ABSTRACT
The number of short-stay surgery procedures has progressively increased since the concept of short-stay surgery was first introduced. Initially this type of surgery was reserved for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, proctological surgery, and various minor procedures. Careful patient selection makes it possible to apply one-day surgery to other surgical specialties including breast cancer surgery. Reducing the length of hospital stay lowers health care costs, and shortens waiting lists. The most important benefits for patients are a more rapid return to work and positive psychological effects. Exclusion criteria for one-day surgery are the lack of home care, excessive distance from place of treatment and the presence of any concomitant pathology that is a contraindication to this type of surgery. We report our experience in oncological surgery of the breast in one-day surgery.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Hernia, Inguinal , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/economics , Breast Neoplasms , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Humans , Length of Stay , Waiting ListsABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy and tolerability of low dose spinal anesthesia during operative hysteroscopy in a group of patients with high surgical risks. DESIGN: Case series study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). SETTING: Tertiary centers for women health care. PATIENTS: A total of 47 women affected by endometrial polyps (n = 32), myomas (n = 8), and abnormal uterine bleeding (n = 7) scheduled for inpatient operative hysteroscopy. INTERVENTIONS: Transvaginal ultrasonography; office diagnostic hysteroscopy; preoperative evaluation of American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) classification; inpatient operative hysteroscopy; low-dose spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine; compilation of a questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Practicability and patients' subjective experiences with spinal anesthesia; duration of cervical dilation and for operative hysteroscopy; infusion volume needed; incidence of surgical complications. RESULTS: Resectoscopy was performed in all patients, with the exception of 1 woman (2.1%) in which spinal anesthesia was unsuccessful. No statistically significant differences were noted among groups in terms of intra- and peri-operative findings. Sensory block induced by spinal anesthesia was suitable for surgery in all patients, and side effects occurred far less frequently than mentioned in the literature. Data reported in the questionnaire revealed that 93.5% of women would choose a spinal anesthesia again for a potential operative hysteroscopy in the future, since for 89.1% of them long lasting anesthesia is of relevance. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose spinal anesthesia is a feasible technique in the inpatient setting for operative hysteroscopy in women with high surgical risks.
Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Anesthesia/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Spinal , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Hysteroscopy , Adult , Female , Humans , Leiomyoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Polyps/surgery , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Hemorrhage/surgery , Uterine Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Transanal haemorroidal dearterialisation (THD) is a nonexcisional surgical technique for the treatment of piles, consisting in the ligation of the distal branches of the superior rectal artery, resulting in a reduction of blood flow and decongestion of the haemorroidal plexus. THD for 2 degrees and 3 degrees degree haemorroids is highly effective and painless. There are few complications and the technique can be performed as a day case.
