Gender differences in management of patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common type of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Similar to other cardiac tests and interventions, gender bias may influence clinical decision making in providing appropriate care for AVNRT patients. We assessed for gender differences in the diagnosis and management of AVNRT patients who underwent catheter ablation. METHODS: Patients who underwent catheter ablation for AVNRT were included. We explored the gender difference on various clinical parameters such as the time from SVT symptoms, SVT diagnosis, and first electrophysiology consult to time of catheter ablation. RESULTS: Among 140 patients screened, 116 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 67.2% women. Median time from symptoms onset to SVT diagnosis was 18.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-58.5) in women versus 4.0 months (0.75-34.7) in men, P = .005. Once SVT was diagnosed, women took a median of 12.5 months (IQR 3.0-57.0) to proceed with ablation versus 3.0 months (1.0-7.0) for men, P ≤ .001. It took a longer time from the first electrophysiology consultation to ablation: 54.5 days (20.75-144.75) for women versus 20.5 days (6.0-46.25) for men, P = .008. Overall, it took 60.0 months (IQR 12.8-132.0) for women to have an ablation from initial symptoms onset versus 15 months (IQR 4.6-48.0) for men, P = .001. Prior to ablation, women had 3.78 ± 3.79 (mean ± SD) emergency department visits for SVT versus men 1.52 ± 1.72 and women tried 1.28 ± 0.82 medications versus men 0.76 ± 0.68, P < .001 and .001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates significant and multifactorial gender-related disparities in AVNRT diagnosis and treatment. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results.

Fluctuations in premature ventricular contraction burden can affect medical assessment and management.

BACKGROUND: Frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) can cause disabling symptoms and decrease left ventricular ejection fraction. PVC burden, typically quantified by a 24-hour monitor, is one of the factors that determines the clinical management of PVCs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of variability in 24-hour PVC burden during 14-day ambulatory cardiac monitoring in patients with significant PVC burden. METHODS: All patients referred for PVC evaluation received a 14-day ambulatory cardiac monitor. Parameters of interest included mean 14-day PVC burden, minimum and maximum 24-hour PVC burden, and absolute change in 24-hour PVC burden (maximum minus minimum). We included only patients with a mean 14-day PVC burden of more than 5%. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included in the study. The median of mean 14-day PVC burden, maximum 24-hour PVC burden, and minimum 24-hour PVC burden were 9.0% (IQR 6.4%-17.9%), 16.2% (IQR 11.7%-26.2%), and 4.5% (IQR 2.6%-11.2%) respectively (P < .001). The median of the absolute 24-hour PVC burden change was 9.9% (IQR 5.4%-14.5%). There was a 2.45-fold (IQR 1.68- to 5.55-fold) median difference between maximum 24-hour PVC burden and minimum 24-hour burden in the same patient. When categorized by low (<10%), intermediate (10%-20%), and high (>20%) 24-hour PVC burden, 72.9% patients fell into at least 2 categories depending on the 24-hour period considered. CONCLUSION: There is a significant variation in 24-hour PVC burden when measured over a 14-day period in patients with of PVC burden of more than 5%. This variation might impact critical clinical decisions in a significant proportion of such patients.

Sex differences in complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results on 85,977 patients.

PURPOSE: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). The differences in complication rates and outcomes between women and men remain poorly studied. We aimed to study the sex differences in morbidity and mortality associated with CA in AF. METHODS: Using weighted sampling from the National Inpatient Sample database, women and men with a primary diagnosis of AF and a primary procedure of CA (2004-2013) were identified. We compared the following outcomes based on the sex: (1) major complications [post-procedure transfusion, cardiac drain or surgery, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident, major cardiac events, kidney failure requiring dialysis, and sepsis], (2) overall complications (minor and/or major complications), and (3) in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 85,977 patients who underwent CA for AF, 27821 (32.4%) were women. Overall complications were more frequent among women versus among men (12.4% versus 9.0%; p < 0.001), as well as major complications (4.7% versus 2.7%; p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in mortality (0.3% versus 0.2%; p = 0.22). After adjusting for other factors, women were more likely than men to have major complication (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.21-1.82; p < 0.001). Prior CABG was associated with lower risk of major complications in both sexes (odds ratio in the overall cohort 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.61; p = 0.002), mostly driven by the reduction in tamponade and pericardial drain. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF, the female sex was associated with higher rate of complications compared to male but no difference in mortality. Prior CABG was associated with a significant reduction of major complications in both sexes.

Junctional ectopic rhythm after AVNRT ablation: An underrecognized complication.

BACKGROUND: Ablation is an effective treatment for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The occurrence of junctional ectopic rhythm (JER), including junctional ectopic tachycardia, following AVNRT ablation has been described as an extremely rare phenomenon, but may be underestimated. We aimed to determine the incidence of JER following AVNRT ablation within our institution, as well as that reported in the literature via an extensive review. METHODS: We reviewed our adult ablation institutional experience for the occurrence of JER after AVNRT ablation from 2009 to 2016. Additionally, we conducted an extensive literature search using different databases looking for AVNRT ablation case series. The individually reported complications of these studies were reviewed, with a primary endpoint defined as the occurrence of JER shortly after AVNRT ablation. The study was approved by our institutional review board. RESULTS: Our institutional data revealed 6/126 patients (prevalence 4.8%) developed non-preexisting JER post-AVNRT ablation. Four patients were asymptomatic. Two patients had persistent symptoms lasting over a year, with one patient requiring repeat ablation. The literature review included 149 adult and pediatric studies. There were three cases of reported JER, out of a total of 37,541 patients (31,768 adults and 5,773 pediatric; prevalence 0.008%). The three JER patients were pediatric, and all required further therapeutic intervention. CONCLUSION: JER might be an underreported complication of AVNRT ablation. It seems most often to be transient and self-limited, occurring days to weeks after ablation, but may also be debilitating, requiring more aggressive management.