Does holiday hypoglycaemia exist?

BACKGROUND: To determine whether an excessive, prolonged and, above all, unusual physical exertion could be associated with episodes of mild hypoglycaemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients treated with glibenclamide. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 11 months of observation with retrospective analysis of patient personal diaries to determine the hypoglycaemic risk. SETTING: Diabetic Unit-Department of Medicine and Aging-Chieti University School of Medicine. PATIENTS: We enrolled 340 NIDDM outpatients adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, alcohol intake and oral treatment regimen with glibenclamide. PATIENTS were tested monthly for circadian blood glucose profiles and glycosylated hemoglobin. Mild hypoglycaemia was defined on the basis of blood glucose values < 2.8 mmol/l associated with mild autonomic symptoms, without requiring external assistance. Each diabetic patient filled personal diary indicating the therapy regimen and the characteristics of eventual hypoglycaemic episodes occurring during the observation period. RESULTS: 21.8% of NIDDM patients experienced one or two episodes of mild hypoglycaemia during the observation period. The analysis of the patients' diaries showed that 60% of the hypoglycaemic episodes was associated with excessive, prolonged and unexpected physical exertions. Within this group, about 70% of the episodes occurred during a holiday ("holiday hypoglycaemia"). After analyzing the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the diabetic patients reporting hypoglycaemic events, we found a higher risk for "holiday hypoglycaemia" in patients with a lower educational level, with a sedentary occupation or among the ex-farmers. CONCLUSIONS: As resulted in the present study, unexpected physical exertions may represent a relevant cause of mild hypoglycaemia in diabetic patients receiving oral antidiabetic therapy. However, this hypoglycaemic cause may have been underestimated in the literature. Educational programs conducted by general practitioners or diabetologists could be useful for the patients in reducing the number of mild hypoglycaemic episodes.

Subclinical coeliac disease is a frequent cause of iron-deficiency anaemia.

BACKGROUND: Although it is known that anaemia may be the only presenting symptom in coeliac disease, prevalence figures of unsuspected coeliac disease in anaemic patients are not available. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical usefulness of antigliadin and antiendomysial antibody tests in the diagnostic algorithm of anaemic patients. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive anaemic patients were tested for antigliadin antibodies, and those positive were also tested for antiendomysial antibodies. All patients positive for antigliadin and antiendomysial antibodies underwent intestinal biopsy. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were antigliadin antibody-positive, and 10 were also antiendomysial antibody-positive. In all 10 a jejunal biopsy was consistent with coeliac disease (prevalence, 5%). This prevalence rose to 8.5% when patients with macrocytic anaemia or with microcytic anaemia due to previous bleeding or responsive to oral iron therapy were excluded from the calculation. CONCLUSIONS: Coeliac disease is a frequent cause of iron-deficiency anaemia, and antigliadin and antiendomysial antibody tests should be always performed in the diagnostic algorithm of anaemic patients.

Pirenzepine in the treatment of benign gastroduodenal diseases. A double-blind controlled clinical trial.

Pirenzepine (PRZ, 75 mg/day for 10 days followed by 50 mg/day for 20 days) was compared with placebo (PL) in the treatment of endoscopically confirmed active gastroduodenitis or duodenal ulcer and with carbenoxolone (CB, 300 mg/day followed by 200 mg/day) in the treatment of gastric ulcer in a 30-day double-blind clinical trial. Ninety-seven of 112 outpatients completed the trial. The results can be summarized as follows: a) Gastroduodenitis. Complete normalization of the endoscopic picture was observed in 61% of the 28 patients on PRZ and in 30% of the 27 on PL. b) Duodenal ulcer. Complete endoscopic healing was observed in 75% of the 12 patients on PRZ and in 44% of the 9 on PL. In both studied PRZ induced improvement in clinical symptoms in more patients than PL. c) Gastric ulcer. PRZ and CB induced complete healing in a similar percentage of patients (64% of 11 and 70% of 10 patients). Better results in dyspepsia were observed in the PRZ group than the CB group. No major side-effects and no pathological changes in blood and urine analyses were observed in PRZ-treated patients.