Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
In Vivo ; 34(3 Suppl): 1685-1694, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32503830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite the large amount of clinical data available of Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19), not many studies have been conducted about the psychological toll on Health Care Workers (HCWs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicentric descriptive study, surveys were distributed among 4 different Breast Cancer Centers (BCC). BCCs were distinguished according to COVID-19 tertiary care hospital (COVID/No-COVID) and district prevalence (DP) (High vs. Low). DASS-21 score, PSS score and demographic data (age, sex, work) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 51 HCWs were analyzed in the study. Age, work and sex did not demonstrate statistically significant values. Statistically significant distribution was found between DASS-21-stress score and COVID/No-COVID (p=0.043). No difference was found in the remaining DASS-21 and PSS scores, dividing the HCWs according to COVID-19-hospital and DP. CONCLUSION: Working in a COVID-19-hospital represents a factor that negatively affects psychosocial well-being. However, DP seems not to affect the psychosocial well-being of BCC HCWs. During the outbreak, psychological support for low risk HCWs should be provided regardless DP.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Cancer Care Facilities , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Patient Care Team , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Adult , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Occupational Stress/etiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Prevalence , Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Psychosocial Support Systems , Rome , Severity of Illness Index , Tertiary Care Centers , Uncertainty , Workload
2.
In Vivo ; 34(3): 1125-1132, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32354901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: In 2016, in the United States, more than 50% of breast cancer (BC) cases were diagnosed in patients older than 60 years of age. Our study aimed to estimate the risk of locoregional recurrence (LR) in patients who underwent breast-conservative treatment (BCT), according to age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study analyzed 613 cases of patients who underwent BCT between 2003 and 2014. Patients were divided into groups according to age: Under70 (under 70 years old) and Over70 (above 70 years old). Margins width, histology results, prognostic and predictive factors were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients who experienced LR. RESULTS: LR Incidence among Under70 and Over70 was 5.4% and 1.7%, respectively (p<0.01). Group Over70 is characterized by larger tumors and a lower Ki67 index (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Operation time reduction, better aesthetic results and reduced LR risk support BCT. The Over70 group exhibited better outcomes in terms of LR despite larger tumor dimensions.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Postoperative Care , Prognosis , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Risk
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL