Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(35): 5448-5472, 2023 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37820295

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS: Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Medical Oncology/methods , Ontario , Quality of Life , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/therapy
3.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(5): 1132-1146, 2023 02 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36521102

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other health care providers on immunotherapy and biomarker testing for head and neck cancers. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included survival, overall response, and locoregional control. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: The literature search identified 28 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS: When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address biomarker testing, first-line treatment regimens based on programmed death ligand-1 scores, immunotherapy in platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, immunotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and radiation therapy in combination with immunotherapy for treatment of local recurrence.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Biomarkers , Immunotherapy , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
4.
Ann Transl Med ; 7(20): 595, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31807576

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy is the new frontier in cancer medicine. This manuscript summarizes historical aspect of immunotherapy, particularly its pathway to drug approval as the main therapeutic modality used in clinical medicine. We will discuss the role of immunotherapy in treating various types of cancers and how the treatment landscape once dominated by chemotherapy is rapidly changing.

5.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol ; 17(11): 630-637, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851165

ABSTRACT

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) encompasses a rare group of malignancies arising from epithelial cells lining the biliary tree that connects the liver and gallbladder to the small intestine. Most patients present with advanced incurable disease that has a poor prognosis, and standard treatment options remain limited. Effective nontoxic treatment options for advanced CCA are needed. Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathways are crucial to cellular proliferation, cellular survival, and differentiation of many malignancies, but are especially relevant in CCA. The targeting of FGF/FGFR has become the most promising approach to treating patients with advanced/metastatic CCA. Here we review CCA, and discuss the promise of FGFR-directed therapy in advanced CCA.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cholangiocarcinoma/drug therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Treatment Outcome
6.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol ; 17(9): 518-523, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549973

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of various types of cancers in recent years. Since the US Food and Drug Administration approval of the anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 agent ipilimumab for late-stage melanoma in 2011, results from multiple clinical trials have proven the benefit of immunotherapy in the treatment of other cancers. However, therapeutic resistance to immunotherapy often develops. This has led investigators to combine immunotherapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in an attempt to improve outcomes. The benefit of the combination is believed to stem from stimulating and suppressing various immune pathways and is further aided by the abscopal effect, in which tumors respond to radiation therapy even in nonradiated metastatic sites. When combined with immunotherapy, radiation causes the tumor to act much like a vaccine by exposing the tumor antigens to activate the immune response. This article reviews the association between the immune system and cancer, as well as the additional systemic benefit that SBRT can have in patients with advanced-stage malignancies being treated with immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Melanoma/therapy , Radiosurgery , Antigens, Neoplasm/immunology , Humans , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/pathology , Neoplasm Staging
7.
J Clin Oncol ; 37(3): 239-253, 2019 01 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30523709

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the American Society of Hematology (ASH) developed an evidence-based guideline on the initial diagnostic work-up of acute leukemia (AL). Because of the relevance of this topic to the ASCO membership, ASCO reviewed the guideline and applied a set of procedures and policies for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. METHODS: The CAP-ASH guideline on initial diagnostic work-up of AL was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. Then, an ASCO Endorsement Expert Panel updated the literature search and reviewed the content and recommendations. RESULTS: The ASCO Expert Panel determined that the recommendations from the guideline, published in 2016, are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO fully endorsed the CAP-ASH guideline on initial diagnostic work-up of AL and included some discussion points according to clinical practice and updated literature. CONCLUSION: Twenty-seven guideline statements were reviewed. Some discussion points were included to better assess CNS involvement in leukemia and to provide novel insights into molecular diagnosis and potential markers for risk stratification and target therapy. These discussions are categorized into four sections: (1) initial diagnosis focusing on basic diagnostics and determination of risk parameters, (2) molecular markers and minimal residual disease detection, (3) context of referral to another institution with expertise in the management of AL, and (4) reporting and record keeping for better outlining and follow-up discussion. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/hematologic-malignancies-guidelines .


Subject(s)
Leukemia/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Hematology/methods , Hematology/standards , Humans , Leukemia/pathology , Pathology/methods , Pathology/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic
8.
Target Oncol ; 9(3): 183-93, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24243495

ABSTRACT

Prior to 2005, the treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were limited. There has been a proliferation of agents since the introduction of sorafenib, sunitinib, and becavicumab for clinical use in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Recently, four new agents have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in mRCC. These agents come from two unique targeted pathways for RCC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. This review examines the investigational evolution, phases of development, adverse event profiles, and future directions of pazopanib, axitinib, everolimus, and temsirolimus as well as new novel agents being explored in clinical trials for these targeted pathways.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...