Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Issues Ment Health Nurs ; 33(8): 544-52, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22849782

ABSTRACT

This multi-method pilot study implemented a relationally-based intervention with mothers of school-aged children receiving treatment for exposure to domestic violence. Grounded in psychodynamic and attachment theories, the short-term intervention consisted of targeted individual and group sessions. Quantitative as well as qualitative data were examined for trends and exemplars of important process outcomes. Improvements were evidenced in a number of key areas including psychiatric symptoms, isolation, defensive avoidance, coping skills, attributional style, and reflective functioning. Results converged to portray improved functioning in critical areas of dysfunction often displayed by these mothers.


Subject(s)
Child of Impaired Parents/psychology , Domestic Violence/psychology , Family Therapy/methods , Mother-Child Relations , Mothers/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Parenting , Pilot Projects , Treatment Outcome , United States
2.
Environ Res ; 111(1): 57-66, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21075365

ABSTRACT

Environmental health indicators (EHIs) are applied in a variety of research and decision-making settings to gauge the health consequences of environmental hazards, to summarize complex information, or to compare policy impacts across locations or time periods. While EHIs can provide a useful means of conveying information, they also can be misused. Additional research is needed to help researchers and policy-makers understand categories of indicators and their appropriate application. In this article, we review current frameworks for environmental health indicators and discuss the advantages and limitations of various forms. A case study EHI system was developed for air pollution and health for urban Latin American centers in order to explore how underlying assumptions affect indicator results. Sixteen cities were ranked according to five indicators that considered: population exposed, children exposed, comparison to health-based guidelines, and overall PM(10) levels. Results indicate that although some overall patterns in rankings were observed, cities' relative rankings were highly dependent on the indicator used. In fact, a city that was ranked best under one indicator was ranked worst with another. The sensitivity of rankings, even when considering a simple case of a single pollutant, highlights the need for clear understanding of EHIs and how they may be affected by underlying assumptions. Careful consideration should be given to the purpose, assumptions, and limitations of EHIs used individually or in combination in order to minimize misinterpretation of their implications and enhance their usefulness.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Cities , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Particulate Matter/analysis , Public Health , Humans , Latin America , Urban Population
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...