Wellbeing and mental health outcomes amongst hospital healthcare workers during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Global healthcare systems have been particularly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are widely reported to have experienced increased levels of baseline psychological distress relative to the general population, and the COVID-19 pandemic may have had an additive effect. However, previous studies are typically restricted to physicians and nurses with limited data available on hospital HCWs. We aimed to conduct a cross-sectional, psychological evaluation of Irish HCWs during COVID-19. METHODS: HCWs across five adult acute level-4 Dublin-based hospitals completed an online survey of wellbeing and COVID-19 experience. RESULTS: There were 1898 HCWs who commenced the survey representing 10% of the total employee base. The sample comprised nurses (33%), doctors (21%), Health and Social Care Professionals (HSCPs) (24%) and 'Other' disciplines (22%), and 81% identified as female. Clinical levels of depression, anxiety and PTSD symptoms were endorsed by 31%, 34% and 28% of respondents, respectively. Professional grouping effects included: nurses reporting significantly greater levels of COVID-19 exposure, infection, COVID-fear, moral injury, and post-traumatic distress; HSCPs were significantly less likely to report mood dysfunction. In terms of gender, males were significantly less likely to report negative pandemic experiences, low resilience, and significantly more likely to endorse 'minimal' depression, anxiety, and traumatic distress. Logistic regression modelling revealed mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety and PTSD symptoms) were associated with increased frontline exposure, fewer career years' experience, elevated pre-pandemic stress, and female gender. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest evaluation of psychological wellbeing amongst HCWs in acute hospitals in the Dublin region. Our findings have implications for healthcare workforce wellbeing and future service delivery.

Validation and psychometric evaluation of a brief screening questionnaire for psychological distress in patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psoriasis are at risk of a co-morbid diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety. It is therefore essential for dermatologists to have valid and effective instruments that can screen and monitor depression and anxiety symptoms in psoriasis patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) as a brief measure that can be used to evaluate psychological distress related to anxiety and depression in psoriasis patients. METHODS: The sample included 76 adult dermatological outpatients diagnosed with psoriasis. Participants completed the MHI-5, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and six subscales of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to examine the factor structure of MHI-5. Convergent validity was examined by applying correlations among all measures. Discriminant validity was examined by applying hierarchical regression models. Reliability was examined by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the proposed one-factor model has a good fit to the data. The MHI-5 demonstrated satisfactory convergent validity by yielding significant moderate to strong correlations with the HADS and with the positive and negative subscales of the SCS. Discriminant validity was also evident with being at risk of anxiety predicting MHI-5 scores above and beyond the effect of gender and age. Hierarchical regressions were not performed because a very small number of participants (n = 3) were classified at risk of depression. The MHI-5 showed high internal consistency (α = 0.84). CONCLUSION: This investigation provided evidence that MHI-5 is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used to effectively capture psychological distress in psoriasis patients.