ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the neonatal results of low weight neonates born by cesarean and vaginal delivery. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Maternity of Hospital - Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: The analysis included the neonates born alive, of unique pregnancy, <2000 g from October 1999 to July 2013. To obtain the information about the neonatal period, as well as their Apgar score in the 1st and 5th min of life, a search in the database of a neonatal intensive care unit was performed. RESULTS: In total, 830 neonates were included as per the study criteria. Of these, 519 (62.5%) were born by cesarean delivery and 311 (37.5%) by vaginal delivery. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of neonatal complications, with better results in the neonates born by vaginal delivery, except for the group with neonates <1500 g. In this group, there was a higher incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and death before discharge from the hospital. There was also a higher incidence of respiratory distress syndrome and intraventricular hemorrhage in neonates born by vaginal delivery, in all weight groups. Comparing the Apgar scores, there was a statistically significant difference between the delivery modes, with better results observed in the ones born by vaginal delivery. However, the opposite was observed in the group with neonates <1000 g. CONCLUSION: There was no indication of cesarean delivery benefits in neonates 1000-2000 g. However, the opposite was observed when the neonates were <1000 g.
