Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 21(10): 946-54, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26402393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a serious condition affecting more than 35% of adults in the United States. In obese individuals for whom other weight control methods have been ineffective, bariatric surgery is a safe and effective method of weight control. An estimated 150,000 to 160,000 bariatric surgeries are performed in the United States yearly. Iron deficiency anemia is common in patients after bariatric surgery, with incidence rates up to 49%, and may be due to malabsorption of nutrients.  OBJECTIVES: To (a) compare the medical resource utilization (MRU)- both medical care and treatment resources-and associated costs in a sample of commercially insured adult bariatric surgery patients with and without iron deficiency anemia (IDA), and (b) describe anti-anemia treatment patterns in those bariatric surgery patients diagnosed with IDA. METHODS: Using Truven Health MarketScan claims data, bariatric surgery patients were identified by the ICD-9-CM and CPT procedure codes for bariatric surgery and classified by surgery and IDA diagnosis within 2 years of initial surgery. Intravenous (IV) iron treatment was determined by HCPCS codes, prescription oral iron by NDC numbers, and blood transfusions by CPT and ICD-9-CM codes. Clinical, MRU, and economic outcomes for all-cause health services were compared between IDA and non-IDA patients. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics on outcomes of complications and hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 24,344 bariatric surgery patients analyzed, 11.6% received an IDA diagnosis 2 years after surgery (average days to diagnosis = 279). Most IDA patients (78.5%) received a test for iron in the post-index period; only 9.1% received IV iron treatment, with iron dextran (3.8%) and iron sucrose (3.4%) being the most common (average days to IV iron treatment = 403 days). Prescription oral iron was found in 4.9% of all IDA patients (average days to oral iron treatment = 476.7). Approximately 9% of IDA patients received a blood transfusion (average days to transfusion = 304.8). For the total sample, the average age was 46 years with a higher percentage of females (83.9% IDA; 78.7% non-IDA). Most clinical characteristics were similar among patients with and without IDA, except heart disease (1.3% IDA vs. 0.8% non-IDA; P = 0.005) and gallbladder disease (0.0% IDA vs. 0.2% non-IDA; P = 0.037). More IDA patients had complications after surgery (40.4% vs. 27.7%; P less than 0.001), such as nonabsorption (22.4% vs. 16.5%; P less than 0.001); digestive (15.6% vs. 10.2%; P less than 0.001); and gastrojejunal ulcer (7.6% vs. 2.0%; P less than 0.001). Multivariate results showed that IDA patients were more likely to have a bariatric surgery complication over non-IDA patients (OR = 1.367, 95% CI = 1.257-1.487; P less than 0.05). Adjusted results showed IDA patients more than twice as likely to be hospitalized (OR = 2.567, 95% CI = 2.363-2.790; P less than 0.05). Total costs were twice as much in the IDA group compared with the non-IDA group ($37,882 vs. $19,253; P less than 0.001).  CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery patients who develop IDA may be subject to higher complication rates, MRU, and direct medical costs. Although most bariatric surgery patients who develop IDA are tested for iron, most are not treated with IV iron or oral iron and do not receive blood transfusions. Further research is needed to determine if IDA is a result of bariatric surgery complications or a predictor of increased MRU and costs.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/epidemiology , Bariatric Surgery , Cost of Illness , Obesity/surgery , Adult , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/economics , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/etiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Iron Compounds/therapeutic use , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
2.
J Manag Care Pharm ; 16(8): 605-15, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20866165

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, decreased quality of life, and substantial health care costs. Iron therapy is recommended, usually in combination with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), in many CKD patients with anemia and low iron levels to raise hemoglobin levels to a range of 10 to 12 grams per deciliter; iron deficiency is defined by a ferritin score less than 100 micrograms (mcg) per liter and transferrin saturation (TSAT) less than 20%. OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of intravenous (IV) iron and its associated economic and clinical outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries with stage 3 or stage 4 CKD and anemia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis using 2006 and 2007 Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files (SAF). Use of therapy with IV iron and/or ESAs was identified among patients diagnosed with CKD and anemia. The study index quarter was the first quarter in 2006 during which the patient had primary or secondary diagnoses of both CKD and anemia. Based on the receipt of IV iron or ESA treatment in the index quarter, patients were classified into 1 of 4 treatment groups: IV iron and ESA; IV iron without ESA; ESA without IV iron; neither IV iron nor ESA. Therapy with oral iron was not measurable with this database. Clinical and economic outcomes, including the progression to advanced CKD stages, development of anemia, mortality, hospitalization, and net Medicare reimbursement (i.e., not including patient or supplemental plan contribution) for all-cause health care services, were examined for 1 year following the index quarter. Between-group differences were tested using Pearson chi-square for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test for reimbursement. Multivariate logistic regression models were estimated to assess the associations of mortality, inpatient hospitalization, skilled nursing facility (SNF) admission, and hospice care with treatment regimen, controlling for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 4,310 study patients with both CKD and anemia, 2,913 (67.6%) received neither IV iron nor ESA; 984 (22.8%) received ESA without IV iron; 277 (6.4%) received IV iron and ESA; and 136 (3.2%) received IV iron without ESA in the index quarter. Logistic regression analyses showed that patients receiving neither IV iron nor ESA (reference group) were at increased risk of death compared with patients receiving both IV iron and ESA (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.42-0.90). Additionally, patients receiving neither IV iron nor ESA were more likely to be hospitalized compared with patients receiving both IV iron and ESA (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.50-0.87), IV iron without ESA (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38-0.79), and ESA without IV iron (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.62-0.87). Further, patients not receiving IV iron or ESA were more likely to be admitted to an SNF than patients receiving both IV iron and ESA (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.32-0.61), IV iron without ESA (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.36-0.88), and ESA without IV iron (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.47-0.67). Patients receiving neither IV iron nor ESA in the index quarter had the highest mean [SD] total Medicare reimbursement per patient in the subsequent year ($42,353 [$52,887]) compared with patients receiving IV iron without ESA ($28,654 [$32,068]), IV iron and ESA ($34,152 [$30,506]), or ESA without IV iron ($38,172 [$35,591], P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use rates of IV iron and ESA in a sample of Medicare enrollees with CKD and anemia in 2006 suggest that anemia management therapies may be underutilized; however, oral iron therapy use was not measurable with the study database, and therapies initiated after the index quarter were not measured. Patients not treated with IV iron or ESA had significantly higher rates of hospitalization and SNF admission than patients treated with either IV iron or ESA. Further, mortality was significantly higher in patients receiving neither IV iron nor ESA than in patients who received IV iron and ESA. Additionally, total all-cause health care costs were higher among patients receiving neither IV iron nor ESA treatment compared with patients treated with IV iron and/or ESA.


Subject(s)
Anemia/economics , Anemia/therapy , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Iron Compounds/therapeutic use , Kidney Failure, Chronic/economics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Medicare/economics , Adult , Aged , Anemia/complications , Endpoint Determination , Female , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Iron Compounds/administration & dosage , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...