High dose rate endoluminal brachytherapy in the treatment of endobronchial lesions - experience of a single institution and literature review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Iridium-192 high-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) for palliation of symptoms and for curative intent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a prospectively registered cohort of 31 patients with endobronchial lesions treated with HDR-EBT at our institution between 2008 and 2020. Eighteen patients were treated with palliative intent and 13 curative intent; 4 of them as a boost to external radiation therapy (XRT). The primary objectives of the study were to analyze the symptomatic relief, endoscopic response, and treatment-related toxicity. As a secondary endpoint, survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: In palliative setting, most of the symptomatic patients (80%) presented a significant clinical improvement and 75% presented endoscopic improvement of the lesions. In curative setting, all patients with visible lesions had endoscopic improvement and better survival than palliatively treated patients (median: 78 and 9 months, respectively; p = 0.002). There were no complications in 91.4% of the treatments: only one pneumonia, one pneumothorax and one bronchial stenosis occurred, all in palliative treatments. No fatal hemoptysis happened. Acute toxicity was mild (G ≤ 2) and transitory. DISCUSSION: HDR-EBT is an excellent, safe, and inexpensive palliative treatment of symptoms caused by endobronchial growth of tumors in the proximal airway, either as a single treatment or in combination with XRT. It can also be an alternative in the treatment of initial malignant tumors when surgery or XRT is not possible, and it may also play a role in treating non-malignant bronchial obstructions.

High-dose neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone followed by surgery in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. A multi-institutional retrospective study by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society).

BACKGROUND: The optimal induction treatment in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC remains undefined. AIM: To compare neoadjuvant high-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) in patients with resectable, stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre study of 99 patients diagnosed with stage cT1-T3N2M0 NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (high-dose CRT or CHT) followed by surgery between January 2005 and December 2014. RESULTS: 47 patients (47.5%) underwent CRT and 52 (52.5%) CHT, with a median follow-up of 41 months. Surgery consisted of lobectomy (87.2% and 82.7%, in the CRT and CHT groups, respectively) or pneumonectomy (12.8% vs. 17.3%). Nodal downstaging (to N1/N0) and Pathologic complete response (pCR; pT0pN0) rates were significantly higher in the CRT group (89.4% vs. 57.7% and 46.8% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p < 0.001)). Locoregional recurrence was significantly lower in the CRT group (8.5% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.047) but distant recurrence rates were similar in the two groups. Median PFS was 45 months (CHT) vs. "not reached" (CRT). Median OS was similar: 61 vs. 56 months (p = 0.803). No differences in grade ≥3 toxicity were observed. On the Cox regression analysis, advanced pT stage was associated with worse OS and PFS (p < 0.001) and persistent N2 disease (p = 0.002) was associated with worse PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, a higher proportion of patients treated with preoperative CRT achieved nodal downstaging and pCR with better locoregional control. However, there were no differences in survival. More studies are needed to know the optimal treatment of these patients.