Early experience of a local pathway on the waiting time for MRI in patients presenting to a UK district general hospital with suspected cauda equina syndrome.

AIM: This study evaluated the impact of the Salisbury Protocol for Assessment of Cauda Equina Syndrome (SPACES) on the waiting time for MRI in patients presenting with suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome (sCES) within a UK district general hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing an MRI scan in our hospital, for sCES, over a 12 month period, prior to and following the introduction of SPACES, were identified. Patient's gender, age, MRI diagnosis, time from MRI request to imaging and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: In the year prior to the introduction of SPACES, 66 patients underwent MRI for sCES, out of which 10.6% had cauda equina compression (CEC), 63.5% had other spinal pathology and 25% had a normal scan. In the year after introduction of SPACES, 160 patients underwent MRI for sCES out of which 6.2% had CEC, 70.7% had other spinal pathology and 23% had a normal scan. Despite the referrals for sCES increasing by more than 2-fold following the introduction of SPACES, the median time from MRI request to scan decreased from 9.1 to 4.2 hours (p = 0.106, Mann-Whitney-U) and the number of patients transferred to the regional hub hospital decreased from 7 to 3. CONCLUSION: Implementation of SPACES for patients with sCES resulted in a substantial reduction in waiting time for MRI and decreased the number of transfers to the regional hub hospital. Based on our early experience, we encourage other centres within the UK to introduce such a pathway locally, to improve the management of patients with sCES.

The 'three-legged stool': a system for spinal informed consent.

Many hospitals do not have a structured process of consent, the attainment of which can often be rather 'last-minute' and somewhat chaotic. This is a surprising state of affairs as spinal surgery is a high-risk surgical specialty with potential for expensive litigation claims. More recently, the Montgomery ruling by the United Kingdom Supreme Court has placed the subject of informed consent into the spotlight. There is a paucity of practical guidance on how a consent process can be achieved in a busy clinical setting. The British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS) has convened a working party to address this need. To our knowledge this is the first example of a national professional body, representing a single surgical specialty, taking such a fundamental initiative. In a hard-pressed clinical environment, the ability to achieve admission reliably on the day of surgery, in patients at ease with their situation and with little likelihood of late cancellation, will be of great benefit. It will reduce litigation and improve the patient experience. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1427-30.

Comparison of three types of lumbar osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis: a case series and evolution of a safe technique for instrumented reduction.

INTRODUCTION: The principles of correction of thoraco-lumbar kyphotic deformity (TKLD) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are essentially centred on lordosing osteotomies such as pedicle subtraction closing wedge osteotomy (CWO), polysegmental posterior lumbar wedge osteotomies (PWO) and Smith Peterson's open wedge osteotomy (OWO) of the lumbar spine. There have been no studies that compared the results of the three osteotomies performed by a single surgeon with a long-term follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 31 patients with AS was performed: 12 patients underwent CWO, 10 had OWO, and 9 had PWO. Radiographic assessment was performed at 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks and annually thereafter. Clinical assessment included blood loss, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and surgical time recordings. All patients were assessed clinically at regular intervals and outcome measures recorded included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, and SRS-22 (recorded in 23 patients). RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 54.7 years (40-74 years) and mean duration of symptoms was 3 years (range, 5-8 years). Mean follow-up was 5 years (range, 2-10 years). There was no statistically significant difference between the three techniques with regard to mean duration of surgery and ICU stay. The mean duration of surgery was 7 h (range, 4-9 h) (OWO cases had shorter period than CWO and PWO cases, and the longest period was for CWO cases). The mean ICU stay was 3 days (range, 2-20 days) (the period of stay was shorter in general for OWO and slightly longer for CWO and PWO). Blood loss was expressed as percentage of estimated blood volume (EBV). The mean blood loss in PWO was 23 ± 15.4% (range, 9-36%), CWO was 28 ± 4.5% (range, 12-40%) and in OWO was 15 ± 11% (range, 13-99%). Mean correction of kyphosis was 38° (range, 25°-49°) with CWO, 28° with OWO (range, 24°-38°) and 30° with PWO (range, 28°-40°). In comparison to preoperative scores, statistically significant improvement was noted in all three groups in the postoperative period with regard to ODI, VAS and SRS-22 (p = 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSION: Better radiographic correction was noted in the CWO and PWO groups, although this was associated with increased blood loss, multiple levels of instrumentation, and increased surgical time compared to OWO. A new safe technique of instrumentation using temporary malleable rods to prevent sagittal translation during the reduction manoeuvre is also described.

Objective functional assessment of total hip arthroplasty following two common surgical approaches: the posterior and direct lateral approaches.

Despite the high number of total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures performed each year, there is no common consensus on the best surgical approach. Gait is known to improve following THA although it does not return to what is typically quantified as normal, and surgical approach is believed to be a contributing factor. The current study evaluates postoperative hip function and provides an objective assessment following two common surgical approaches: the McFarland-Osborne direct lateral and the southern posterior. Faced with the common problem of providing an objective comparison from the wealth of data collected using motion analysis techniques, the current study investigates the application of an objective classification tool to provide information on the effectiveness of each surgery and to differentiate between the characteristics of hip function following the two approaches. Seven inputs for the classifier were determined through statistical analysis of the biomechanical data. The posterior approach group exhibited greater characteristics of non-pathological gait and displayed a greater range of functional ability as compared with the lateral approach cohort. The classification tool has proved to be successful in characterizing non-pathological and THA function but was insufficient in distinguishing between the two surgical cohorts.

Cauda equina syndrome: an anatomically driven review.

Cauda equina syndrome results from an injury to the lumbosacral nerve roots below the tip of the conus medullaris, occuring in between 2 and 6% of all laminectomies performed for lumbar disc herniation. This article relates the anatomy of the nervous system of the bladder, rectum, anus and sexual organs to the signs and symptoms of cauda equina syndrome, and reviews the literature for the acute management of these patients.

Clostridial wound infection following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patella-bone autograft.

A 27-year-old rugby player underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, using autograft. Postoperatively, septic arthritis was missed due to atypical presentation but diagnosed 2 days later and underwent open arthrotomy and lavage, He received antibiotics for 5 weeks. Aspirate showed clostridium perfringens. Later, extension lag was developed, which improved by arthroscopic excision of fibrous tissue and adhesions. The source of clostridial contamination remained a mystery. Skin preparation can be ineffective in eradicating clostridium perfringens prior to procedures. Routine prophylactic use of metronidazole would be controversial. In patients with postoperative infections, we suggest that samples should be routinely sent for anaerobic cultures.

How accurate is partial weightbearing?

The accuracy of partial weightbearing was assessed in six healthy volunteers and 23 patients who had sustained either a fracture of a lower limb or surgery. They were trained to weightbear partially using the conventional bathroom scale method and were assessed in a gait laboratory using force platforms. The amount of weight exerted on the involved limb during three-point crutch walking was determined. Four of six volunteers exerted a mean of 27% of body weight more than required. The remaining two volunteers exerted a mean of 8.5% of body weight less than required. Of the 23 patients, 21 exerted a mean of 35.3% of body weight more than that prescribed and two patients exerted a mean of 11.97% of body weight less than that prescribed. In both groups there was little relationship between the weightbearing prescribed and actual weightbearing. None of the patients or volunteers was able to reproduce the extent of partial weightbearing for which they were trained using the bathroom scale method, confirming that this technique of instructing patients in partial weightbearing is inaccurate.

Transient pulmonary embolism during impaction bone grafting of the femur.

We report a case of pulmonary embolism occurring transiently during impaction of morsellized bone graft in the femoral medullary canal as a part of revision hip arthroplasty. To our knowledge this complication has not yet been reported during impaction bone grafting. Increased awareness would lead to use of monitoring devices and early intervention during revision hip surgery. (Hip International 2004; 14: 48-50).