[Management of coronary perforations during angioplasty]. / Gestione delle perforazioni coronariche durante angioplastica coronarica.

Coronary perforation represents a terrible complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) which, if not promptly recognized and treated, can lead to catastrophic consequences for the patient. Hence, acquisition of the basic techniques for the treatment of coronary perforations is critical for the interventional cardiologist in order to safely perform PCIs. Although the incidence of coronary perforations remains low during PCI, it is possible to recognize some subgroups of patients and some types of coronary lesions, such as chronic coronary total occlusions, that are associated with increased risk. The treatments currently available depend on the type and site of coronary perforation, therefore timely recognition is of paramount importance in order to be able to quickly establish the most appropriate treatment.

When antegrade microcatheter does not follow: The "facilitated tip-in technique".

The introduction of retrograde techniques in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) has significantly improved the success rates. After crossing the CTO lesion in the retrograde approach, wire externalization is a pivotal step to complete the PCI. Many techniques have been described to accomplish externalization in different scenarios of increasing difficulty. We describe the novel "facilitated tip-in technique" which involves the insertion of the back end of an extra-guidewire into and through the antegrade microcatheter (MC) in order to increase antegrade support and overcome demanding CTO cases where, even after successful tip-in technique, the antegrade MC does not cross the CTO segment.

Cracking the Plaque With Coronary Lithotripsy: Mechanistic Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography.

Coronary lithoplasty is a promising technique that can overcome issues regarding the treatment of undilatable, heavily calcified, de novo, and in-stent restenotic lesions, allowing plaque modification and successful stent deployment, as demonstrated by intravascular imaging.

Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the absorb bioresorbable scaffold performance for overlap versus non-overlap segments in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion: insight from the GHOST-CTO registry.

The Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) promised to avoid some of the disadvantages of its metal predecessors. Even though it has been taken off the market, limited data is available about its use in coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) and its performance in overlap segments, which would be of special research interest due to its large thickness. This data is still pertinent since the platform of bioresorbable devices has not been abandoned, with several companies working on it. We aimed to compare healing and performance between overlap (OL) and non-overlap regions (NOL) of CTO lesions treated with BVS, using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fourteen patients with overlapping BVS were included from the GHOST-CTO registry, resulting in 25 OL and 38 NOL regions. OCT based parameters were compared between OL and NOL groups at baseline (post-implantation) and 12-month follow-up. The mean age was 61.7 ± 7.2 years and 12 (86%) were males. Twelve (86%) patients underwent PCI for stable coronary artery disease and 2 (14%) had unstable angina. At 12-month follow-up, mean lumen area decreased in both NOL and OL regions, but the decrease was significantly larger in the OL region (NOL - 0.7 ± 1.33 vs. OL - 2.4 ± 1.54 mm2; p = 0.002). Mean scaffold area increased in both regions, but increased significantly more in NOL ( + 1.1 ± 1.54 vs. + 0.4 ± 1.16 mm2; p = 0.016). The percent of uncovered struts was lower in the OL group (5.0 ± 6.6% vs. 3.75 ± 8.7%, p = 0.043), whereas the percentage of malapposed struts was similar (0.3 ± 0.5% vs. 0.7 ± 2.3%, p = 0.441). Neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) was more pronounced in the OL region (0.13 ± 0.04 vs. 0.24 ± 0.10 mm2, p = 0.001). The OL and NOL segments showed comparable healing in terms of coverage and malapposition. However, NIH was more prominent in OL region. The long-term clinical implications of these findings needs further evaluation. The present study provides important insights for future development of BVS technology.

Coronary lithotripsy for failed rotational atherectomy, cutting balloon, scoring balloon, and ultra-high-pressure non-compliant balloon.

Calcified and undilatable stenosis still represents a challenge in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), due to the higher risk of suboptimal result with consequent worse clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, the dedicated technologies and devices, such as specialized balloon and atherectomy systems, do not always provide adequate plaque modification and optimal vessel preparation allowing optimal stent delivery. The intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a technology derived from urology that has been tested in peripheral and coronary calcified plaques, with promising preliminary results. We present a case of a patient undergoing planned PCI of the right coronary artery targeting an undilatable lesion, already resistant to both specialized balloons and rotational atherectomy. Using the IVL system, we were able to break the calcium, guarantying optimal stent expansion with good final result.

Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With vs Without Chronic Kidney Disease: The Impact of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with high contrast volumes, which can be particularly deleterious in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to study the outcomes of CTO PCI in subjects with vs without CKD, and the impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). METHODS: This multicentre registry included patients who underwent CTO PCI at 5 centres. CI-AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL or ≥50% from baseline within 72 hours. Study endpoints were CI-AKI, and all-cause death and target-lesion failure (TLF: cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization) on follow-up. RESULTS: Study population included 1092 patients (CKD n = 214, no CKD n = 878). Patients with CKD had more comorbidities and adverse angiographic features, compared with subjects without CKD. Patients with CKD experienced lower technical (79% vs 87%, P = 0.001) and procedural (79% vs 86%, P = 0.008) success rates. CI-AKI developed in 9.1% (CKD 15.0% vs no CKD 7.8%, P = 0.001). Rates of in-hospital need for dialysis were 0.5% vs 0%, respectively (P = 0.03). Patients with CKD had higher 24-month rates of all-cause death (11.2% vs 2.7%, P < 0.001) and new need for dialysis (1.1% vs 0.1%, P = 0.03), but similar TLF rates (12.4% vs 10.5%, P = 0.47). CI-AKI was not an independent predictor of all-cause death or TLF. CONCLUSIONS: CTO PCI in patients with CKD is associated with lower success rates and higher incidence of CI-AKI. The need for dialysis both in-hospital and on follow-up is infrequent. Although patients with CKD suffer higher rates of all-cause death, TLF rates are similar regardless of CKD status.

Impact of Incomplete Revascularization on Long-Term Outcomes Following Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

We aimed to evaluate the impact of incomplete revascularization (ICR) on long-term outcomes of patients undergoing chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Consecutive patients undergoing CTO PCI at 4 centers were included. Baseline SYNTAX score (bSS: low [≤ 22], intermediate [>22 and <33], high [≥33]), residual SYNTAX score (rSS: 0, >0 and ≤8, >8), and SYNTAX revascularization index (SRI: 100 × (bSS-rSS)/bSS: 100%, 50% to 99%, <50%) were calculated. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, any revascularization) on follow-up. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of MACEs. Overall, 686 patients were included (low bSS: n = 437; intermediate bSS: n = 187; high bSS: n = 62). Occlusion complexity, crossing strategies, and procedural success rates were similar across groups. The degree of ICR increased with higher bSS categories (rSS was 2.5 ± 4.7 in low vs 6.2 ± 9.3 in intermediate vs 9.1 ± 12.2 in high bSS, p <0.001). The SRI followed a similar pattern. Median follow-up was 781 (369 to 1,217) days. Three-year MACE rates increased with higher bSS and rSS, and decreasing SRI categories (bSS: low 19.4% vs intermediate 25.9% vs high 33.3%, p = 0.02), which was driven by a higher incidence of repeat revascularization. Compared with an rSS = 0, both an rSS >0 and ≤8 (hazard ratio 2.06, p = 0.004) and an rSS >8 (hazard ratio 3.19, p <0.001) were independent predictors of MACEs. Similar findings were observed when the SRI was entered in a separate model. In conclusion, even a mild degree of ICR is associated with a higher incidence of MACEs on long-term follow-up after CTO PCI.

Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion in Patients Who Have Undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Those Who Have Not.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the procedural and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) in patients who had undergone previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs those who had not, and to evaluate the role of the Registry of CrossBoss and Hybrid procedures in France, the Netherlands, Belgium, and United Kingdom (RECHARGE) score in predicting acute and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We compiled a multicentre registry of consecutive patients undergoing CTO PCI at 7 centres between January 2009 and April 2017. The primary end point was target-vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization on follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 2058 patients were included (patients who underwent CABG, n = 401; CABG-naïve patients, n = 1657). Patients who had undergone CABG were older and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher occlusion complexity (RECHARGE score, 3.6 ± 1.3 vs 1.8 ± 1.2; P < 0.001). Antegrade dissection/re-entry techniques and the retrograde approach were used more frequently in patients who had undergone CABG. Procedural metrics were worse, and technical (82% vs 88%; P = 0.001) and procedural (81% vs 87%; P = 0.001) success was lower in patients who had undergone CABG. They also experienced a higher rate of major complications (3.7% vs 1.5%; P = 0.004). The RECHARGE score was inversely associated with technical success (P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 377 days (interquartile range, 277-766 days). The 24-month TVF rate was higher in patients who had undergone CABG than in CABG-naïve patients (16.1% vs 9.0%; P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the RECHARGE score (hazard ratio, 1.61; P < 0.001) remained an independent predictor of TVF, together with longer total stent length and not using a drug-eluting stent. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CABG-naïve patients, CTO PCI in patients who had undergone CABG shows higher procedural complexity, worse success rates, and higher adjusted risk of TVF on follow-up.

Vascular response and healing profile of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: A one-year optical coherence tomography analysis from the GHOST-CTO registry.

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been heralded with potential benefits that are especially desired in long lesions, including chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Procedural feasibility and mid-term outcomes of BVS in CTOs have been reported. However, there is still a paucity of data regarding the vascular and healing response to BVS in CTOs evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This study included prospectively 21 patients who had a CTO lesion treated with a BVS. Angiography and OCT scan were recorded at either post-implantation and 1-year follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography and OCT analyses were performed by an independent core laboratory. RESULTS: The angiographic analysis showed a significant increase in the percentage of in-segment diameter stenosis at 1year (11.89±9.5% vs. 21.84±11.7%; p=0.002). The OCT analysis showed a trend (p=0.07) towards increased mean scaffold area and significant reductions in mean lumen diameter (3.1±0.36mm vs. 2.85±0.47mm; p=0.0046), mean lumen area (7.8±1.73mm2 vs. 6.76±2mm2; p=0.0082) and minimal lumen area (5.26±1.86mm2 vs. 3.56±1.52mm2; p<0.0001). Malapposition area and volume decreased from 0.26±0.17mm2 to 0.08±0.1mm2 (p=0.0003) and from 14.17±12.92mm3 to 3.99±4.46mm3 (p=0.0014), respectively. The rate of uncovered or malapposed struts, measured at the frame level, was 5.29±6.48% at 1year. CONCLUSIONS: In a small series of CTO patients treated with BVS implantation, OCT outcomes at 1year displayed an overall favorable vascular response and healing profile.

Procedural and Long-Term Outcomes of Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Chronic Total Occlusions: The BONITO Registry (Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Chronic Total Occlusions).

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) for the percutaneous treatment of chronic total occlusions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a multicenter registry of consecutive chronic total occlusion patients treated with BRS (Absorb; Abbott Vascular) and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) at 5 institutions. Long-term target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization) was the primary end point. Inverse probability of treatment weight-adjusted Cox regression was used to account for pretreatment differences between the 2 groups. A total of 537 patients (n=153 BRS; n=384 DES) were included. BRS patients were younger and had lower prevalence of comorbidities. Overall mean Japan-Chronic Total Occlusion (J-CTO) score was 1.43±1.16, with no differences between groups. Procedural success was achieved in 99.3% and 96.6% of BRS- and DES-treated patients, respectively (P=0.07). At a median follow-up of 703 days, there were no differences in target-vessel failure between BRS and DES (4.6% versus 7.7%; P=0.21). By adjusted Cox regression analysis, there were still no significant differences between BRS and DES (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-3.72; P=0.34). However, secondary analyses suggested a signal toward higher ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization with BRS. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of BRS versus second-generation DES in chronic total occlusion was associated with similar risk of target-vessel failure at long-term follow-up. However, a signal toward increased ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization with BRS was observed. Large randomized studies should confirm these findings.