High prevalence of DNA damage repair gene defects and TP53 alterations in men with treatment-naïve metastatic prostate cancer -Results from a prospective pilot study using a 37 gene panel.

BACKGROUND: Defects in DNA damage repair genes characterize a subset of men with prostate cancer and provide an attractive opportunity for precision oncology approaches. The prevalence of such perturbations in newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with a high risk for lethal disease outcome, however, has not been sufficiently explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prostate cancer specimens from 67 men with newly diagnosed early onset, localized high-risk/locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer were included in this prospective pilot study. Tumor samples, including 30 prostate biopsies, were analyzed by targeted next generation sequencing using a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue-optimized 37 DNA damage repair and checkpoint gene panel. RESULTS: The drop-out rate due to an insufficient quantity of DNA was 4.5% (3 of 67 patients). In the remaining 64 patients, the rate of pathogenic DNA damage repair gene mutations was 26.6%. The highest rate of pathogenic DNA damage repair and checkpoint gene mutations was found in men with treatment-naïve metastatic prostate cancer (38.9%). In addition, a high number of likely pathogenic mutations and gene deletions were detected. Altogether, one or more pathogenic mutation, likely pathogenic mutation or gene deletion affected 43 of 64 patients (67.2%) including 29 of 36 patients (80.6%) with treatment-naïve metastatic prostate cancer. Men with metastatic prostate cancer showed a high prevalence of alterations in TP53 (36.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility, performance and clinical relevance of somatic targeted next generation sequencing using a unique 37 DNA damage repair and checkpoint gene panel under routine conditions. Our results indicate that this approach can detect actionable DNA repair gene alterations, uncommon mutations as well as mutations associated with therapy resistance in a high number of patients, in particular patients with treatment-naïve metastatic prostate cancer.

Low frequency of mismatch repair deficiency in gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is a major pathway of genomic instability in cancer. It leads to the accumulation of numerous mutations predominantly at microsatellite sequences, a phenotype known as microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI tumors have a distinct clinical behavior and commonly respond well to immune checkpoint blockade, irrespective of their origin. Data about the prevalence of MSI among gallbladder cancer (GBC) have been conflicting. We here analyzed a well-characterized cohort of 69 Western-world GBCs. METHODS: We analyzed the mononucleotide MSI marker panel consisting of BAT25, BAT26, and CAT25 to determine the prevalence of MMR deficiency-induced MSI. RESULTS: MSI was detected in 1/69 (1.4%) of analyzed GBCs. The detected MSI GBC had a classical histomorphology, i.e. of acinar/tubular/glandular pancreatobiliary phenotype, and showed nuclear expression of all four MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. The MSI GBC patient showed a prolonged overall survival, despite having a high tumor stage at diagnosis. The patient had no known background or family history indicative of Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the overall number of MSI tumors is low in GBC, the potentially therapeutic benefit of checkpoint blockade in the respective patients may justify MSI analysis of GBC.

Prognostic significance of microsatellite-instability in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Perioperative systemic treatment is standard of care for Caucasian patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric adenocarcinoma. The prognostic relevance of the microsatellite instability (MSI) status in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection is unclear. We analyzed the association of the MSI status with histological regression and clinical outcome in patients undergoing neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Tumor tissue from patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection for gastric or gastroesophageal-junction adenocarcinoma was analyzed for MSI status using a mononucleotide marker panel encompassing the markers BAT25, BAT26, and CAT25. Histological regression, relapse-free survival and overall survival were calculated and correlated with MSI status. We identified the MSI-H phenotype in 9 (8.9%) out of 101 analyzed tumors. Though a poor histological response was observed in eight out of nine MSI-H patients, overall survival was significantly better for patients with MSI-H compared to MSS tumors (median overall survival not reached vs. 38.6 months, log-rank test p = 0.014). Among MSI-H patients, an unexpected long-term survival after relapse was observed. Our data indicate that the MSI-H phenotype is a favorable prognostic marker in gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment. The benefit of perioperative cytotoxic treatment in patients with MSI-H gastric cancer, however, remains questionable. Future trials should stratify patients according to their MSI status, and novel treatment modalities focusing on MSI-H tumors should be considered.

Mismatch repair deficiency is a rare but putative therapeutically relevant finding in non-liver fluke associated cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A major molecular pathway of genetic instability in cancer is DNA mismatch repair deficiency. High-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is currently the best predictor of responsiveness towards immune checkpoint blockade. Data about the prevalence of high-level microsatellite instability in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been conflicting. METHODS: We employed a cohort comprising 308 Western-world, non-liver fluke-associated CCAs (159 intrahepatic, 106 perihilar, and 43 distal). We analysed the mononucleotide microsatellite instability marker panel consisting of BAT25, BAT26, and CAT25 and detected MSI-H in 4/308 CCAs (1.3%). RESULTS: Patients affected by MSI-H CCA had mostly an atypical histomorphology (p = 0.004), showed a longer overall survival, although having a high tumour stage, and were of younger age. Correlation analysis of microsatellite instability status with tumour-infiltrating immune cells, MHC I, and PD-L1 expression in the same cholangiocarcinoma cohort showed higher numbers of CD8 + T cells, FOXP3 + regulatory T cells, CD20 + B cells and high or at least moderate MHC I expression levels in MSI-H CCAs. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the overall number of MSI-H CCAs is low, the dismal prognosis of the disease and the therapeutic option of immune checkpoint blockade in the respective patients justify MSI testing of cholangiocarcinoma, particularly in younger patients showing an atypical histomorphology.

Successful immune checkpoint blockade in a patient with advanced stage microsatellite-unstable biliary tract cancer.

Cancers acquire multiple somatic mutations that can lead to the generation of immunogenic mutation-induced neoantigens. These neoantigens can be recognized by the host's immune system. However, continuous stimulation of immune cells against tumor antigens can lead to immune cell exhaustion, which allows uncontrolled outgrowth of tumor cells. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a novel approach to overcome immune cell exhaustion and reactivate antitumor immune responses. In particular, antibodies blocking the exhaustion-mediating programmed death receptor (PD-1)/programmed death receptor ligand (PD-L1) pathway have shown clinical efficacy. The effects were particularly pronounced in tumors with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and a high mutational load, which typically occur in the colon and endometrium. Here, we report on a 24-yr-old woman diagnosed with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who showed strong and durable response to the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, although treatment was initiated at an advanced stage of disease. The patient's tumor displayed DNA MMR deficiency and microsatellite instability (MSI) but lacked other features commonly discussed as predictors of response toward checkpoint blockade, such as PD-L1 expression or dense infiltration with cytotoxic T cells. Notably, high levels of HLA class I and II antigen expression were detected in the tumor, suggesting a potential causal relation between functionality of the tumor's antigen presentation machinery and the success of immune checkpoint blockade. We suggest determining MSI status in combination with HLA class I and II antigen expression in tumors potentially eligible for immune checkpoint blockade even in the absence of conventional markers predictive for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and in entities not commonly linked to the MSI phenotype. Further studies are required to determine the value of these markers for predicting the success of immune checkpoint blockade.

Detected, yet not Diagnosed - Breast Cancer Screening with MRI Mammography in High-Risk Women.

BACKGROUND: MRI has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive imaging method for detecting breast cancer in women at high risk, allowing depiction of cancers that are occult on mammography, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. This high sensitivity is tempered by imperfect specificity due to overlap in the features of benign and malignant lesions. CASE: We present the case of a young BRCA2 mutation carrier whose breast cancer could have been diagnosed 2 years earlier; this is a rare case of a false-negative finding in MRI. DISCUSSION: We discuss morphological, physiological and psychological reasons for underestimation of MRI sets, especially in young women. CONCLUSION: We conclude that double reading in MR screening for breast cancer in high-risk women, as conducted for mammography screening, could be considered.

Do reexcisions impair aesthetic outcome in breast conservation surgery? Exploratory analysis of a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Reexcision is a clinically relevant aspect of oncological breast conservation surgery. The influence of reexcision on aesthetic outcome is described differently in the literature. Our aim was to analyze this question in a well-defined cohort with standardized study instruments. METHODS: A total of 439 patients from a prospectively followed cohort were included in this analysis. Aesthetic results were assessed by the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) aesthetic status. Dates of assessments were shortly after surgical interventions and before surgery. Group comparison was performed between patients with reexcisions (80 cases; 18%) and patients without reexcision (359 cases; 82%). We considered variables of differing distribution between the two groups that could hypothetically influence BCTOS aesthetic status in a nonparametric analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). RESULTS: The aesthetic status of patients with reexcisions was found to be significantly worse than for patients with a single breast conservation surgery (P < 0.0001) when tested by a nonparametric ANCOVA model. Because patients with reexcisions had more noninvasive tumors (25% vs. 8%, P = 0.0001) and tumors were larger in patients with reexcision (P = 0.01), we included these variables as possible covariates in the multivariate model. The model was adjusted for the BCTOS aesthetic status before and shortly after the first surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that reexcision in breast conservation surgery impairs aesthetic outcome, at least when assessed shortly after surgery.