Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 11(10): 1558-61, 2005 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15770738

ABSTRACT

AIM: To present our experience of laparoscopic Heller stretching myotomy followed by His angle reconstruction as surgical approach to esophageal achalasia. METHODS: Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy; an anterior partial fundoplication in 17, and angle of His reconstruction in 15 cases represented the antireflux procedure of choice. RESULTS: There were no morbidity and mortality recorded in both anterior funduplication and angle of His reconstruction groups. No differences were detected in terms of recurrent dysphagia, p.o. reflux or medical therapy. CONCLUSION: To reduce the incidence of recurrent achalasia after laparoscopic Heller myotomy, we believe that His' angle reconstruction is a safe and effective alternative to the anterior fundoplication.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophagus/surgery , Fundoplication , Laparoscopy , Muscle, Smooth/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 23(6): 547-9, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9484928

ABSTRACT

Permanent central venous access devices (PCVAD) are used widely in the management of chronically ill patients, particularly in neoplastic diseases. The standard approach consists of positioning the catheter in the superior vena cava (SVC) either using subclavian or internal jugular vein puncture, or cephalic or external jugular vein cut-down, with the port implanted in a subcutaneous pouch of the thoracic region. Alternative insertion sites could be used in selected cases. In our experience, consisting of 158 PCVAD, 12 cases required a different insertion site: six cases of an SVC catheter and port on the forearm using a basilic vein cut-down, and six cases of an inferior vena cava (IVC) catheter and port in the abdominal region using a great saphenous vein cut-down. Comparing standard to alternative approaches, we observed a total morbidity rate of 8.9% and 8.3%, respectively (P=NS), while the explant rate was 5.4% vs 8.3% (P=0.1). Our data show non-significant differences in morbidity and explant rates between the two groups of patients. Alternative insertion sites for the PCVAD implant seem to be a valid possibility in the management of chronically ill patients.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...