Caregiver-provider communication after resection of pediatric brain tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Because caregivers are a crucial part of a child's medical care, it is important to understand how to best communicate with them during hospitalization. Qualitative research can elucidate the best strategies for effective parent-provider communication. This study aims to reveal communication styles of neurosurgery team members, and to identify areas for improvement in the future. METHODS: Caregivers of children with a newly diagnosed brain tumor requiring neurosurgery were enrolled during their child's hospitalization. During routine follow-up clinic visits within 3 months after diagnosis and tumor resection, caregivers participated in a semistructured interview, which assessed the quality of communication with the neurosurgery and oncology teams during hospitalization. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for common themes until thematic saturation was reached. RESULTS: During caregiver interviews (N = 22), several domains were discussed including communicating the diagnosis to the patient and siblings, to the rest of the family/support network, and with the neurosurgery team. Regarding parent-neurosurgeon communication, 82% of caregivers identified at least one positive aspect and 55% identified at least one negative aspect of communication. Caregivers who provided positive feedback appreciated that their neurosurgeon was thorough (73%), direct (27%), or compassionate (14%). They also valued when providers would speak "on my level" (18%) and would speak directly to the patient (27%). In terms of negative feedback, caregivers identified miscommunications (32%), discussing the diagnosis in front of the child before feeling prepared to do so (14%), and a lack of clarity about expectations, medications, or treatment (32%). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide specific ways in which neurosurgery providers have communicated effectively with caregivers and identify areas for improvement. Results have been used to develop a navigator-led intervention geared toward improving parent-provider communication during hospitalization for resection of a brain tumor.

Impact of the mental health and dynamic referral for oncology (MHADRO) program on oncology patient outcomes, health care utilization, and health provider behaviors: A multi-site randomized control trial.

OBJECTIVE: The MHADRO assesses psychosocial and medical needs, provides tailored feedback reports, and connects patients to mental health providers. This study examined the MHADRO's effect on patient outcomes, health care utilization, and oncology provider documentation and behaviors. METHODS: 836 patients were part of a multi-site RCT and assessments were conducted at baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The intervention group engaged in less emergency calls to providers. There were no differences in psychosocial outcomes at follow up assessments. Providers of patients in the intervention group were more likely to: document psychosocial symptoms and history; refer to psychosocial services; encourage support groups; seek psychological evaluations during visits. Patients who agreed to a mental health referral had decreased hospitalizations, increased mental health care interactions, and stronger ratings of counseling potential benefits. This group also reported increased psychosocial distress at all follow-up assessments. CONCLUSION: The MHADRO may increase access to mental health care, lessen utilization, and improve providers' management of psychosocial needs, but does not appear to impact overall functioning over time. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providers are encouraged to consider incorporating programs, like the MHADRO, into patient care as they may have the potential to impact screening and management of patients' psychosocial needs.

Coping strategies used by caregivers of children with newly diagnosed brain tumors.

In BriefThe authors interviewed families whose children had recently been hospitalized with a new brain tumor. From these interviews, they identified parents' coping strategies for handling the stress of having a child with a newly diagnosed tumor. Some strategies are considered "adaptive" and help parents deal with the stress better. Others are "maladaptive," leading to worse outcomes. Parents of children with brain tumors are at risk for maladaptive coping. Efforts to teach parents how to cope effectively with the stress of a sick child have the potential to improve outcomes.

Distress and psychosocial risk in families with newly diagnosed pediatric brain tumors.

In BriefThe investigators administered surveys to parents whose children were hospitalized with a brain tumor. They learned that parents in this situation are highly distressed, and that families have multiple sources of stress when a child is hospitalized. The investigators used this information to improve the psychosocial supportive care provided at their hospital. In general, these findings have the potential to improve the patient's and family's experience with a new brain tumor by guiding teams to address family needs as well as the child's acute medical needs.

The Distress Thermometer: Cutoff Points and Clinical Use

Purpose/Objectives: To establish an optimal cutoff point for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Distress Thermometer (DT) as a screening measure to identify and address psychological distress in individuals with cancer, and to examine whether distress as measured by the DT significantly changes across the treatment trajectory. Design: Secondary analyses of baseline data from a longitudinal parent study examining a computerized psychosocial assessment. Setting: Three diverse comprehensive cancer centers across the United States. Sample: 836 patients with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Methods: Study participants were selected from a randomized clinical trial. Patients during any stage of the cancer treatment trajectory were recruited during a chemotherapy infusion or routine oncology appointment. Main Research Variables: The Behavioral Health Status Index and the DT were administered and compared using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Findings: Results support a cutoff score of 3 on the DT to indicate patients with clinically elevated levels of distress. In addition, patients who received a diagnosis within the 1­4 weeks prior to the assessment indicated the highest levels of distress. Conclusions: Providers may wish to use a cutoff point of 3 to most efficiently identify distress in a large, diverse population of patients with cancer. In addition, results indicate that patients may experience a heightened state of distress within 1­4 weeks postdiagnosis compared to other stages of coping with cancer. Implications for Nursing: Using a brief measure of distress can help streamline the process of screening for psychosocial distress.

Predictors of psychological distress and interest in mental health services in individuals with cancer.

Identifying risk factors for psychological distress in patients with cancer may help providers more efficiently screen, identify, and manage distress. This article presents predictors of psychological distress in a large heterogeneous sample of cancer patients. In total, 836 patients were enrolled in a large randomized control trial and completed computerized psychosocial assessments Mental Health Assessment and Dynamic Referral for Oncology. Multivariate regressions examined predictors of distress and interest in mental health services. Final models suggest that psychological distress was related to six variables, and interest in mental health services was related to previous history of mental health counseling, total number of cancer-related symptoms, and race/ethnicity. Results may be used to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from proactive psychosocial interventions.

Randomized controlled trial to test a computerized psychosocial cancer assessment and referral program: methods and research design.

The National Cancer Coalition Network, National Cancer Institute, and American College of Surgeons all emphasize the need for oncology providers to identify, address, and monitor psychosocial needs of their patients. The Mental Health Assessment and Dynamic Referral for Oncology (MHADRO) is a patient-driven, computerized, psychosocial assessment that identifies, addresses, and monitors physical, psychological, and social issues faced by oncology patients. This paper presents the methodology of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that tested the impact of the MHADRO on patient outcomes at 2, 6, and 12 months. Patient outcomes including overall psychological distress, depression, anxiety, functional disability, and use of psychosocial resources will be presented in future publications after all follow-up data is gathered. Eight hundred and thirty six cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses, across three comprehensive cancer centers in different parts of the United States, were randomized to the MHADRO (intervention) or an assessment-only control group. Patients in the intervention group were provided detailed, personalized reports and, when needed, referrals to mental health services; their oncology provider received detailed reports designed to foster clinical decision making. Those patients who demonstrated high levels of psychosocial problems were given the option to authorize that a copy of their report be sent electronically to a "best match" mental health professional. Demographic and patient cancer-related data as well as comparisons between patients who were enrolled and those who declined enrollment are presented. Challenges encountered during the RCT and strategies used to address them are discussed.