Prenatal Prognosis of Omphalocele Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement of Fetal Lung Volumes.

BACKGROUND: Omphalocele is a congenital midline abdominal wall defect resulting in herniation of viscera into a membrane-covered sac. Pulmonary complications, including pulmonary hypoplasia, pulmonary hypertension, and prolonged respiratory support are a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE(S): This study aimed to assess the role of fetal MRI-derived lung volumes and omphalocele defect size as clinical tools to prognosticate postnatal pulmonary morbidity and neonatal mortality in those with a prenatally diagnosed omphalocele (PDO). STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all pregnancies with PDO at our fetal center from 2007-2023. Pregnancies with aneuploidy or concurrent life-limiting fetal anomalies were excluded. Using fetal MRI, observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (O/E TLV) ratios were determined by a previously published method. The transverse diameter of the abdominal defect was also measured. The O/E TLV ratios and abdominal defect measurements were compared with postnatal outcomes. The primary outcome was death at any time. Secondary outcomes included death in the first 30 days of life or before discharge from birth hospitalization, the requirement of respiratory support with intubation and mechanical ventilation, or development of pulmonary hypertension. RESULTS: Of 101 pregnancies with a PDO, 54 pregnancies (53.5%) with prenatally diagnosed omphalocele met inclusion criteria. There was a significant increase in the rate of death when compared between the three O/E TLV classifications: 1/36 (2.8%) in the O/E ≥ 50% group, 3/14 (21.4%) in the O/E 25 - 49.9% group, and 4/4 (100%) in the O/E < 25% group (p < 0.001). The rate of intubation increased with the severity of O/E TLV classification, with 27.8% in the O/E ≥ 50% group, 64.3% in the O/E 25 - 49.9% group, and 100% in the O/E < 25% group (p = 0.003). The rate of pulmonary hypertension was also higher in the O/E 25 - 49.9% (50.0%) and the O/E < 25% (50.0%) groups compared to the O/E ≥ 50% group (8.3%, p = 0.002). There was no association between the transverse diameter of the abdominal wall defect and the primary outcome of death (OR = 1.08 95% CI = [0.65-1.78], p=0.77). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients with PDO, O/E TLV <50% is associated with death, need for intubation, prolonged intubation, and pulmonary hypertension. In contrast, omphalocele size demonstrated no prognostic value for these outcomes. The strong association between low fetal lung volume on MRI and poor neonatal outcomes highlights the utility of fetal MRI for estimating postnatal prognosis. Clinicians can utilize fetal lung volumes to direct perinatal counseling and optimize the plan of care.

Limited Role of MSAFP Screening for Prenatal Omphalocele Detection.

OBJECTIVES: Although serum screening for aneuploidies has become less prevalent, maternal-serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) screening for body-wall defects remains widespread. We explored whether MSAFP screening is associated with earlier omphalocele detection than ultrasound alone. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of prenatally detected omphalocele cases at our center from 2007 to 2023. We explored the association between MSAFP screening, gestational age at omphalocele detection, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Among 101 pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed omphalocele, 27 (26.7%) had MSAFP screening. The median gestational age at MSAFP screening was 17 weeks 4 days. Of those who received MSAFP screening, 11 (41%) had values ≥2.5 multiples of the median (MoM) and 16 (59%) were not elevated. MSAFP results did not correlate with omphalocele size and were not associated with prenatal or postnatal outcomes. MSAFP screening did not result in earlier suspicion for or confirmation of omphalocele (P = .97 and P = .87, respectively). In contrast, first-trimester ultrasound screening was associated with earlier suspicion for and confirmation of omphalocele (P < .01 and P = .01, respectively). There were no clinical or demographic differences between those who received MSAFP screening and those who did not (including body mass index or commute distance to an urban center). CONCLUSION: MSAFP screening is not associated with earlier omphalocele detection. Furthermore, in pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed omphalocele, the results of MSAFP screening are not predictive of clinical outcomes.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination and Assisted Reproduction Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and female assisted reproduction outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline (OVID), EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov on January 11, 2023, for original articles on assisted reproduction outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination. The primary outcome was rates of clinical pregnancy; secondary outcomes included number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live-birth rate. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently screened citations for relevance, extracted pertinent data, and rated study quality. Only peer-reviewed published studies were included. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Our query retrieved 216 citations, of which 25 were studies with original, relevant data. Nineteen studies reported embryo transfer outcomes, with a total of 4,899 vaccinated and 13,491 unvaccinated patients. Eighteen studies reported data on ovarian stimulation outcomes, with a total of 1,878 vaccinated and 3,174 unvaccinated patients. There were no statistically significant results among our pooled data for any of the primary or secondary outcomes: clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.01, P =.10), number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference -0.26, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.15, P =.21), number of mature oocytes retrieved (mean difference 0.31, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.75, P =.18), fertilization rate (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.11, P =.83), implantation rate (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-1.00, P =.06), ongoing pregnancy rate (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.06, P =.40), or live-birth rate (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78-1.17, P =.63). A subanalysis based on country of origin and vaccine type was also performed for the primary and secondary outcomes and did not change the study results. CONCLUSION: Vaccination against COVID-19 is not associated with different fertility outcomes in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42023400023.