Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 181(3): 667-678, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32356254

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to analyse the relative survival with breast cancer in women diagnosed after new treatments were generalised and to ascertain the current effect that tumour characteristics such as grade, stage or subtype have on survival as well as the new AJCC-pathological prognostic score. METHODS: The breast cancer MCC-Spain follow-up study is a prospective cohort study of 1685 incident breast cancer cases. Women between 20 and 85 years old were recruited between the years 2008 and 2013 in 18 hospitals located in 10 Spanish provinces and they have been followed until 2017/2018. Relative survival was estimated after 3, 5 and 8 years of follow-up using Ederer II method. In addition, Weibull regression adjusted by age, hospital, grade and stage was used to investigate prognosis factors. RESULTS: Among components of TNM staging system, tumour size greater than 50 mm (i.e. T3 or T4) more than doubled the risk of dying, while N3 nodal involvement and presence of metastasis had a huge effect on mortality. The AJCC pathological prognostic score strongly correlated with survival; thus, hazard ratios increased as the score rose, being 2.31, 4.00, 4.94, 7.92, 2.26, 14.9 and 58.9 for scores IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC and IV, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both TNM staging and histological/molecular biomarkers are associated with overall survival in Spanish women with breast cancer; when both are combined in the AJCC pathological prognosis score, the prognostic value improved with risk indices that increased rapidly as the pathological prognosis score increased.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Carcinoma, Lobular/mortality , Survivorship , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Case-Control Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Spain , Survival Rate , Young Adult
3.
Eur J Nutr ; 59(3): 1171-1179, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31069457

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between dietary fat and fat subtype and breast cancer development. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study with 1181 cases of incident breast cancer, diagnosed between 2007 and 2012, and 1682 population controls frequency matched (by age, sex, and region) from the Spanish multicenter case-control study MCC-Spain. RESULTS: We found a significant protective effect in premenopausal women of total fat intake [OR 0.51 95% CI (0.31-0.86) highest versus lowest tertile], but no effect was observed in menopausal women [OR 1.15 95% CI (0.83-1.60)]. Analyzing by type of fat, this protective effect persisted only for the monounsaturated fatty acids [OR 0.51 95% CI (0.32-0.82)]. In contrast, other fatty acids did not have a significant effect. In addition, a protection against risk of breast cancer was found when polyunsaturated fats were "substituted" by monounsaturated, maintaining the same total fat intake [OR 0.68 95% CI (0.47-0.99)]. Finally, analyzing by breast cancer subtype, we found no effect, except in premenopausal women where intake of moderate [OR 0.52 95% CI (0.33-0.82)] and high monounsaturated fatty acids [OR 0.47 95% CI (0.27-0.82)] maintains a protective effect against ER/PR + tumors. In contrast, in menopausal women, a high intake of monounsaturated fatty acids was associated with higher risk of HER2 + tumors [OR 2.00 95% CI (0.97-4.13)]. CONCLUSION: Our study shows a differential effect of monounsaturated fatty acids according to menopausal status and breast cancer subtype.


Subject(s)
Dietary Fats/pharmacology , Fatty Acids/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Fatty Acids/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Spain/epidemiology
4.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 28(4): 294-303, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30489354

ABSTRACT

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) chronic infection causes severe digestive diseases, including gastric cancer, and certain strains entail a higher risk. Risk factors for this infection are still not fully understood. The aim of this study was to describe the association of adult and childhood sociodemographic factors with the seroprevalence of H. pylori, and with CagA and VacA antigen-specific seropositivity among H. pylori-seropositive individuals in the Spanish adult population. Serum antibody reactivity to H. pylori proteins was evaluated using multiplex serology in 2555 population-based controls enrolled in the MCC-Spain study, a multicase-control study recruiting participants from 2008 to 2013 in different areas of Spain. H. pylori seroprevalence was defined as seropositivity against at least four bacterial proteins. Information on sociodemographics, lifestyles, and environmental exposures was collected through personal interviews. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Poisson regression models to assess the association of lifetime sociodemographic factors with H. pylori seroprevalence and with seropositivity for CagA and VacA. H. pylori seroprevalence was 87.2%. Seropositivity was statistically significantly higher in men, increased with age, BMI, and number of siblings, and decreased with education and socioeconomic family level at birth. Among H. pylori-seropositive individuals, seropositivity was 53.3% for CagA, 61.4% for VacA, and 38.8% for both CagA and VacA. Ever smokers had lower seroprevalence for CagA and VacA than never smokers. H. pylori seroprevalence among this Spanish adult population was high and one third of the population was seropositive for two well-known markers of gastric cancer risk: CagA and VacA. Sex, age, education, and BMI were associated with H. pylori seroprevalence.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Socioeconomic Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/prevention & control , Age Factors , Aged , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Helicobacter Infections/blood , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Helicobacter pylori/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Sex Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/microbiology , Time Factors
5.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol ; 182: 4-13, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29679754

ABSTRACT

Epidemiologic evidence on the association between vitamin D and breast cancer is still inconclusive. This study analyzes the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and breast cancer risk by pathologic subtype, stage at diagnosis and specific breast cancer risk factors. We conducted a population-based multicase-control study where 546 histologically-confirmed breast cancer cases and 558 population controls, frequently matched by geographic area, age and body mass index, were recruited in 12 Spanish provinces (MCC-Spain). Information was collected by a questionnaire and plasma 25(OH)D was measured by solid-phase extraction on-line coupled to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-LC-MS/MS). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using logistic and multinomial mixed regression models. We found a clear protective effect between 25(OH)D levels and breast cancer risk, with a significant dose-response trend (OR per 10 nmol/L = 0.88; 95%CI = 0.82-0.94). While no differences were observed between pre and postmenopausal women, stage at diagnosis, or across strata of the main breast cancer risk factors, the protection was more pronounced for triple negative tumors (OR per 10 nmol/L = 0.64; p-heterogeneity = 0.038). Similar results were observed when only cases sampled in the first month after diagnosis were considered. The protective effect of vitamin D on breast cancer risk may be subtype specific, being stronger for more aggressive tumors, which provides a new approach to prevent this disease.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/blood , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Population Surveillance , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/classification , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Vitamin D/blood , Young Adult
6.
BMC Cancer ; 16(1): 660, 2016 08 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27542890

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) consumption and breast cancer has been repeatedly studied, although the results remain controversial. Most case-control studies reported that NSAID consumption protected against breast cancer, while most cohort studies did not find this effect. Most studies have dealt with NSAIDs as a whole group or with specific drugs, such aspirin, ibuprofen, or others, but not with NSAID subgroups according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System; moreover, scarce attention has been paid to their effect on different tumor categories (i.e.: ductal/non-ductal, stage at diagnosis or presence of hormonal receptors). METHODS: In this case-control study, we report the NSAID - breast cancer relationship in 1736 breast cancer cases and 1895 healthy controls; results are reported stratifying by the women's characteristics (i.e.: menopausal status or body mass index category) and by tumor characteristics. RESULTS: In our study, NSAID use was associated with a 24 % reduction in breast cancer risk (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.76; 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.64-0.89), and similar results were found for acetic acid derivatives, propionic acid derivatives and COXIBs, but not for aspirin. Similar results were found in postmenopausal and premenopausal women. NSAID consumption also protected against hormone + or HER2+ cancers, but not against triple negative breast cancers. The COX-2 selectivity showed an inverse association with breast cancer (i.e. OR < 1), except in advanced clinical stage and triple negative cancers. CONCLUSION: Most NSAIDs, but not aspirin, showed an inverse association against breast cancer; this effect seems to be restricted to hormone + or HER2+ cancers.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Body Mass Index , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Postmenopause , Premenopause , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...