Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 57(11): 5684-92, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23979731

ABSTRACT

Bacillus anthracis toxins can be neutralized by antibodies against protective antigen (PA), a component of anthrax toxins. Anthrivig (human anthrax immunoglobulin), also known as AIGIV, derived from plasma of humans immunized with BioThrax (anthrax vaccine adsorbed), is under development for the treatment of toxemia following exposure to anthrax spores. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of AIGIV was assessed in naive animals and healthy human volunteers, and the efficacy of AIGIV was assessed in animals exposed via inhalation to aerosolized B. anthracis spores. In the clinical study, safety, tolerability, and PK were evaluated in three dose cohorts (3.5, 7.1, and 14.2 mg/kg of body weight of anti-PA IgG) with 30 volunteers per cohort. The elimination half-life of AIGIV in rabbits, nonhuman primates (NHPs), and humans following intravenous infusion was estimated to be approximately 4, 12, and 24 days, respectively, and dose proportionality was observed. In a time-based treatment study, AIGIV protected 89 to 100% of animals when administered 12 h postexposure; however, a lower survival rate of 39% was observed when animals were treated 24 h postexposure, underscoring the need for early intervention. In a separate set of studies, animals were treated on an individual basis upon detection of a clinical sign or biomarker of disease, namely, a significant increase in body temperature (SIBT) in rabbits and presence of PA in the serum of NHPs. In these trigger-based intervention studies, AIGIV induced up to 75% survival in rabbits depending on the dose and severity of toxemia at the time of treatment. In NHPs, up to 33% survival was observed in AIGIV-treated animals. (The clinical study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00845650.).


Subject(s)
Anthrax Vaccines/administration & dosage , Anthrax/prevention & control , Antibodies, Bacterial/administration & dosage , Bacillus anthracis/drug effects , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/pharmacokinetics , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Spores, Bacterial/drug effects , Animals , Anthrax/immunology , Anthrax/microbiology , Anthrax/mortality , Anthrax Vaccines/immunology , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Antibodies, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Antigens, Bacterial/blood , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Bacillus anthracis/immunology , Bacillus anthracis/pathogenicity , Bacterial Toxins/blood , Bacterial Toxins/immunology , Biomarkers/analysis , Double-Blind Method , Female , Half-Life , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/immunology , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/isolation & purification , Infusions, Intravenous , Macaca fascicularis , Male , Rabbits , Respiratory Tract Infections/immunology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/mortality , Spores, Bacterial/immunology , Spores, Bacterial/pathogenicity , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Vaccination
2.
Vaccine ; 31(30): 3051-8, 2013 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23701746

ABSTRACT

A new anthrax vaccine that could accelerate the immune response and possibly reduce the number of injections needed for protection would be desirable in a post-exposure setting. This Phase 1 study compared the safety and immunogenicity of 2 IM doses (Days 0 and 14) of 4 formulations of AV7909 (AVA plus CPG 7909) with 2 IM doses of BioThrax(®) (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed) and 2 IM doses of saline placebo administered on Days 0 and 14. A total of 105 healthy adults 18-50 years of age were randomized to 1 of 6 study groups: BioThrax (0.5 mL), AV7909 Formulation 1 (0.5 mL AVA+0.5mg CPG 7909), AV7909 Formulation 2 (0.5 mL AVA+0.25mg CPG 7909), AV7909 Formulation 3 (0.25 mL AVA+0.5mg CPG 7909), AV7909 Formulation 4 (0.25 mL AVA+0.25mg CPG 7909), or saline placebo (0.5 mL). All randomized subjects received at least 1 vaccination, and 100 subjects completed the trial. After 2 doses, mean peak normalized toxin neutralizing antibody responses (TNA NF50) in the AV7909 groups were higher than in the BioThrax group. Differences among the 4 AV7909 groups were not statistically significant. Subjects who received AV7909 reached peak titers on Day 28 vs. Day 35 in the BioThrax group. The most common adverse events (AEs) in the BioThrax and AV7909 groups assessed as related to vaccination were injection site reactions. Transient lymphopenia was observed after the first dose in each AV7909 group. Frequencies of injection site and systemic reactions recorded by subjects in diaries for 7 days after each injection were highest with AV7909 Formulation 1. No AEs of special interest (autoimmune events) were observed in the study. Further studies of doses and dosing regimens are planned to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of AV7909.


Subject(s)
Anthrax Vaccines/immunology , Anthrax/prevention & control , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Anthrax Vaccines/administration & dosage , Anthrax Vaccines/adverse effects , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antigens, Bacterial/blood , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides/administration & dosage , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides/adverse effects , Volunteers , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...