Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 95(8): 573-6, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24165339

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of changing the default knee prosthesis in a high volume dedicated arthroplasty unit from DePuy's PFC(®) Sigma(®) to Smith & Nephew's Genesis™ II. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of prospective data on primary total knee replacements (TKRs) from January 2009 until December 2011. This provided information on the operative time, length of stay, pain at mobilisation, radiography analysis, any complications, and readmission at 30 and 60 days. RESULTS: The total numbers of primary TKRs using the PFC(®) and Genesis™ II prostheses were 1,061 and 1,268 respectively. The results showed a slight increase (maximum of five minutes) in the operative time for all the surgeons except one surgeon, whose operative time reduced by an average of seven minutes. There was no significant adverse outcome after the change in the knee implant. There was no clinically significant increase in the length of stay, pain at mobilisation or complication rates. There was a twofold increase in the wastage of the implant in the Genesis™ II group in the initial learning period. CONCLUSIONS: Through a competitive process of implant tendering, we have successfully introduced a new implant into a large elective orthopaedic unit. This has resulted in significant financial savings without adversely affecting our clinical practice or patient outcome.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Knee Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Knee Prosthesis/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Operative Time , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Reoperation/economics , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Anaesthesia ; 64(11): 1241-5, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19825061

ABSTRACT

This case series details experience of critical care admissions with pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza from an intensive care unit in the West Midlands. We present four critically ill patients admitted with severe hypoxia. Two of the patients failed a trial of continuous positive airway pressure and all underwent controlled ventilation within 24 h of admission. Bilevel and high frequency oscillatory ventilation were the most useful modes. Our patients generally had one organ failure and were ventilator dependent for relatively short periods of time. Three of the patients made a full recovery and one required ongoing dialysis. We also discuss service planning and our response to the pandemic. We were well prepared with stocks of personal protective equipment but had to modify plans as the outbreak progressed. Our cases and discussion provide useful information for other intensive care units preparing for the predicted autumn surge of H1N1 cases.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/therapy , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Adult , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Respiration, Artificial/methods , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...