Impact of systemic hypoxia and blood flow restriction on mechanical, cardiorespiratory, and neuromuscular responses to a multiple-set repeated sprint exercise.

Introduction: Repeated sprint cycling exercises (RSE) performed under systemic normobaric hypoxia (HYP) or with blood flow restriction (BFR) are of growing interest. To the best of our knowledge, there is no stringent consensus on the cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular responses between systemic HYP and BFR during RSE. Thus, this study assessed cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular responses to multiple sets of RSE under HYP or with BFR. Methods: According to a crossover design, fifteen men completed RSE (three sets of five 10-s sprints with 20 s of recovery) in normoxia (NOR), HYP, and with bilaterally-cuffed BFR at 45% of resting arterial occlusive pressure during sets in NOR. Power output, cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular responses were assessed. Results: Average peak and mean powers were lower in BFR (dz = 0.87 and dz = 1.23, respectively) and HYP (dz = 0.65 and dz = 1.21, respectively) compared to NOR (p < 0.001). The percentage decrement of power output was greater in BFR (dz = 0.94) and HYP (dz = 0.64) compared to NOR (p < 0.001), as well as in BFR compared to NOR (p = 0.037, dz = 0.30). The percentage decrease of maximal voluntary contraction of the knee extensors after the session was greater in BFR compared to NOR and HYP (p = 0.011, dz = 0.78 and p = 0.027, dz = 0.75, respectively). Accumulated ventilation during exercise was higher in HYP and lower in BFR (p = 0.002, dz = 0.51, and p < 0.001, dz = 0.71, respectively). Peak oxygen consumption was reduced in HYP (p < 0.001, dz = 1.47). Heart rate was lower in BFR during exercise and recovery (p < 0.001, dz = 0.82 and p = 0.012, dz = 0.43, respectively). Finally, aerobic contribution was reduced in HYP compared to NOR (p = 0.002, dz = 0.46) and BFR (p = 0.005, dz = 0.33). Discussion: Thus, this study indicates that power output during RSE is impaired in HYP and BFR and that BFR amplifies neuromuscular fatigue. In contrast, HYP did not impair neuromuscular function but enhanced the ventilatory response along with reduced oxygen consumption.

Active recovery vs hot- or cold-water immersion for repeated sprint ability after a strenuous exercise training session in elite skaters.

This study compared the acute effects of three recovery methods: active recovery (AR), hot- and cold-water immersion (HWI and CWI, respectively), used between two training sessions in elite athletes. Twelve national-team skaters (7 males, 5 females) completed three trials according to a randomized cross-over study. Fifteen minutes after an exhaustive ice-skating training session, participants underwent 20 min of HWI (41.1 ± 0.5°C), 15 min of CWI (12.1 ± 0.7°C) or 15 min of active recovery (AR). After 1 h 30 min of the first exercise, they performed a repeated-sprint cycling session. Average power output was slightly but significantly higher for AR (767 ± 179 W) and HWI (766 ± 170 W) compared to CWI (738 ± 156 W) (p = 0.026, d = 0.18). No statistical difference was observed between the conditions for both lactatemia and rating of perceived exertion. Furthermore, no significant effect of recovery was observed on the fatigue index calculated from the repeated sprint cycling exercises (p > 0.05). Finally, a positive correlation was found between the average muscle temperature measured during the recoveries and the maximal power output obtained during cycling exercises. In conclusion, the use of CWI in between high-intensity training sessions could slightly impair the performance outcomes compared to AR and HWI. However, studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these results, especially in less trained athletes.

Muscle Deoxygenation Rates and Reoxygenation Modeling During a Sprint Interval Training Exercise Performed Under Different Hypoxic Conditions.

This study compared the kinetics of muscle deoxygenation and reoxygenation during a sprint interval protocol performed under four modalities: blood flow restriction at 60% of the resting femoral artery occlusive pressure (BFR), gravity-induced BFR (G-BFR), simulated hypoxia (FiO2≈13%, HYP) and normoxia (NOR). Thirteen healthy men performed each session composed of five all-out 30-s efforts interspaced with 4 min of passive recovery. Total work during the exercises was 17 ± 3.4, 15.8 ± 2.9, 16.7 ± 3.4, and 18.0 ± 3.0 kJ for BFR, G-BFR, HYP and NOR, respectively. Muscle oxygenation was continuously measured with near-infrared spectroscopy. Tissue saturation index (TSI) was modelled with a linear function at the beginning of the sprint and reoxygenation during recovery with an exponential function. Results showed that both models were adjusted to the TSI (R2 = 0.98 and 0.95, respectively). Greater deoxygenation rates were observed in NOR compared to BFR (p = 0.028). No difference was found between the conditions for the deoxygenation rates relative to sprint total work (p > 0.05). Concerning reoxygenation, the amplitude of the exponential was not different among conditions (p > 0.05). The time delay of reoxygenation was longer in BFR compared to the other conditions (p < 0.05). A longer time constant was found for G-BFR compared to the other conditions (p < 0.05), and mean response time was longer for BFR and G-BFR. Finally, sprint performance was correlated with faster reoxygenation. Hence, deoxygenation rates were not different between the conditions when expressed relatively to total sprint work. Furthermore, BFR conditions impair reoxygenation: BFR delays and G-BFR slows down reoxygenation.