Importance of the Interventricular Septum as Part of the Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize septal substrate in patients with nonischemic left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NILVCM) undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. BACKGROUND: The interventricular septum is an important site of VT substrate in NILVCM. METHODS: The authors studied 95 patients with NILVCM and VT. Electroanatomic mapping using standard bipolar (<1.5 mV) and unipolar (<8.3 mV) low-voltage criteria identified septal scar location and size. Analysis of unipolar voltage was performed and scars quantified using graded unipolar cutoffs from 4 to 8.3 mV were correlated with delayed gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR), performed in 57 patients. RESULTS: Detailed LV endocardial mapping (mean 262 ± 138 points) showed septal bipolar and unipolar voltage abnormalities (VAs) in 44 (46%) and 79 (83%) patients, most commonly with basal anteroseptal involvement. Of the 59 patients in whom the septum was targeted, bipolar and unipolar septal VAs were seen in 36 (61%) and 54 (92%). Of the 35 with CMR-defined septal scar, bipolar and unipolar septal VAs were seen in 18 (51%) and 31 (89%). In 12 patients without CMR septal scar, 6 (50%) had isolated unipolar septal VAs on electroanatomic mapping, a subset of whom the septum was targeted for ablation (44%). In the graded unipolar analysis, the optimal cutoff associated with magnetic resonance imaging septal scar was 4.8 mV (sensitivity 75%, specificity 70%; area under the curve: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.60 to 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Septal substrate by unipolar or bipolar voltage mapping in patients with NILVCM and VT is common. A unipolar voltage cutoff of 4.8 mV provides the best correlation with DE-CMR. A subset of patients with septal VT had normal DE-CMR or endocardial bipolar voltage with abnormal unipolar voltage.

Outcomes after asystole events occurring during wearable defibrillator-cardioverter use.

AIM: To examine whether wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) alarms for asystole improve patient outcomes and survival. METHODS: All asystole episodes recorded by the WCD in 2013 were retrospectively analyzed from a database of device and medical record documentation and customer call reports. Events were classified as asystole episodes if initial presenting arrhythmia was asystole (< 10 beats/minor ≥ 5 s pause). Survival was defined as recovery at the scene or arrival to a medical facility alive, or not requiring immediate medical attention. Episodes occurring in hospitals, nursing homes, or ambulances were considered to be under medical care. Serious asystole episodes were defined as resulting in unconsciousness, hospital transfer, or death. RESULTS: Of the total 51933 patients having worn the WCD in 2013, there were 257 patients (0.5%) who had asystole episodes and comprised the study cohort. Among the 257 patients (74% male, median age 69 years), there were 264 asystole episodes. Overall patient survival was 42%. Most asystoles were considered "serious" (n = 201 in 201 patients, 76%), with a 26% survival rate. All 56 patients with "non-serious" asystole episodes survived. Being under medical care was associated with worse survival of serious asystoles. Among acute survivors, 20% later died during WCD use (a median 4 days post asystole episode). Of the 86 living patients at the end of WCD use period, 48 (56%) received ICD/pacemaker and 17 (20%) improved their condition. CONCLUSION: Survival rates after asystole in patients with WCD are higher than historically reported survival rates. Those under medical care at time of asystole exhibited lower survival.

Wearable Cardioverter-defibrillators for the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Meta-analysis.

Wearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCDs) protect patients from sudden cardiac death (SCD) by detecting and treating life-threatening ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). Recently, two large studies evaluating WCDs were published. However, the results of older and newer studies have yet to be systematically summarized. The objective of the current study was to conduct a meta-analysis assessing the use and effectiveness of WCDs. We searched MEDLINE and Scopus (January 1998-July 2017) as well as the gray literature. We included registry/observational studies that (1) evaluated adult patients using WCDs; (2) provided data on one or more outcomes of interest; and (3) were full-text studies published in English. We calculated pooled incidence and/or rate [with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] estimates from nonoverlapping populations using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed via the I2 statistic. We identified 11 studies (19,882 patients) with nonoverlapping populations/endpoints; seven of them evaluated WCD use across various indications, while the remaining studies restricted their focus to a single indication. Most of the studies were retrospective (82%) and multicenter (64%) in nature, with 45% using manufacturers' registry data. The median duration of WCD use was three or more months in nine (82%) studies, and daily wear time ranged from a mean/median of 17 hours to 24 hours per day across included studies. Seven (64%) studies reported a mean/median daily wear time of more than 20 hours. This meta-analysis showed that the incidences of all-cause and SCD-related mortality among WCD patients were 1.4% (95% CI: 0.7%-2.4%) and 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.3%), respectively. VT/VF occurred in 2.6% (95% CI: 1.8%-3.5%) of patients. Across patients, 1.7% (95% CI: 1.4%-2.0%) received appropriate WCD treatment, corresponding to a rate of 9.1 patients/100 person-years (95% CI: 6.2-11.9 patients/100 person-years). Successful VT/VF termination following appropriate treatment occurred in 95.5% of patients (95% CI: 92.0%-98.0%) and the incidence of inappropriate treatment was infrequent (0.9%; 95% CI: 0.5%-1.4%). A moderate-to-high degree of statistical heterogeneity was observed in pooled analyses of mortality, VT/VF occurrence, and appropriate/inappropriate treatment (I2 ≥ 41% for all). In conclusion, WCDs appear to be successful in terms of terminating VT/VF in patients with an elevated risk of SCD and are appropriate for use while long-term risk management strategies are being identified.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic voltage discordance in non-ischemic left ventricle ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular depolarizations.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with late gadolinium enhancement is commonly performed in patients with non-ischemic LV ventricular tachycardia/ventricular premature depolarizations (non-ischemic LV-VT/VPDs) to define VT substrate prior to catheter ablation. We investigated the prevalence of abnormal voltage and VT localized to areas of the myocardium not reported to have late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on routine pre-procedural MRI and sought to determine if quantitative MRI analysis could reduce this discordance. METHODS: Patients with non-ischemic LV-VT/VPD who underwent LV endocardial mapping with VT/VPD ablation and either septal or free wall MRI-voltage discordance were studied. Electroanatomic maps were analyzed post-procedure for areas of electrogram-defined scar and VT localized to areas without reported LGE. Discordant segments were then analyzed offline using delayed signal intensity of >2 and >5 standard deviations above normal myocardium. RESULTS: Of 90 consecutive patients, 32 (36%) patients with septal (n = 16), free wall (n = 14) or both (n = 2) MRI-voltage + mismatch were identified. All discordant segments demonstrated unipolar voltage abnormalities with 12 patients (6 septal and 6 free wall) also showing low bipolar voltage but no LGE at signal intensity >5 standard deviations. Eleven patients (5 septum, 6 free wall) had VT localized to discordant areas. Ninety-three percent of patients in the septal group (26/48 segments) and 89% of patients in the free wall group (9/13 segments) had a concordant response established by using a signal intensity cutoff of >2 standard deviations. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-voltage discordance was identified in 36% of patients with non-ischemic LV-VT/VPD who underwent VT ablation. In 12% of patients, VT was targeted in areas of abnormal voltage not suggested by routine qualitative MRI. Quantitative MRI analysis using a lower signal intensity threshold increased the sensitivity for detecting areas of clinically relevant VT substrate.

Single-center outcomes of combined heart and liver transplantation in the failing Fontan.

Long-term outcomes of the Fontan operation include Fontan failure and liver disease. Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is an option for select patients although limited data exist on this strategy. A retrospective review of Fontan patients 18 years or older referred for cardiac transplant evaluation between 2000 and 2013 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania was performed. All patients were considered for potential CHLT. Clinical variables such as demographics, perioperative factors, and short-term outcomes were reviewed. Of 17 referrals for cardiac transplantation, seven Fontan patients underwent CHLT. All patients who underwent CHLT had either advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis on liver biopsy. There were no perioperative deaths. The most common postoperative morbidity was acute kidney injury. Short-term complications include one episode of acute liver rejection but no cardiac rejection greater than 1R. CHLT is an acceptable therapeutic option for patients with failing Fontan physiology who exhibit concomitant advanced liver fibrosis. However, optimal patient selection is currently undefined, and long-term outcomes are not known.

Outcomes in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Receiving the Subcutaneous Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator: Results From a Pooled Analysis From the IDE Study and the EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conceived to determine the safety and efficacy of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). BACKGROUND: The S-ICD is a treatment option for patients with CHD in which a transvenous device is contraindicated due to anatomic considerations. However, efficacy in this group has not been determined. METHODS: A pooled analysis of 865 patients in the EFFORTLESS (Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Clinical Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness) registry (an international observational database) and a U.S. Investigational Device Exemption study were reviewed. RESULTS: Nineteen CHD patients versus 846 non-CHD patients with a median follow-up of 567 days and 639 days, respectively, were included. There were no deaths and no appropriate shocks for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in the CHD cohort, versus 26 deaths (3.1%, p = 0.42) and 111 appropriate shocks in 59 patients (7.1%) in the non-CHD cohort (p = 0.23). There were similar complication rates for the CHD versus non-CHD groups (10.5 vs. 9.6% [p = 0.89]), with inappropriate shocks for T-wave oversensing as the only complication in the CHD group (n = 2). The rate of inappropriate shocks was similar for both groups (10.5% vs. 10.9% [p = 0.96]). Successful defibrillation testing at 80J was comparable for the CHD versus non-CHD groups (100% vs. 98.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall analysis of the CHD cohort from the pooled data of the Investigational Device Exemption study and the EFFORTLESS registry shows that the S-ICD is a safe option in CHD patients deemed to be at high risk for sudden cardiac death who do not have pacing indications. Further research to accurately define sudden cardiac death risk in the diverse anatomic substrates of CHD patients is warranted.