Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

STUDY DESIGN: A radiographic assessment has been developed to include coronal, sagittal, and axial parameters. OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation of postoperative radiographic results and percentage postoperative radiographic improvement with patient clinical self-assessment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: With the increasing interest in outcome studies, the authors wanted to determine whether Scoliosis Research Society clinical questionnaire results would correlate with objective radiographic improvement. INCLUSION CRITERIA: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with anterior or posterior instrumentation, a solid fusion, minimum 2-year follow-up, and a completed postoperative Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire. Seventy-eight patients met the criteria. Measurements included in the radiographic score: Cobb angles of the coronal curve, C7 to the center sacral vertical line, apical translation, apical vertebral rotation, T1 rib angle, end-instrumented vertebrae angulation, angulation of the disc below the end-instrumented vertebra, and curve type. Sagittal measurements included T2-T12, T5-T12, T2-T5, T12-L2, and L1-S1. RESULTS: The preoperative radiographic score of these 78 patients was mean 60.1 +/- 9.7 (range 41-88, maximum radiographic score, 100). The 2-year postoperative radiographic score was mean 83.8 +/- 8.8 (range, 65-100). The median Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire score was 98 +/- 12.3 (range, 58-116, maximum score, 125, showing that the patient is highly satisfied and asymptomatic). The postoperative radiographic score versus the questionnaire score showed a Spearman rank correlation of 0.04 (P = 0.68, little or no correlation throughout). Percentage improvement of the radiographic score versus the questionnaire score showed a Spearman rank correlation of 0.1 (P = 0.38, little or no correlation throughout). CONCLUSION: In this initial group of patients, the radiographic assessment shows a significant improvement between preoperative and 2-year postoperative scores. However, little correlation between the radiographic assessment and the questionnaire scores was found in this adolescent population, suggesting that separate analyses of radiographic and clinical outcome data are required when evaluating results of postoperative scoliosis surgery.

The effect of continued posterior spinal growth on sagittal contour in patients treated by anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of radiographs on a prospective cohort of patients undergoing anterior instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the change in sagittal profile after growth. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The authors previously reported some advantages of anterior instrumentation for treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. However, postsurgery hyperkyphosis has resulted in some patients, especially those who were skeletally immature at the time of surgery. METHODS: Inclusion criteria required that participants have thoracic idiopathic scoliosis treated with anterior instrumentation and a confirmed solid fusion, no rod breakage, and a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. The 47 patients meeting the criteria were divided into a study group of 10 patients who were Risser 0 at the time of surgery and a control group of 37 patients who were Risser 1 to 5. Progressive sagittal kyphosis was defined as an increase of 10 degrees or more (T5-T12) after surgery. RESULTS: Sagittal progression greater than 10 degrees (average, 15 degrees ) occurred in 6 of 10 patients (60%) in the study group (Risser 0). Five patients progressed from 10 degrees to 19 degrees, and one patient from 20 degrees to 30 degrees. In contrast, sagittal progression occurred in only 10 of 37 patients (27%) in the control group (Risser 1 to 5). CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with anterior instrumentation may be at risk for progressive sagittal kyphosis secondary to growth. Skeletal immaturity (Risser 0) appears to be a risk factor. In these immature patients, preserving the sagittal profile with intervertebral spacers, rigid rods, and bone graft (allowing for an average 15 degrees increase of kyphosis with growth) may be appropriate.