NITES, a nocturnal bladder score to aid diagnosis during the transition to older age care.

BACKGROUND: As adults transition to older age, bothersome nocturnal lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) become common. There is need for a reliable assessment metric to detect and measure specific symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To subject the nocturnal LUTS score for older individuals, Nocturia, Incontinence, Toileting and Enuresis Symptom Score (NITES), to psychometric analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Factor analysis of the metric was conducted with completed questionnaires from 151 older individuals who were either admitted to a tertiary hospital or attending an outpatient continence clinic. Test re-test reliability involved 18 older community dwelling individuals attending a Geriatrician clinic completing the metric at two timepoints separated by at least 1 week. Intra-class correlation coefficients were determined for reliability of each factor and item. RESULTS: The NITES metric was completed by 98 hospitalized older individuals and 53 attending a continence clinic (mean age 83.2 years [SD 7.0]). Factor analysis demonstrated that one item had a floor effect and two items had poor endorsement. After test re-test reliability analysis, a further three items were removed: one due to poor correlation between timepoints and two demonstrating inadequate internal consistency. The final NITES metric is comprised of three factors: Sleep 4-items, Incontinence 4-items, and Personal Bother 2-items. A 4-item short form for symptom screening was extracted from the longer measure. CONCLUSION: The final NITES metric is a 10-item questionnaire with an embedded 4-item short symptom screen. It has utility utilized to detect nocturnal bladder symptoms in both community dwelling and hospitalized older adults.

"How Do I Test the Waters? How Do I Go Forward?": Codesigning a Supportive Pathway after Critical Illness.

Rationale: Long-term recovery after critical illness can be affected by post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), a significant burden, which can impact return to activities and work. There is a need for streamlined support for intensive care unit (ICU) patients in their recovery while enduring PICS symptoms. Objectives: To explore critical illness recovery from the experiences, perspectives, and beliefs of former ICU patients, their caregivers, and multidisciplinary clinicians to design a future rehabilitation intervention prototype to support ICU patients. Methods: This was an experience-based codesign (EBCD) study underpinned by the Behavior Change Wheel framework involving ICU patients (<5 years after illness), caregivers, and multidisciplinary clinicians with current clinical experience with ICU recovery at any point along the care continuum (ICU, acute, subacute, or community settings) from two metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Two rounds of experience-based codesign workshops were held between August 2021 and February 2022. Workshop content was analyzed via a reflective thematic approach to determine themes and develop an intervention. The intervention was mapped according to the template for intervention description and replication framework. Results: Forty people participated in the codesign process: 15 ICU patients, 2 caregivers, and 23 clinicians. Fifteen major themes were identified in the experience of ICU recovery. Returning home was a key time point for change, acceptance, and adjustment, with the burden of physical limitations and mental health problems becoming apparent. Most participants expressed that PICS was poorly understood in the community, and there was a lack of support to aid recovery. Based on these results, an intervention prototype was developed with a primary goal of improving care after hospital discharge. This was further refined in the second round of workshops. A resource toolkit was deemed most acceptable to end-users, including a hospital-directed support program involving psychology and physical therapy and an accompanying digital health package. Conclusions: A critical time point for more support in the recovery journey was the transition from hospital to home. To address this, a rehabilitation prototype including a physical and psychological support intervention and supporting digital health toolkit was codesigned. The intervention package will be developed and trialed with future ICU patients and their families. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05044221).

Can gait outcomes be predicted early after a stroke?

PURPOSE: To determine the ability of clinical measures collected within 72 hours of neurological insult to predict independent gait 6 and 12 months after a stroke. METHODS: Patients with a confirmed stroke diagnosis were eligible for inclusion in this prospective cohort study. Sitting balance, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) motor leg, NIHSS motor arm, and Motricity Index (MI) were measured within 72 hours post-stroke. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 6 and 12 months post-stroke to measure gait recovery. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were included at baseline for analysis. At 6 and 12 months, 38% (n = 38) and 35% (n = 42) of patients used a gait aid, and 80% and 87% were independently ambulant, respectively. Sitting balance, NIHSS motor leg, and NIHSS motor arm were not significantly associated with ambulation at 6 or 12 months or with the use of a gait aid. Thrombolysis was significantly associated with independent outdoors ambulation at 6 months (p = .011). A worse MI score was significantly associated with a higher number of falls at 6 months (p < .010) but not with the need for a gait aid. The number of falls at 6 months was independently predicted by urinary incontinence post-stroke (p < .001), NIHSS leg score (p < .005), and depression and anxiety while in acute care (p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical bedside assessments may be less important in predicting safe, independent gait than previously thought. Urinary incontinence and poor mental health should be addressed in the hospital. Increased utilization of reperfusion techniques may alter functional recovery patterns.

The Bladder at Night during Hospitalisation: Towards optimal care for elderly patients with nocturia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the characteristics of nocturia in older hospitalised patients and to explore knowledge, beliefs and experiences associated with night toileting while in hospital in order to identify unmet care needs. METHODS: A multisite mixed methods cross-sectional study of older hospitalised adults who were admitted for ≥2 days was conducted using a standardised researcher-administered questionnaire. An additional cohort 16 older hospitalised adults with nocturia >twice per night were interviewed to understand the experience and impact of nocturia during hospitalisation. RESULTS: Nocturia was experienced by 260 out of 308 participants. In-hospital nocturia was significantly correlated with nocturia in the month preceding admission, high diurnal voiding frequency and nocturnal urinary urgency. Bother was attributed to multiple nocturia episodes. Participants had poor knowledge and understanding of nocturia and believed the symptom to be a normal occurrence; only 20% had discussed management with staff. Disrupted sleep and fear of falling were common in older immobile participants with nocturia. CONCLUSION: Nocturia is highly prevalent in hospitalised older people. Toileting multiple times at night bothers patients, disrupts sleep, heightens a fear of falling yet is rarely addressed in ward management plans. A screening process to identify, assess, provide education and intervene for nocturia has the potential to improve wellbeing, safety at night and to address risk factors.