Antiproliferative and antimicrobial activity of traditional Kombucha and Satureja montana L. Kombucha.

PURPOSE: To carry out a preliminary investigation of the biological activity of Kombucha beverages from Camellia sinensis L. (black tea) and Satureja montana L. (winter savory tea), that have consuming acidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cell growth effect was measured by sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay on HeLa (cervix epithelioid carcinoma), HT-29 (colon adenocarcinoma), and MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma). Antimicrobial activity to bacteria, yeasts and moulds was determined by agar-well diffusion method. RESULTS: Consuming Kombuchas had the most expressive antimicrobial activity against all investigated bacteria, except Sarcina lutea, while unfermented tea samples had no activity. Traditional Kombucha showed higher activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli than acetic acid, while both neutralized Kombuchas had bacteriostatic activity on Salmonella enteritidis. Examined Kombuchas did not stimulate cell proliferation of the investigated cell lines. Antiproliferative activity of winter savory tea Kombucha was comparable to that of traditional Kombucha made from black tea. Furthermore, in HeLa cell line Satureja montana L. Kombucha induced cell growth inhibition by 20% (IC20) at lower concentration compared to the activity of water extract of Satureja montana L. obtained in our previous research. CONCLUSION: Presence of more active antiproliferative component(s) in Satureja montana L. Kombucha compared to Satureja montana L. water extract and antimicrobial component(s) other than acetic acid in both Kombuchas is suggested.

Single-center prospective, randomized analysis of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy.

AIM: Several studies, comparing early and long-term results of the conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and eversion carotid endarterectomy (EEA), were conducted for past 10 years. Nevertheless, it still remaining difficult to choose optimal endarterectomy technique. Choice yet mainly depends of experience of attending surgeon. The aim of this study was the comparison early and long-term results of the EEA and CEA. METHODS: Randomly, 103 patients were operated on in the eversion, and 98 patients in the conventional technique; 97 (48.3%) patients were asymptomatic and 104 (51.7%) had symptomatic lesions. All patients underwent preoperative cervical duplex scanning and neurological examination. The surgical procedure was carried out under general anesthesia. In cases with retrograde blood pressure less than 20 mmHg shunt was used; 78.6% of all CEA were finished up with ''patch'' angioplasty and 21.4% by primary suture. The primary outcomes were perioperative and late mortality, perioperative and late central neurological complications, a long-term survival rate and late restenosis incidence. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 38 months. Mortality and long-term survival rate were similar in compared groups. The perioperative central neurological complications incidence were comparable in study groups (3.9% vs 12.1% , odds ratio 3.45, 95% confidence interval 1.1-11.1; P=0.029). The late restenosis incidence was significantly lower in eversion group (0.0% vs 6.1%). CONCLUSION: EEA has an advantage over the conventional procedure. The authors recommend CEA in cases when retrograde pressure indicated the use of the intraluminal shunting.