ABSTRACT
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the single largest contributor to climate change due to its increased emissions since global industrialization began. Carbon Capture, Storage, and Utilization (CCSU) is regarded as a promising strategy to mitigate climate change, reducing the atmospheric concentration of CO2 from power and industrial activities. Post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) is necessary to implement CCSU into existing facilities without changing the combustion block. In this study, the recent research on various PCC technologies is discussed, along with the membrane technology for PCC, emphasizing the different types of membranes and their gas separation performances. Additionally, an overall comparison of membrane separation technology with respect to other PCC methods is implemented based on six different key parameters-CO2 purity and recovery, technological maturity, scalability, environmental concerns, and capital and operational expenditures. In general, membrane separation is found to be the most competitive technique in conventional absorption as long as the highly-performed membrane materials and the technology itself reach the full commercialization stage. Recent updates on the main characteristics of different flue gas streams and the Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) of each PCC technology are also provided with a brief discussion of their latest progresses.
ABSTRACT
Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage technologies are essential mitigation options to reach net-zero CO2 emissions. However, this challenge requires the development of sustainable and economic separation technologies. This work presents a novel CO2 capture technology strategy based on non-dispersive CO2 absorption and membrane vacuum regeneration (MVR) technology, and employs two imidazolium ionic liquids (ILs), [emim][Ac] and [emim][MS], with different behavior to absorb CO2. Continuous absorption-desorption experiments were carried out using polypropylene hollow fiber membrane contactors. The results show the highest desorption behavior in the case of [emim][Ac], with a MVR performance efficiency of 92% at 313 K and vacuum pressure of 0.04 bar. On the other hand, the IL [emim][MS] reached an efficiency of 83% under the same conditions. The MVR technology could increase the overall CO2 capture performance by up to 61% for [emim][Ac] and 21% for [emim][MS], which represents an increase of 26% and 9%, respectively. Moreover, adding 30%vol. demonstrates that the process was only favorable by using the physical IL. The results presented here indicate the interest in membrane vacuum regeneration technology based on chemical ILs, but further techno-economic evaluation is needed to ensure the competitiveness of this novel CO2 desorption approach for large-scale application.
ABSTRACT
Climate change has become one of the most important challenges in the 21st century, and the electroreduction of CO2 to value-added products has gained increasing importance in recent years. In this context, formic acid or formate are interesting products because they could be used as raw materials in several industries as well as promising fuels in fuel cells. Despite the great number of studies published in the field of the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formic acid/formate working with electrocatalysts of different nature and electrode configurations, few of them are focused on the comparison of different electrocatalyst materials and electrode configurations. Therefore, this work aims at presenting a rigorous and comprehensive comparative assessment of different experimental data previously published after many years of research in different working electrode configurations and electrocatalysts in a continuous mode with a single pass of the inputs through the reactor. Thus, the behavior of the CO2 electroreduction to formate is compared operating with Sn and Bi-based materials under Gas Diffusion Electrodes (GDEs) and Catalyst Coated Membrane Electrodes (CCMEs) configurations. Considering the same electrocatalyst, the use of CCMEs improves the performance in terms of formate concentration and energy consumption. Nevertheless, higher formate rates can be achieved with GDEs because they allow operation at higher current densities of up to 300 mA·cm-2. Bi-based-GDEs outperformed Sn-GDEs in all the figures of merit considered. The comparison also highlights that in CCME configuration, the employ of Bi-based-electrodes enhanced the behavior of the process, increasing the formate concentration by 35% and the Faradaic efficiency by 11%.
