and 0.72. After accounting for the extent of impairment, characteristics of the patient that correlated with higher rates of RTW included younger age, higher education, higher income, the presence of strong social support, and employment in a white-collar job that was not physically demanding. Receipt of disability compensation had a strong negative effect on RTW. CONCLUSIONS: Despite relatively high rates of recovery, one quarter of persons with lower extremity fractures did not return to work by the end of 1 year. The analysis points to subgroups of individuals who are at high risk of delayed RTW, with implications for interventions at the patient, employer, and policy levels.

Correlation between the measures of impairment, according to the modified system of the American Medical Association, and function.

We performed a prospective study of 302 patients who had a fracture of the lower extremity. Our purpose was to determine whether there was any association between impairment ratings of the lower extremity, derived with use of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment by the American Medical Association, and measurements of task performance based on direct observation as well as the patient's own assessment of activity limitation and disability as recorded on the Sickness Impact Profile. The mean residual impairment of the lower extremity according to the Guides was 27 per cent one year after the injury. Only 130 subjects (43 per cent) could perform all five functional tasks without difficulty. Eighty-four subjects (28 per cent) reported functional limitations that resulted in a score on the Sickness Impact Profile that was more than one standard deviation from the preinjury norm for the sample. Impairment ratings according to a modification of the system of the American Medical Association correlated strongly with the performance of functional tasks (r = 0.57) as well as the patients' reported activity limitations as recorded on the Sickness Impact Profile (r = 0.55). Correlations were highest when measures of impairment were based on strength rather than on range of motion. The relationship between the impairment rating and function (as observed by an examiner and as reported by the patient) was not influenced by the location of the fracture or the receipt of disability compensation. Our results suggest that the American Medical Association developed a valid approach for the measurement of physical impairment after a fracture of the lower extremity. In our study, the anatomical approach of evaluation based on muscle strength that was described in the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment was the most sensitive measure of impairment compared with the anatomical measure based on range of motion and compared with the functional and diagnostic methods for the rating of impairment. Until the diagnostic and functional approaches for the measurement of musculoskeletal impairment are refined, we recommend use of the anatomical approach when evaluating impairment after a fracture of the lower extremity.

Monitoring hospital trauma mortality using statistical process control methods.

BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a simple and effective way to monitor trends in trauma mortality, using objective clinical categories and methods of statistical process control. STUDY DESIGN: Control charts and Pareto analysis were applied to trauma mortality data at the Maine Medical Center. We collected data prospectively on patients who died in our hospital after acute injury during 1985-1996 (and retrospectively for 1975-1984) to identify cases requiring medical quality review. We excluded from this study patients older than 80 years, those whose Glasgow Coma Scale motor component was never > 3 at any time after admission, and those with pathologic fractures, carcinomatosis, high quadriplegia, or severe burns. The remaining deaths were classified as resulting from inability to resuscitate (mostly hemorrhage), neurologic deterioration, or organ failure. The annual numbers in each of these categories were evaluated under the hypothesis of stationary Poisson processes with mean values equal to those seen from 1975-1984. RESULTS: After the exclusions, annual mortality from trauma has remained within control limits consistent with the Poisson model. Death from neurologic deterioration has shown a trend consistent with significant improvement in the process mean. Transient peaks in the other categories did not exceed control limits, but Pareto analysis prompted detailed studies of aortic and liver trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Process control methodology is easy to apply and potentially useful in monitoring hospital trauma mortality.

Abdominal injuries without hemoperitoneum: a potential limitation of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST)

BACKGROUND: Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) relies on hemoperitoneum to identify patients with injury. Blunt trauma victims (BTVs) with abdominal injury, but without hemoperitoneum, on admission are at risk for missed injury. METHODS: Clinical, radiologic, and FAST data were collected prospectively on BTVs over a 12-month period. All patients with FAST-negative for hemoperitoneum were further analyzed. Examination findings and associated injuries were evaluated for association with abdominal lesions. RESULTS: Of 772 BTVs undergoing FAST, 52 (7%) had abdominal injury. Fifteen of 52 (29%) had no hemoperitoneum by admission computed tomographic scan, and all had FAST interpreted as negative. Four patients with splenic injury underwent laparotomy. Six other patients with splenic injury and five patients with hepatic injury were managed nonoperatively. Clinical risk factors significantly associated with abdominal injury in BTVs without hemoperitoneum include: abrasion, contusion, pain, or tenderness in the lower chest or upper abdomen; pulmonary contusion; lower rib fractures; hemo- or pneumothorax; hematuria; pelvic fracture; and thoracolumbar spine fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 29% of abdominal injuries may be missed if BTVs are evaluated with admission FAST as the sole diagnostic tool. Consideration of examination findings and associated injuries should reduce the risk of missed abdominal injury in BTVs with negative FAST results.

Blunt and penetrating trauma--has anything changed?

Management of abdominal trauma has changed significantly in the last decade. The next decade will also see significant change as imaging and minimally invasive surgical techniques evolve and more approaches are examined in well-designed prospective studies.

Post-traumatic multiple organ dysfunction syndrome--infection is an uncommon antecedent risk factor.

A pattern of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and risk factors following blunt trauma was identified, based on analyses of clinical data from 3611 patients who were admitted directly to a level I trauma centre and had hospital stays > or = 3 days. Five system dysfunctions were simultaneously associated (P < 0.05) with death (adjusted odds ratio): adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (4.9), renal failure (6.7), hyperglycaemia (3.6), recurrent acidosis (4.8) and hypoalbuminaemia (1.8). Mortality increased with the number of system dysfunctions. For the 336 patients with MODS (> or = 2 dysfunctions), mortality was 32.4 per cent compared with 1.3 per cent in the non-MODS group (P = 0.0001). Of the 254 with MODS occurring within 72 hours, mortality was 27 per cent compared with 49 per cent in those manifesting MODS later (P < 0.001). The 175 (52.1 per cent) with organ failure (renal failure and/or ARDS) also had metabolic dysfunction. Seven admission risk factors were independently associated (P < 0.003) with MODS [adjusted odds ratio]: pre-existing condition (3.4), age > 50 (3.1), Injury Severity Score > or = 25 (6.4), hypotension (2.8), acidaemia (2.2), 24 h blood loss > 1 l (3.7), and major base deficit (1.6). Only 13 per cent with MODS had an infection in the 5 days before or at initiation of MODS. Haemodynamic instability, acidosis, blood loss, pre-existing condition, age and serious injury were risk factors independently related to life-threatening MODS, but infection was an uncommon precursor except in late MODS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mortality factors in geriatric blunt trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine various clinical factors for their ability to predict mortality in geriatric patients following blunt trauma. DESIGN: In this retrospective study, trauma registries and medical records from three trauma centers were reviewed for patients 65 years and older who had sustained blunt trauma. The following variables were extracted and examined independently and in combination for their ability to predict death: age, gender, mechanism of injury, admission blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale score, respiratory status, Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, and Injury Severity Score. SETTING: Three urban trauma centers. PATIENTS: Geriatric trauma patients entering three trauma centers (Stanford [Calif] University Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn, and Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems, Baltimore) following blunt trauma during a 7-year period (1982 to 1989). RESULTS: The Injury Severity Score was the single variable that correlated most significantly with mortality. Mortality rates were higher for men than for women and were significantly higher in patients 75 years and older. Admission variables associated with the highest relative risks of death included a Trauma Score less than 7; hypotension (systolic blood pressure, < 90 mm Hg); hypoventilation (respiratory rate, < 10 breaths per minute); or a Glasgow Coma Scale score equal to 3. CONCLUSIONS: Admission variables in geriatric trauma patients can be used to predict outcome and may also be useful in making decisions about triage, quality assurance, and use of intensive care unit beds.

Causes and costs of injuries in multiple trauma patients requiring extrication from motor vehicle crashes.

Prospective and contemporaneous medical and economic cost studies of 144 victims of motor vehicle crashes admitted to a regional level I trauma center with multiple injuries (ISS > or = 16) revealed 122 non-ejected patients, of whom 102 required extrication (EXTRIC) from the vehicle for physical or medical reasons and 20 who did not (N group). There were no differences in age (EXTRIC, 34 +/- 17 years; N, 41 +/- 24 years), type of crash (Frontal: 57% EXTRIC, 60% N; Lateral: 32% EXTRIC, 35% N) restraint use (35% EXTRIC, 35% N), or mortality (29% EXTRIC, 30% N). However, the estimated maximum speed before the crash was higher in EXTRIC patients (50 +/- 16 mph vs. 46 +/- 18 mph N, p < 0.04), as was the change in velocity (delta V) on impact (EXTRIC 30 +/- 15 mph; N, 24 +/- 8 mph, p < 0.01). Brain injuries (51% EXTRIC vs. 35% N) and lower extremity injuries were more numerous in EXTRIC patients (59% vs. 20% N, p < 0.003) and the number of splenic, lower extremity, and pelvic injuries associated with shock was greater in EXTRIC patients, p < 0.02; as were postinjury complications. As a result, operating room costs from orthopedic and plastic surgery increased professional charges in the EXTRIC group versus the N group ($20,000, EXTRIC; $17,000, N) and critical care costs ($13,000, EXTRIC; $4,000, N) with total costs of $72,000 and $77,000, respectively. The lower extremity injuries in EXTRIC patients were primarily a result of body part contacts with intrusions (CIs) of the car occupant compartment structures [73% with vs. 24% without (p < 0.0001)]. In lateral MVCs, brain injuries were also more commonly associated with CIs of the side window frame or A pillar (72% CI vs. 25% no CI; p < 0.035); but as a whole in MVCs in which extrication was necessary, lower extremity injuries from instrument panel or toepan CIs appeared more frequent than those resulting from contacts only (p < 0.0001). In EXTRIC patients, 69% of those in shock had CI injuries, and 80% of the deaths in the EXTRIC group were associated with CI injury. These data suggest that measures designed to prevent CIs by strengthening car passenger compartment structures may reduce the incidence of severe brain and lower extremity injuries and may reduce the need for extrication after MVCs.

Injury patterns associated with direction of impact: drivers admitted to trauma centers.

Clinical data on the nature and severity of injuries was linked with data from police crash reports for 3675 car or truck drivers admitted to trauma centers. Different patterns of injuries were noted for drivers in frontal compared with left lateral collisions. Injuries to the face and lower extremities were significantly greater in frontal collisions; thorax, abdominal, and pelvic injuries were significantly greater in lateral collisions. In addition, drivers in lateral collisions were found to have significantly more multiple injuries to the abdomen and thorax. Despite no difference in mean injury Severity Score, drivers in left lateral collisions had a significantly higher mortality rate; moreover, this increased mortality was not merely a reflection of the increased incidence of lateral collisions among older drivers. In conclusion, information on direction of impact has potential use for clinical decision making, since drivers in lateral collisions have a higher incidence of occult abdominal and thoracic injuries.

Physical impairment and functional outcomes six months after severe lower extremity fractures.

To determine functional outcomes after lower extremity fracture (LEF), a prospective follow-up study of patients admitted to three level I trauma centers for treatment of unilateral LEFs was conducted. In this paper we describe outcomes at 6 months after discharge from the initial hospitalization and examine the relationship between impairment and disability. A total of 444 patients met the entry criteria for the study. Of these 376 (85%) were successfully located and interviewed at 6 months; 302 (68%) returned to the trauma center at 6 months for a clinical assessment by a physical therapist. Study patients were predominantly young (mean age = 32.4), white (72%) men (70%) who were working before the injury (77%). The fractures resulted primarily from motor vehicle crashes (71%); mean hospital LOS was 12 days. Disability was measured using the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), a well validated patient assessment of health status. The overall SIP score averaged for all patients was 10.2, denoting a moderate level of dysfunction or disability. Analysis of the 12 subscores that constitute the SIP indicate particularly high scores for ambulation (16.7 postdischarge vs. 1.2 preinjury), sleep and rest (14.0 vs. 5.1), emotional behavior (10.5 vs. 2.2), home management (15.1 vs. 2.6), recreation and pastimes (19.0 vs. 4.4), and most notably, work (33.2 vs. 8.3). Further analysis of the subgroup of patients working before the injury shows that 48% had returned to work at 6 months. Correlations between lower extremity impairment (range of motion, muscle strength, and pain) and the ambulation subscore of the SIP were high. However, correlations between impairment and more global areas of activity such as home management, work, and recreation were considerably lower. These results suggest that other factors, over and above the extent of physical impairment, significantly influence broader disability outcomes such as return to work. Further research is needed to define these factors so that effective interventions after acute care can be identified and appropriately targeted.

Patient-oriented functional outcome after unilateral lower extremity fracture.

To determine patient-perceived functional outcome after lower extremity fracture (LEF), a prospective, follow-up study of patients managed at three level I trauma centers was conducted. Patients with unilateral LEF involving the acetabulum and distally were eligible for the study. A total of 444 patients were enrolled. Of these, 363 (82%) were interviewed at 6 months postdischarge. Study patients were predominantly young (mean age 34 years), white (72%) men (71%) who had been working preinjury (78%). Their injuries resulted primarily from motor vehicle crashes (73%); 30% had more than one fracture to the same extremity. Functional status was measured using the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), a well-validated, general health status instrument. Mean 6-month SIP scores were significantly worse (higher) than those based on preinjury activities (9.8 vs. 2.5) (p < 0.01). Overall disability levels were moderate compared with other health conditions. Analysis of the 12 subscores comprising the SIP indicated particularly high scores in ambulation (16.2 postdischarge vs. 1.1 preinjury), sleep/rest (13.1 vs. 5.1), household management (14.5 vs. 2.6), recreation (17.6 vs. 4.2), emotional well-being (9.9 vs. 2.1), and most significantly work (33.2 vs. 8.8). Of those working preinjury, only 49% had returned by 6 months. SIP scores were highest for persons with three or more fractures to the same extremity and for fracture patterns typical of high-energy forces.

Direct physician entry of injury information and automated coding via a graphical user interface.

Injury data in the paper medical record are often inaccurate or lack adequate specificity to evaluate trauma patient care. To improve the quality of recorded injury data, we are testing a graphical, anatomic-based interface for quick collection of detailed injury information directly from the trauma physician. Navigation and data collection throughout the interface are facilitated by anatomic illustrations, menus, lists, and "dialog boxes". Using a "point and click" method, the user selects a specific anatomic structure (i.e., the spleen) from drawings. Detailed injury information, specific to the selected structure, is then collected from the user in an "intelligent" modal dialog box. The software uses SNOMED III nomenclature to create and store ICD, AIS, and trauma registry codes for each injury. Users can review and print abbreviated and detailed injury information for each patient. This demonstration will walk viewers through the injury collection and review process for injuries to the abdomen. We plan to evaluate the interface for accuracy, speed, user satisfaction and resources expended by comparing it with current methods of data collection and injury coding at our level I trauma facility.

Injury severity: better data through direct physician entry of anatomic injuries?

The authors compared the injury diagnoses and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) generated by three data-collection and -coding methods, and examined the times needed and costs associated with the methods. One method involved direct electronic entry of injury data by a physician in the admitting area. Codes, severity scores, and times and costs varied significantly with the different methods, thus suggesting a need for further study of the derivation of injury severity codes.