Serum thiol levels and thiol/disulphide homeostasis in gunshot injuries.

BACKGROUND: Gunshot injuries result in serious traumatic tissue damage due to high velocity of the bullet, deep penetration, and ballistic effect. Trauma is known to be related with oxidative stress. Serum thiol levels and disulphide/thiol homeostasis are novel oxidative stress biomarkers. In this study, we aimed to investigate serum thiol levels and disulphide/thiol homeostasis in injury patterns of patients admitted to the emergency department with a gunshot injury. METHOD: A total of 128 participants were included in the study. The participants were divided into two groups: the patient group (Group 1; n = 73) and healthy controls (Group 2; n = 55). Native thiol, total thiol, disulphide levels, disulphide/native thiol, disulphide/total thiol, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were measured. The Revised Trauma Scale (RTS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores were calculated. RESULTS: Native thiol, total thiol, and disulphide levels were significantly lower in Group 1 (p < 0.001). Disulphide/native thiol ratio, disulphide/total thiol ratio, and NLR were significantly higher in Group 1, compared to Group 2 (p < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between thiol levels and RTS and GCS scores and NLR. Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that native thiol was an independent indicator of RTS and GCS scores. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed that serum native thiol levels of ≤ 342.9 could predict gunshot injury with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 77% (area under the curve = 0.853; 95% confidence interval 0.783-0.924). CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that thiol-disulphide homeostasis is disrupted in patients sustaining gunshot injuries, and thiol levels decrease in correlation with the severity of trauma with a high sensitivity and specificity. As the level of native thiol is an independent predictor of the severity of trauma, reduced thiol levels may be of prognostic value in the early assessment of patients in the emergency room.

Compare the effects of intravenous and intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on ultrafiltration failure in a rat model of chronic peritoneal dialysis.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the possible healing effects of intraperitoneal (IP) and intravenous (IV) mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation on ultrafiltration failure (UFF) in a chronic rat model of peritoneal dialysis (PD). METHODS: Rats were initially divided into two groups. The UFF-group received once-daily IP injections of 20 mL of 3.86% glucose PD solution for six weeks to stimulate the development of UFF, and a control group received no injections. The UFF group was sub-divided into four groups: an UFF-C group, a MSC-IP group, a MSC-IV group and a placebo (P) group. Peritoneal equilibration tests (PETs) and peritoneal biopsies were performed in the control and UFF-C groups. MSCs were administered by IP injection in the MSC-IP group and by IV injection in the MSC-IV group. The P group received IP injection of placebo. PETs and peritoneal biopsies were performed in the MSC-IP, MSC-IV and P groups at the three weeks after receiving MSCs or placebo. RESULTS: When compared with the control group, ultrafiltration capacity significantly decreased, and the submesothelial thickness increased in the UFF-C and P group, but there were no differences between the control and MSC-IP and MSC-IV groups. The rate of glucose transport was high in the UFF-C and P group compared with the control group, and D/PCr rates in the UFF-C and P group were lower than in the control group. However, D/D0glucose was higher and D/PCr was lower in the MSC-IP group than in the UFF-C and P groups, but D/D0glucose rate of MSC-IV group similar to UFF-C and P groups and there was no difference between MSC-IV group and the other groups in terms of D/PCr rates. The MSC-IP, MSC-IV and P groups had significantly decreased tumor necrosis factor α concentrations compared with the UFF-C group. MSC-IP group had lower levels of TGF-ß1 compared with the P group; MSC-IP group had also lower levels of interleukin-6 compared with UFF-C group. CONCLUSION: The UFF group had a high permeability UFF. These results showed that IV and IP MSC transplantation exerted positive effects on UFF in a chronic rat model of PD. However, healing effect of small solute transport in MSC-IP group was better than MSC-IV group. IP MSC transplantation may be more effective than IV MSC transplantation for the renewal of the peritoneum in chronic PD patients with UFF.

Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation may provide a new therapy for ultrafiltration failure in chronic peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate possible healing effects of intraperitoneal (IP) mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation on ultrafiltration failure (UFF) in a chronic rat model of peritoneal dialysis (PD). METHODS: Rats were initially divided into two groups. The APUF group received once-daily IP injections of 20 mL of 3.86% glucose PD solution for 6 weeks to stimulate the development of UFF and a control group received noinjections. The PUF group was sub-divided into three groups: a PUF-C group, an MSC group and a Placebo (P) group. Peritoneal equilibration tests (PETs) and peritoneal biopsies were performed in the control and PUF-C groups. MSCs were administered by IP injection in the MSC group and the PUF-C and P groups received IP injection of placebo. PETs and peritoneal biopsies were performed in the MSC and P groups at the first [P-1 (and MSC-1 groups] and second [P-2 and MSC-2 groups] week after receiving MSCs or placebo. RESULTS: When compared with the control group, ultrafiltration capacity significantly decreased and the submesothelial thickness increased in the PUF-C and P groups (P-1, P-2) (P < 0.05), but there were no differences between the control and MSC groups (MSC-1, MSC-2). The rate of glucose transport was high in the PUF-C and P-2 groups compared with the control group, and D/PCr rates in the PUF-C and P-2 groups were lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). However, D/D0(glucose) was higher and D/P(Cr)was lower in the MSC-2 group than in the PUF-C and P-2 groups (P < 0.05). Transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) levels were lower in the MSC groups than in the P and PUF-C groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The PUF-C group had a high permeability UFF. These results showed that MSC transplantation exerted positive effects on UFF in a chronic rat model of PD. MSC transplantation may provide new options for the renewal of the peritoneum in chronic PD patients with UFF.