Influence of infection control report cards on patients' choice of hospital: pilot survey.

The impact on patients' attitudes of quality report cards on infection control in hospitals has never previously been studied. In 2006, the French government implemented a mandatory report card on infection control activity (ICALIN) in all hospitals. This approach was aimed at encouraging professionals to change their routine practices in case they should lose patients due to a low ICALIN score. Our objective was to assess what impact ICALIN could have on patients' attitude as regards hospital choice. We performed a survey of patients and visitors in 14 randomly selected hospitals of various ICALIN scores. A convenience sample of 381 patients and visitors completed an anonymous questionnaire on ICALIN, their reasons for choosing a hospital and attitude in the event of a low ICALIN score. Factors associated with interest in ICALIN and impact of ICALIN on hospital choice were assessed by logistic regression. Our results showed that 77% of participants were interested in ICALIN. ICALIN was ranked sixth as a reason for choosing a hospital. In the case of a low ICALIN, 24.1% of participants would refuse admission and 54.9% would seek advice from their general practitioner. Sociodemographic factors had no influence on patients' attitude. In conclusion, our survey suggests that patients take note of poor performance on infection control report cards. As most patients rely on their general practitioner to interpret these report cards, there is a definite need for further communication with general practitioners on this issue.

[How are palliative care needs estimated in short-stay establishments? Apropos of an experience in Côte d'Or]. / Comment estimer les besoins en soins palliatifs dans les établissements de court séjour? A propos d'une expérience en Côte d'Or.

The evaluation of needs and means concerning the care of patients in palliative treatment is among the problems seen as priority by the High Committee for Public Health. We have thus tried to characterise, in a specific health sector, the patients receiving palliative care in short-stay establishments in order to evaluate their care needs. We carried out an exhaustive descriptive survey among all public and private short-stay establishments in the Côte d'Or region. Of the 2116 patients in the hospital on the day of the survey, roughly 30% were considered as eligible for palliative care (patients suffering from serious, chronic and progressive illnesses). The average age of these patients is 63.9 years (standard deviation 19.7). They mainly suffer from tumours (50%), circulatory pathologies (15%), mental illness (7%), or neurological illnesses (6%). Among the patients that may need palliative care, 38% say they feel pain despite treatment with pain-killers among 25.3% of them. The personnel providing care is insufficiently trained in palliative care or in pain, as only a maximum of 18% of nurses and 5% of doctors in short-stay establishments have been trained in these areas.

[Prognostic factors of recurrence and/or death in colorectal cancer: multistate modeling]. / L'influence de facteurs pronostiques sur la survenue de reprise evolutive et/ou du décès après cancer colo-rectal: utilisation d'un modèle multi-evénements.

Analysis of survival of patients with cancer sets particular epidemiological and statistical problems, especially when one wants to take into account metastasis or local recurrences. Cox's model does not allow modeling multiple events. Wei et al. have proposed an extension of Cox's model, by formulating the marginal distributions of multivariate failure times, which allows testing covariates effects on different events. We applied these methods to data from the Registry of Digestive Tumors of Burgundy, France. Prognostic factors of recurrence are rectal location of tumor and advanced stage at diagnosis. Prognostic factors of death are male gender, age greater than 75, rectal location and advanced stages. However, relative risk of recurrence for advanced stages is significantly greater than relative risk of death (p=4.10(-3)), while tumor location has the same influence on the two events.