Oxidative base damage to DNA: specificity of base excision repair enzymes.

Base excision repair (BER) is likely to be the main mechanism involved in the enzymatic restoration of oxidative base lesions within the DNA of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Emphasis was placed in early studies on the determination of the ability of several bacterial DNA N-glycosylases, including Escherichia coli endonuclease III (endo III) and formamidopyrimidine DNA N-glycosylase (Fpg), to recognize and excise several oxidized pyrimidine and purine bases. More recently, the availability of related DNA repair enzymes from yeast and human has provided new insights into the enzymatic removal of several.OH-mediated modified DNA bases. However, it should be noted that most of the earlier studies have involved globally modified DNA as the substrates. This explains, at least partly, why there is a paucity of accurate kinetic data on the excision rate of most of the modified bases. Interestingly, several oxidized pyrimidine and purine nucleosides have been recently inserted into defined sequence oligonucleotides. The use of the latter substrates, together with overexpressed DNA N-glycosylases, allows detailed studies on the efficiency of the enzymatic release of the modified bases. This was facilitated by the development of accurate chromatographic and mass spectrometric methods aimed at measuring oxidized bases and nucleosides. As one of the main conclusions, it appears that the specificity of both endo III and Fpg proteins is much broader than expected a few years ago.

Repair and replication of oxidized DNA bases using modified oligodeoxyribonucleotides.

Modified oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODNs) are powerful tools to assess the biological significance of oxidized lesions to DNA. For this purpose, we developed original synthetical pathways for the site-specific insertion of several oxidized bases into DNA fragments. Thus, the chemical solid-phase synthesis of ODNs using original strategies of protection and mild conditions of deprotection, as well as a specific post-oxidation approach of an unique nucleoside residue within the sequence have been applied. These two approaches of preparation allowed us to have access to a set of modified ODNs that contain a single modified nucleoside, i.e., N-(2-deoxy-beta-D-erythro-pentofuranosyl)formylamine (dF), 5-hydroxy-2'-deoxycytidine (5-OHdCyd), thymidine glycol (dTg), 5,6-dihydrothymidine (DHdThd), 2,2-diamino-4-[(2-deoxy-beta-D-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-amino]-5(2H)- oxazolone (dZ), N-(2-deoxy-beta-D-erythro-pentofuranosyl)cyanuric acid (dY), 5',8-cyclo-2'-deoxyguanosine (cyclodGuo) and 5',8-cyclo-2'-deoxyadenosine (cyclodAdo). The substrates were used to investigate recognition and removal of the lesions by bacterial DNA N-glycosylases, including endonuclease III (endo III) and Fapy glycosylase (Fpg). In addition, the DNA polymerase-mediated nucleotide incorporation opposite the damage was determined using modified ODNs as templates.

Excision of 5,6-dihydroxy-5,6-dihydrothymine, 5,6-dihydrothymine, and 5-hydroxycytosine from defined sequence oligonucleotides by Escherichia coli endonuclease III and Fpg proteins: kinetic and mechanistic aspects.

Oligonucleotides that contain a single modified pyrimidine, i.e., thymine glycol (Tg), 5,6-dihydrothymine (DHT), and 5-hydroxycytosine (5-OHC) were synthesized in order to investigate the substrate specificity and the excision mechanism of two Escherichia coli repair enzymes: endonuclease III and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg). Three techniques of analysis were employed. A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) assay with HPLC prepurification was used to quantify the release of the modified bases, while polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization-mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) provided insights into the mechanism of oligonucleotide cleavage. Values of Vm/Km constants lead to the conclusion that the substrates are processed by endonuclease III with the following preference: Tg >> 5-OHC > DHT. This confirms that Tg is an excellent substrate for endonuclease III. Fpg-mediated cleavage of the 5-OHC-containing oligonucleotide is processed at the same rate than endonuclease III. Furthermore, Fpg was found to have a little but relevant activity on DHT-containing oligonucleotide, thus broadening the substrate specificity of this enzyme to a new modified pyrimidine. While 5-OHC-containing oligonucleotides are cleaved by the two enzymes, no or a small amount of the modified base was found to be released, as determined by GC-MS. From these data it may be suggested that 5-OHC could be modified during its enzymatic excision. Finally, MALDI-MS analyses shed new light on the mechanism of action of endonuclease III: the molecular masses of the repaired fragments of 5-OHC- and DHT-containing oligonucleotides showed that endonuclease III cleaves the DNA backbone mainly through a hydrolytic process and that no beta-elimination product was detected.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with high-performance liquid chromatography prepurification for monitoring the endonuclease III-mediated excision of 5-hydroxy-5,6-dihydrothymine and 5,6-dihydrothymine from gamma-irradiated DNA.

The endonuclease III from Escherichia coli is a repair enzyme which exhibits both a glycosylase and an endonuclease function. The activity of the enzyme can be assayed by measuring the released targeted bases in solution from a sample of modified DNA. In the present study, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used together with an HPLC prepurification step in order to single out the released bases. The prepurification was found to enhance the specificity and the sensitivity of the assay. Thus, the overall method allowed us to analyze separately 5-hydroxy-5,6-dihydrothymine from the cis and trans isomers of 6-hydroxy-5,6-dihydrothymine. Examples of application of the assay are provided with the measurement of the E. coli endonuclease III-mediated excision of 5-hydroxy-5,6-dihydrothymine and 5,6-dihydrothymine from samples of gamma-irradiated DNA in the presence of cysteine.

Opposite base-dependent excision of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoadenine by the Ogg1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The yOgg1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a DNA glycosylase/AP lyase that excises guanine lesions such as 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-OxoG) and 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-N-methylformamidopyrimidine (me-Fapy-G) and incises apurinic/apyrimidinic sites (AP sites) in damaged DNA. The yOgg1 protein displays a marked preference for DNA duplexes containing 8-OxoG or AP sites placed opposite cytosine. In this paper, we show that yOgg1 can also excise an adenine lesion, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoadenine (8-OxoA), when paired with cytosine or 5-methylcytosine. In contrast, yOgg1 does not release 8-OxoA when placed opposite thymine, adenine, guanine or uracil. The specificity constants (Kcat/Km) for repair of 8-OxoG/C and 8-OxoA/C duplexes are (50 +/- 18) x 10(-3) and (13 +/- 3) x 10(-3)/min/nM, respectively. The catalytic mechanism for strand cleavage at 8-OxoA/C involves excision of 8-OxoA by the DNA glycosylase activity of yOgg1, followed by incision at the newly formed AP site via a beta-elimination reaction. Furthermore, cleavage of 8-OxoA/C involves formation of a reaction intermediate that is converted into a stable covalent adduct in the presence of sodium borohydride (NaBH4). The yOgg1 protein binds strongly to the 8-OxoA/C duplex, as demonstrated by an apparent dissociation constant (Kdapp) value of 45 nM, as determined by gel mobility shift assay. In contrast, the yOgg1 protein has a very low binding affinity for the 8-OxoA/T duplex, a Kdapp value of 680 nM, which in turn can explain the lack of repair of 8-OxoA in this duplex. The capacity of other DNA glycosylases/AP lyases to repair 8-OxoA has also been investigated. The results show that human hOgg1 protein efficiently repairs 8-OxoA placed opposite cytosine or 5-methylcytosine. On the other hand, the Fpg protein of Escherichia coli cleaves 8-OxoA/C at a very slow rate as compared with yOgg1.

Facts and artifacts in the measurement of oxidative base damage to DNA.

This short survey is aimed at critically evaluating the main available methods for measuring oxidative base damage within cellular DNA. Emphasis is placed on separative methods which are currently widely applied. These mostly concern high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC) associated with sensitive detection techniques such as electrochemistry (EC) and mass spectrometry (MS). In addition, the comparison is extended to 32p-postlabeling methods, immunoassays and measurement of two main classes of oxidative DNA damage within isolated cells. It may be concluded that the HPLC-electrochemical detection (ECD) method, even if restricted to the measurement of only a few electroactive oxidized bases and nucleosides, is the simplest and safest available method at the moment. In contrast, the more versatile GC-MS method, which requires a HPLC pre-purification step in order to prevent artifactual oxidation of overwhelming normal bases to occur during derivatization, is more tedious and its sensitivity may be questionable. Alternative simpler procedures of background prevention for the GC-MS assay, which, however, remain to be validated, include low-temperature for derivatization and addition of antioxidants to the silylating reagents. Interestingly, similar levels of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine were found in cellular DNA using HPLC-ECD, HPLC-MS/MS and HPLC/32P-postlabeling methods. However, it should be noted that the level of cellular 8-oxodGuo, thus determined, is on average basis 10-fold higher than that was inferred for more indirect measurement involving the use of DNA repair enzymes with methods on isolated cells. Further efforts should be made to resolve this apparent discrepancy. In addition, the question of the biological validation of the non-invasive measurement of oxidized bases and nucleosides in urine is addressed.