Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Public Health ; 182: 170-172, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32334183

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: With the current SARS-CoV2 outbreak, countless tests need to be performed on potential symptomatic individuals, contacts and travellers. The gold standard is a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based system taking several hours to confirm positivity. For effective public health containment measures, this time span is too long. We therefore evaluated a rapid test in a high-prevalence community setting. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-nine randomly selected individuals at a COVID-19 screening centre were simultaneously tested via qPCR and a rapid test. Ten previously diagnosed individuals with known SARS-CoV-2 infection were also analysed. METHODS: The evaluated rapid test is an IgG/IgM-based test for SARS-CoV-2 with a time to result of 20 min. Two drops of blood are needed for the test performance. RESULTS: Of 49 individuals, 22 tested positive by repeated qPCR. In contrast, the rapid test detected only eight of those positive correctly (sensitivity: 36.4%). Of the 27 qPCR-negative individuals, 24 were detected correctly (specificity: 88.9%). CONCLUSION: Given the low sensitivity, we recommend not to rely on an antibody-based rapid test for public health measures such as community screenings.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Community Health Services , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Disease Outbreaks , Mass Screening/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Point-of-Care Testing , Adult , Aged , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
3.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 224: 113449, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31978723

ABSTRACT

Between August 2018 and June 2019, a river system in Germany that supplies a drinking water reservoir and is subject to the discharge from two sewage treatment plants was monitored for antibiotic residues via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, antibiotic resistance genes (including blaNDM, blaVIM, blaOXA-48, blaKPC, blaGIM, blaSME, blaIMI, blaIMP, blaSPM, blaSIM, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, blaOXA-51, blaOXA-58, mcr) via qualitative real-time PCR and antibiotic-resistant bacteria [belonging to the ESKAPE-group (Enterococcus faecium, Staphyhlococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter ssp.; with resistance against Carbapenemases, Cephalosporines and Colistin) and Escherichia coli] based on cultivation methods followed by a characterization via MALDI-TOF MS and susceptibility testing applying microdilution. Residues of macrolide antibiotics such as clarithromycin (up to 0.60 µg/L) and residues of sulfamethoxazole (up to 0.40 µg/L) and trimethoprim (up to 0.39 µg/L) were detected downstream of the sewage treatment plants. In addition, no antibiotic residues were detected upstream the respective sewage treatment plants, except for anhydroerythromycin (n = 1,

Subject(s)
Drinking Water/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Water Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Monitoring , Germany , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Water Pollution/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...