Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
ESMO Open ; 8(6): 102062, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38070434

ABSTRACT

Cancer management has significantly evolved in recent years, focusing on a multidisciplinary team approach to provide the best possible patient care and address the various comorbidities, toxicities, and complications that may arise during the patient's treatment journey. The co-occurrence of diabetes and cancer presents a significant challenge for health care professionals worldwide. Management of these conditions requires a holistic approach to improve patients' overall health, treatment outcomes, and quality of life, preventing diabetes complications and cancer treatment side-effects. In this article, a multidisciplinary panel of experts from different Italian scientific societies provide a critical overview of the co-management of cancer and diabetes, with an increasing focus on identifying a novel specialty field, 'diabeto-oncology', and suggest new co-management models of cancer patients with diabetes to improve their care. To better support cancer patients with diabetes and ensure high levels of coordinated care between oncologists and diabetologists, 'diabeto-oncology' could represent a new specialized field that combines specific expertise, skills, and training.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Neoplasms , Humans , Quality of Life , Consensus , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Medical Oncology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Italy/epidemiology
2.
ESMO Open ; 8(3): 101573, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37263082

ABSTRACT

Increasing evidence suggests that patients with diabetes, particularly type 2 diabetes (T2D), are characterized by an increased risk of developing different types of cancer, so cancer could be proposed as a new T2D-related complication. On the other hand, cancer may also increase the risk of developing new-onset diabetes, mainly caused by anticancer therapies. Hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and chronic inflammation typical of T2D could represent possible mechanisms involved in cancer development in diabetic patients. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a subset of non-coding RNAs, ⁓22 nucleotides in length, which control the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression through both translational repression and messenger RNA degradation. Of note, miRNAs have multiple target genes and alteration of their expression has been reported in multiple diseases, including T2D and cancer. Accordingly, specific miRNA-regulated pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of both conditions. In this review, a panel of experts from the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD), Italian Society of Diabetology (SID), Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), and Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) provide a critical view of the evidence about the involvement of miRNAs in the pathophysiology of both T2D and cancer, trying to identify the shared miRNA signature and pathways able to explain the strong correlation between the two conditions, as well as to envision new common pharmacological approaches.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , MicroRNAs , Neoplasms , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/therapy , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Insulin-Secreting Cells/pathology , Insulin Resistance/genetics , Molecular Targeted Therapy/trends
3.
J Bone Oncol ; 29: 100375, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34131559

ABSTRACT

Optimum management of patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic has proved extremely challenging. Patients, clinicians and hospital authorities have had to balance the risks to patients of attending hospital, many of whom are especially vulnerable, with the risks of delaying or modifying cancer treatment. Those whose care has been significantly impacted include patients suffering from the effects of cancer on bone, where delivering the usual standard of care for bone support has often not been possible and clinicians have been forced to seek alternative options for adequate management. At a virtual meeting of the Cancer and Bone Society in July 2020, an expert group shared experiences and solutions to this challenge, following which a questionnaire was sent internationally to the symposium's participants, to explore the issues faced and solutions offered. 70 respondents, from 9 countries (majority USA, 39%, followed by UK, 19%) included 50 clinicians, spread across a diverse range of specialties (but with a high proportion, 64%, of medical oncologists) and 20 who classified themselves as non-clinical (solely lab-based). Spread of clinician specialty across tumour types was breast (65%), prostate (27%), followed by renal, myeloma and melanoma. Analysis showed that management of metastatic bone disease in all solid tumour types and myeloma, adjuvant bisphosphonate breast cancer therapy and cancer treatment induced bone loss, was substantially impacted. Respondents reported delays to routine CT scans (58%), standard bone scans (48%) and MRI scans (46%), though emergency scans were less affected. Delays in palliative radiotherapy for bone pain were reported by 31% of respondents with treatments often involving only a single dose without fractionation. Delays to, or cancellation of, prophylactic surgery for bone pain were reported by 35% of respondents. Access to treatments with intravenous bisphosphonates and subcutaneous denosumab was a major problem, mitigated by provision of drug administration at home or in a local clinic, reduced frequency of administration or switching to oral bisphosphonates taken at home. The questionnaire also revealed damaging delays or complete stopping of both clinical and laboratory research. In addition to an analysis of the questionnaire, this paper presents a rationale and recommendations for adaptation of the normal guidelines for protection of bone health during the pandemic.

4.
ESMO Open ; 6(3): 100153, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33984679

ABSTRACT

Most anticancer molecules are administered in body-size-based dosing schedules, bringing up unsolved issues regarding pharmacokinetic data in heavy patients. The worldwide spread of obesity has not been matched by improved methods and strategies for tailored drug dosage in this population. The weight or body surface area (BSA)-based approaches may fail to fully reflect the complexity of the anthropometric features besides obesity in cancer patients suffering from sarcopenia. Likewise, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic data on obese patients for the majority of chemotherapeutic agents as well as for new target drugs and immunotherapy. Therefore, although the available findings point to the role of dose intensity in cancer treatment, and support full weight-based dosing, empirical dose capping often occurs in clinical practice in order to avoid toxicity. Thus a panel of experts of the Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD), Società Italiana Endocrinologia (SIE), and Società Italiana Farmacologia (SIF), provides here a consensus statement for appropriate cytotoxic chemotherapy and new biological cancer drug dosing in obese patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Neoplasms , Physicians , Consensus , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Obesity/complications
5.
ESMO Open ; 6(3): 100155, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34020401

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a common cause of cancer-related death, due to difficulties in detecting early-stage disease, to its aggressive behaviour, and to poor response to systemic therapy. Therefore, developing strategies for early diagnosis of resectable PC is critical for improving survival. Diabetes mellitus is another major public health problem worldwide. Furthermore, diabetes can represent both a risk factor and a consequence of PC: nowadays, the relationship between these two diseases is considered a high priority for research. New-onset diabetes can be an early manifestation of PC, especially in a thin adult without a family history of diabetes. However, even if targeted screening for patients at higher risk of PC could be a promising approach, this is not recommended in asymptomatic adults with new-onset diabetes, due to the much higher incidence of hyperglycaemia than PC and to the lack of a safe and affordable PC screening test. Prompted by a well-established and productive multidisciplinary cooperation, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), the Italian Medical Diabetologists Association (AMD), the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), and the Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) here review available evidence on the mechanisms linking diabetes and PC, addressing the feasibility of screening for early PC in patients with diabetes, and sharing a set of update statements with the aim of providing a state-of-the-art overview and a decision aid tool for daily clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Physicians , Consensus , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Humans , Medical Oncology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology
6.
Bone ; 147: 115907, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33676057

ABSTRACT

The skeleton is the most common site of secondary disease in breast cancer and prostate cancer, with up to 80% of patients with advanced disease developing bone metastases (BM). The proportion is also substantial in advanced lung cancer (20%-40%). Because of the high prevalence of cancers of the breast, prostate and lung, these cancers account for more than 80% of cases of metastatic bone disease occurring in solid tumours. Metastatic bone disease is associated with greatly increased bone resorption by osteoclasts, leading to moderate to severe pain and other skeletal complications, with major impact on quality of life (QoL). Skeletal Related Events (SREs) have been defined as: pathological long bone or vertebral fractures; spinal cord compression; need for radiation for pain relief or to prevent fracture/spinal cord compression, need for surgery to bone and hypercalcaemia. More recently, Symptomatic Skeletal Events (SSEs) have been defined to monitor QoL. Although there are currently no curative treatments for metastatic bone disease, patients with breast or prostate cancer and BM are now surviving for several years and sometimes longer, and prevention of SREs is the key aim to optimization of QoL. Since their discovery 50 years ago and their introduction more than 30 years ago into the field of metastatic bone disease, a range of oral and intravenous bisphosphonate drugs have made a major contribution to prevention of SREs. Large trials have clearly demonstrated the clinical value of different bisphosphonate-based drugs (including the oral drugs ibandronate and clodronate and intravenous agents such as zoledronate and pamidronate), in treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy and the reduction of SREs and SSEs in a range of cancers. Despite the success of denosumab in reducing osteolysis, bisphosphonates also remain mainstay drugs for treatment of metastatic bone disease. Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the discovery of bisphosphonates, this review focuses on their continuing value in BM treatment and their future potential, for example in providing a bone-targeting vehicle for cytotoxic drugs.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Bone Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Zoledronic Acid
7.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(7): 845-854, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30470990

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune markers in the peripheral blood of melanoma patients provide useful information for clinical management although there is poor consensus on circulating cells which could putatively reflect the disease activity and play a prognostic role. Here, we investigated both dendritic cells (DCs) and T-regulatory cells (Tregs). METHODS: The number of DC subsets as myeloid (m) and plasmacytoid was measured by flowcytometry in 113 melanoma patients in different clinical stages and correlated with the disease activity to evaluate the recurrence free survival (RFS) calculated as difference between baseline and post-surgical values in relation to the criteria for the melanoma staging, as primary tumor removal, sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion of lymph node dissection. RESULTS: Circulating mDC levels were significantly lower in metastatic melanoma than in other stages and inversely correlated to Treg values while both populations were similarly expressed in inactive disease at stage I-III. Furthermore, the levels of these cells after melanoma removal were apparently related to the disease activity since their persistent defect reflected high risk of recurrence and reduced the RFS. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlighted the role of immune cell measurement for the management of melanoma activity and the identification of patients at potential risk of recurrence based on the mDC ratio.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Melanoma/immunology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/immunology , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Adult , Biomarkers, Tumor/immunology , Dendritic Cells/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/immunology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Rate , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/pathology , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
9.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 41(9): 798-808, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26410578

ABSTRACT

Osteopenia and osteoporosis are often long-term complications of anti-neoplastic treatments, defined as "cancer treatment-induced bone loss" (CTIBL). This pathological condition in oncologic patients results in a higher fracture risk than in the general population, and so has a significant negative impact on their quality of life. Hormone treatment is the main actor in this scenario, but not the only one. In fact, chemotherapies, radiotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors may contribute to deregulate bone remodeling via different mechanisms. Thus, the identification of cancer patients at risk for CTIBL is essential for early diagnosis and appropriate intervention, that includes both lifestyle modifications and pharmacological approaches to prevent bone metabolism failure during anti-tumor treatments.


Subject(s)
Bone Diseases, Metabolic/etiology , Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/therapy , Osteoporosis/etiology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/diagnosis , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/pathology , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/therapy , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Bone Remodeling/radiation effects , Humans , Neoplasms/metabolism , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/pathology , Osteoporosis/therapy , Radiotherapy/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...