Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in Canadian Psychosocial Addiction Programs: A National Survey of Policy, Attitudes, and Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To describe current approaches in treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) within Canadian psychosocial outpatient, day, and residential addiction treatment programs, with an emphasis on the use of opioid agonist therapy (OAT). METHOD: An online census survey was conducted in English and French of Canadian psychosocial addiction treatment programs (N = 214). RESULTS: Programs estimated that 25% of their clients have OUD. A slight majority of programs provide some type of specialized services to clients with OUD (58%), most frequently providing or facilitating access to OAT but also specialized counselling, case management, education, and harm reduction services.Most programs reported that they admitted clients on OAT (88%) and only a minority expected or encouraged clients to taper (14%) or discontinue (6%). Programs focusing on client abstinence as the treatment goal were more likely to expect or encourage tapering or discontinuation than programs that focus on helping clients achieve personal consumption goals. Of programs that did not currently facilitate OAT, 44% indicated that they would provide OAT, but lacked the necessary accreditation, physician support, or other resources. No philosophical objections to OAT were noted.OAT initiation was provided by 30% of programs, 23% referred to another service within their organization, and 29% referred to a service outside their organization. The remaining 18% did not facilitate OAT initiation at all, ranging from 0% in Quebec to 23% in the Prairies. Overdose response kits were provided by 86% of programs. The majority not providing kits indicated willingness if policy support and resources were provided (67%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results demonstrate that psychosocial programs provide some specialized services for OUD but desire further support specifically to provide OAT, including training, knowledge, and the expertise of individuals qualified to prescribe and dispense OAT. Many psychosocial treatment programs expressed a need for staff and resources for this purpose.

Governance of mental healthcare: Fragmented accountability.

Within international healthcare systems the neglect of mental health and challenge in shifting from institutional to community care have been recurrent themes. In analysing the challenges, we focus on the case study of Canada by exploring the manner in which health law and policy evolved to inhibit community-based mental healthcare, and compare the resulting funding landscape from an international perspective. The historical institutionalist analysis draws on the literature and healthcare finance data. As a spending statute, the Canada Health Act defines the terms on which the federal government finances publicly insured provincial healthcare. Despite the goal to support physical and mental well-being by removing financial barriers to access health services, exclusion of community care offered by non-physicians (such as psychotherapy) from the terms of the Act inhibited its fulfilment. Diminished federal transfers deepened the disincentive for provinces to establish community care: mental health declined from 11 to 7 percent of provincial healthcare spending from 1979 to 2014. Governance oversight was passed to provinces whose competing demands on diminished resources limited their capacity to extend care. Accountability was found fragmented as neither government stepped-in to ensure the continuum of care, even as federal transfers were restored and evidence of cost-effectiveness grew. Although American and Canadian funding patterns are similar, other OECD countries invest between 13 and 18 percent of healthcare expenditures on mental health. Lessons from the Canadian case are the manner in which its federal structure and intergovernmental dynamics shaped health policy, and the importance of ensuring representation from a range of perspectives in policy development. Federal financial incentives were also found to profoundly impact the expansion of community-based mental healthcare. Evidence shows that public insurance for community supports would reduce healthcare expenditures and employer productivity loss, resulting in savings of $255 billion over 30 years.