Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Med Mal Infect ; 42(3): 102-9, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22341664

ABSTRACT

Prosthetic vascular graft infection is a rare but very severe complication with a high death rate. Its optimal management requires appropriate surgical procedures combined with adequate antimicrobial treatment in reference center. The authors wanted to focus on the management of prosthetic vascular graft infection and define the clinical, microbiological, biological, and radiological criteria of vascular graft infection. Complementary investigations, although these are small series, include CT scan, the gold standard for the diagnosis of acute infection with a sensitivity and specificity reaching 100%, but decreased to 55% in case of chronic infection. More recently, PET-scanning was studied and yielded good results in chronic infections (sensitivity 98%, specificity 75.6%, positive predictive value 88.5%, and negative predictive value 84.4%). Managing prosthetic vascular graft infection, as with the orthopedic and vascular infections, requires replacing the vascular prosthesis. There is no correlation between the microbiological data and the location or type of vascular infection. Thus, the postoperative intravenous antibiotherapy should be bactericidal with a broad-spectrum. After obtaining intra-operative microbiological results, de-escalation therapy must include at least one anti-adherence agent, such as rifampicin in staphylococcal infections.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Aftercare , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Adhesion/drug effects , Bacterial Infections/blood , Bacterial Infections/diagnostic imaging , Bacterial Infections/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Contrast Media , Device Removal , Disease Management , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Positron-Emission Tomography , Predictive Value of Tests , Prosthesis-Related Infections/blood , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Reoperation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography, Doppler
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 18(4): 352-8, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21883666

ABSTRACT

Prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) is a devastating complication, with a mortality rate of up to 75%, which is especially caused by aortic graft infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with in-hospital mortality of patients with definite graft infection, and with long-term outcome. We reviewed medical records of 85 patients treated for PVGIs defined by positive bacterial culture of intraoperative specimens or blood samples, and/or clinical, biological and radiological signs of infection. In-hospital patient mortality was defined as any death occurring during the initial treatment of the graft infection. Cure was defined as the absence of evidence of relapsing infection during long-term follow-up (≥1 year). Eighty-five patients (54 aortic and 31 limb graft infections) treated by surgical debridement and removal of the infected prosthesis (n=41), surgical debridement without removal of prosthesis (n=34) or antimicrobial treatment without surgery (n=10) were studied. The only microbiological difference observed between patients with early (occurring within 4 months after surgery) vs. late PVGI and between those with aortic vs. limb PVGI was the incidence of PVGI caused by Staphylococcus aureus, which was greater in patients with limb PVGI. Overall cure was observed in 93.2% of 59 patients with a follow-up of a minimum of 1 year. Overall in-hospital mortality was 16.5% (n=14). Two variables were independently associated with mortality: age >70 years (OR 9.1, 95% CI 1.83-45.43, p 0.007) and aortic graft infection (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.1-28.7, p 0.037).


Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/pathogenicity , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/mortality , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/mortality , Prosthesis-Related Infections/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/pathogenicity , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Hospitals , Humans , Incidence , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/pathology , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...