ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and impact of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) on tumor characterization and response to radiochemotherapy (RCT) in patients with esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 patients underwent DCE-MRI to assess tumor microcirculation based on a two-compartment model function. Effects of RCT on kinetic parameters were studied in 12 patients with squamous cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Tumor microcirculation differs with respect to histological subtype: squamous cell carcinomas showed lower values of amplitude A (leakage space, P = 0.015) and higher contrast agent exchange rates (k(21), P = 0.225) compared with adenocarcinomas. RCT led to a significant decrease of the contrast agent exchange rate (P = 0.005), while amplitude A increased moderately after therapy (P = 0.136). CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI is feasible in patients with esophageal cancer, reveals therapeutic effects, and may thus be useful in therapy management and monitoring.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/blood supply , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/blood supply , Contrast Media/pharmacokinetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/blood supply , Image Enhancement/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gadolinium DTPA/administration & dosage , Gadolinium DTPA/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Male , Microcirculation , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and helical CT for endoleak detection. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with nitinol stent-grafts. Follow-up data sets included contrast-enhanced biphasic CT and MRI within 48 hr after the intervention; at 3, 6, and 12 months; and yearly thereafter. The endoleak size was categorized as < or = 3%, > 3% < or = 10%, > 10% < or = 30%, or > 30% of the maximum cross-sectional aneurysm area. A consensus interpretation of CT and MRI was defined as the standard of reference. RESULTS: Of 252 data sets, 141 showed evidence for endoleaks. The incidence of types I, II, and III endoleaks and complex endoleaks was 3.2%, 40.1%, 8.7%, and 4.0%, respectively. The sensitivity for endoleak detection was 92.9%, 44.0%, 34.8%, and 38.3% for MRI, biphasic CT, uniphasic arterial CT, and uniphasic late CT, respectively. The corresponding negative predictive values were 91.7%, 58.4%, 54.7%, and 56.1%, respectively. The overall accuracy of endoleak detection and correct sizing was 95.2%, 58.3%, 55.6%, and 57.1% for MRI, biphasic CT, uniphasic arterial CT, and uniphasic late CT, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI is significantly superior to biphasic CT for endoleak detection and rating of endoleak size, followed by uniphasic late and uniphasic arterial CT scans. MRI shows a significant number of endoleaks in cases with negative CT findings and may help illuminate the phenomenon of endotension. Endoleak rates reported after endovascular aneurysm repair substantially depend on the imaging techniques used.
