Comparison of injuries between US Army paratroopers and their non-paratrooper soldier counterparts.

INTRODUCTION: Military studies have investigated acute injuries associated with parachute jumps, but the literature does not address paratroopers' cumulative microtraumatic (CMT) injury risk, nor does it compare injury risks between paratroopers and the rest of the military population. This study determined whether US active duty Army paratroopers experienced greater injury risks than their non-paratrooper soldier counterparts and whether their injuries cost more to treat suggesting greater injury severity. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated electronic medical records (2016-2018) for 31 621 paratroopers and a randomly selected comparison group of 170 715 non-paratrooper soldiers. Analyses included univariate and multivariate regression to quantify odds of injuries associated with risk variables and additional descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Paratroopers had a 57% increase in the odds of experiencing one or more injuries (OR=1.57, 95% CI: 1.52 to 1.62) after controlling for sex, race and age, with a greater proportion of acute injuries (OR=1.38, 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.42), relative to comparison group soldiers. Injury types proportionally higher among paratroopers included head trauma and shoulder injuries. Average injury cost among paratroopers was 13% lower than for non-paratroopers ($2470 vs $2830 per injury). Among both populations, acute injury costs were notably higher than for CMT injuries (paratroopers, $1710/$630; non-paratroopers, $1860/$880 per injury). CONCLUSIONS: Paratroopers were more likely to incur injury, especially an acute injury, than non-paratroopers. However, paratroopers' average injury costs were less. This may be due to higher return-to-duty motivations, fitness levels, and/or facility-specific cost of care. Future studies should investigate causes of injuries found to be proportionally higher among paratroopers.

Antibacterial Activities of Jatropha curcas (LINN) on Coliforms Isolated from Surface Waters in Akure, Nigeria.

This study investigated the antibacterial activities of hot water, ethanol and acetone extracts of Jatropha curcas (LINN) leaves on coliforms isolated from surface waters using growth inhibition indices based on agar plate technique. The percentage recovery of the extracts was 19.17%, 18.10% and 18.80% for hot water, ethanol and acetone respectively. Phytochemical screening of the extracts was also determined. Qualitative phytochemical screening showed that the plant extracts contained steroids, tannins, flavonoids and cardiac glycosides, while alkaloids, phlobatannin, terpenoids and anthraquinones were absent. Only ethanolic extract did not possess saponins. Aqueous extracts of J. curcas compared most favourably with the standard antibiotics (gentamycin) on all the coliform bacteria except on K. pneumoniae and E. coli likely due to a measurably higher antibacterial activity compared to the organic extracts. The minimum inhibitory concentration of the aqueous extract ranged from 3.00 to 7.00 mg/L while minimum bactericidal concentration ranged from 4.00 to 10.00 mg/L. Aqueous extract of J. curcas could be used as antibacterial agents against diseases caused by coliforms.

Observations on the epidemiology of human taeniasis amongst the Goemai tribe of northern Nigeria.

A study on the epidemiology of human taeniasis amongst the Goemai tribe of Kwande rural community of Qua'an Pan Local Government Area carried out between January and June, 1991 is reported. 115 or 11.5% of the 1,000 persons examined were infected. Of the 614 males and 386 females examined, 77 (12.5%) and 38 (9.9%) respectively had infections. No significant difference in prevalence rates was recorded between the sexes and age groups. Infection was significantly higher (P < 0.05) among farmers than other occupational categories, and in those eating half roasted/cooked meat than in persons eating well-cooked meat. Other epidemiological factors relating to type of toilet facilities used as well as some socio-cultural and traditional beliefs of Goemai people which encourage host-parasite contact and their implications for public health are discussed. Suggestions are made for the control of human taeniasis in the community.