Confounders for prognostic accuracy of neuron-specific enolase after cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study.

AIM: To evaluate neuron-specific enolase (NSE) thresholds for prediction of neurological outcome after cardiac arrest and to analyze the influence of hemolysis and confounders. METHODS: Retrospective analysis from a cardiac arrest registry. Determination of NSE serum concentration and hemolysis-index (h-index) 48-96 hours after cardiac arrest. Evaluation of neurological outcome using the Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC) at hospital discharge. Separate analyses considering CPC 1-3 and CPC 1-2 as good neurological outcome. Analysis of specificity and sensitivity for poor and good neurological outcome prediction with and without exclusion of hemolytic samples (h-index larger than 50). RESULTS: Among 356 survivors three days after cardiac arrest, hemolysis was detected in 28 samples (7.9%). At a threshold of 60 µg/L, NSE predicted poor neurological outcome (CPC 4-5) in all samples with a specificity of 92% (86-95%) and sensitivity of 73% (66-79%). In non-hemolytic samples, specificity was 94% (89-97%) and sensitivity 70% (62-76%). At a threshold of 100 µg/L, specificity was 98% (95-100%, all samples) and 99% (95-100%, non-hemolytic samples), and sensitivity 58% (51-65%) and 55% (47-63%), respectively. Possible confounders for elevated NSE in patients with good neurological outcome were ECMO, malignancies, blood transfusions and acute brain diseases. Nine patients with NSE below 17 µg/L had CPC 5, all had plausible death causes other than hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. CONCLUSIONS: NSE concentrations higher than 100 µg/L predicted poor neurological outcome with high specificity. An NSE less than 17 µg/L indicated absence of severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Hemolysis and other confounders need to be considered. INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOL NUMBER: The local ethics committee (board name: Ethikkommission der Charité) approved this study by the number: EA2/066/23, approval date: 28th June 2023, study title "'ROSC' - Resuscitation Outcome Study."

Can clinical decision support systems be an asset in medical education? An experimental approach.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic accuracy is one of the major cornerstones of appropriate and successful medical decision-making. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have recently been used to facilitate physician's diagnostic considerations. However, to date, little is known about the potential assets of CDSS for medical students in an educational setting. The purpose of our study was to explore the usefulness of CDSSs for medical students assessing their diagnostic performances and the influence of such software on students' trust in their own diagnostic abilities. METHODS: Based on paper cases students had to diagnose two different patients using a CDSS and conventional methods such as e.g. textbooks, respectively. Both patients had a common disease, in one setting the clinical presentation was a typical one (tonsillitis), in the other setting (pulmonary embolism), however, the patient presented atypically. We used a 2x2x2 between- and within-subjects cluster-randomised controlled trial to assess the diagnostic accuracy in medical students, also by changing the order of the used resources (CDSS first or second). RESULTS: Medical students in their 4th and 5th year performed equally well using conventional methods or the CDSS across the two cases (t(164) = 1,30; p = 0.197). Diagnostic accuracy and trust in the correct diagnosis were higher in the typical presentation condition than in the atypical presentation condition (t(85) = 19.97; p < .0001 and t(150) = 7.67; p < .0001).These results refute our main hypothesis that students diagnose more accurately when using conventional methods compared to the CDSS. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students in their 4th and 5th year performed equally well in diagnosing two cases of common diseases with typical or atypical clinical presentations using conventional methods or a CDSS. Students were proficient in diagnosing a common disease with a typical presentation but underestimated their own factual knowledge in this scenario. Also, students were aware of their own diagnostic limitations when presented with a challenging case with an atypical presentation for which the use of a CDSS seemingly provided no additional insights.

Development of a project for interprofessional collaboration between medical and pharmacy students to improve medication safety in polypharmacy (PILLE).

Aim: Interprofessional collaboration is particularly relevant to patient safety in outpatient care with polypharmacy. The educational project "PILLE" is meant to give medical and pharmacy students an understanding of the roles and competencies needed for cooperation in the provision of healthcare and to enable interprofessional learning. Method: The curriculum is aimed at pharmacy and medical students and was developed in six steps according to the Kern cycle. It is comprised of an interprofessional seminar, a joint practical training in a simulated pharmacy, and a tandem job shadowing at a primary care practice. The project was implemented in three stages due to the pandemic: The interprofessional online seminar based on the ICAP model and the digital inverted classroom was held in the 2020 winter semester; the interprofessional practical training was added in the 2021 summer semester; and the interprofessional tandem job shadowing at a primary care practice in the 2021 winter semester. Attitudes toward interprofessional learning, among other things, was measured in the evaluation using the SPICE-2D questionnaire (Student Perceptions of Physician-Pharmacist Interprofessional Clinical Education). Results: In the first three semesters, a total of 105 students (46 pharmacy, 59 medicine) participated in the project, of which 78 participated in the evaluation (74% response rate). The students stated, in particular, that they had learned about the competencies and roles of the other profession and desired additional and more specific preparatory materials for the course sessions. The SPICE-2D questionnaire showed high values for both groups of students already in the pre-survey and these increased further as a result of the project. Conclusion: Joint case-based learning could be implemented under the conditions imposed by the pandemic. Online teaching is a low-threshold means to enable interprofessional exchange.