Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
3.
Educ. méd. (Ed. impr.) ; 3(1): 3-8, ene. 2000.
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-17900

ABSTRACT

El nivel de compresión de los estudiantes los diferencia entre sí a través de los enfoques de aprendizaje. Un enfoque superficial conlleva un concepto simplificado del aprendizaje, entendido como memorización. Un enfoque profundo revela una concepción compleja del aprendizaje, con la intención de alcanzar una comprensión personal del material presentado. Los autores proponen el enfoque profundo como principal característica de la educación superior y, por tanto, del modelo psicopedagógico de la formación en enfermería. Tres elementos -el método docente, las prácticas clínicas y los procedimientos de evaluación- deben ser objeto de modificación para mejorar el aprendizaje. Se analizan las clases magistrales de calidad, la práctica reflexiva basada en la solución de problemas y algunos instrumentos de evaluación (AU)


Subject(s)
Nurses/standards , Nurses/legislation & jurisprudence , Education, Nursing, Graduate/classification , Education, Nursing, Graduate/methods , Education, Nursing, Graduate , Education, Nursing/methods , Education, Nursing/standards , Faculty, Nursing/standards , Faculty, Nursing/organization & administration , Faculty, Nursing/supply & distribution , Models, Nursing , Models, Educational , Education, Nursing, Graduate/statistics & numerical data , Education, Nursing, Graduate/organization & administration , Teaching/methods , Teaching/organization & administration , Teaching/standards
4.
Rev Enferm ; 20(227-8): 23-31, 1997.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9282076

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were: A) to assemble a Standard Care Plan Guide taken from both nursing care records as well as data from a bibliography review; B) to know the number of nursing interventions and evaluate their suitability according to the stated nursing diagnosis. These results can then be compared before and after using the Standard Care Plan Guide. An analysis of 1827 nursing care records was performed. The first phase, after studying 1255 records, consisted of standardizing the care to correspond with 36 nursing diagnoses previously selected from the NANDA taxonomy. The second phase saw the standard care practice incorporated by the nursing staff. And finally, a comparison was made of the results between phase one and three (before and after the incorporation of the Standard Care Plan Guide.) The number of nursing interventions notably increased, jumping from 3263 in the first phase up to 4271 in the third. The average nursing action per patient rose from 3.03 to 9.09. Also, the diagnostic categories increased, going from 930 in the first phase up to 1624 in the third. The average number of correctly stated diagnoses per patient climbed from 1.56 to 2.78. The authors state that better nursing care and attention to the patient can occur if the nurses are given the conceptual instruments and training that will facilitate their daily tasks.


Subject(s)
Nursing Diagnosis/standards , Patient Care Planning/standards , Quality of Health Care , Clinical Nursing Research , Humans , Nursing Audit , Nursing Records , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...