Acute hemodynamic benefit of left ventricular apex pacing in children.

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that pacing at the right ventricular apex acutely and chronically decreases left ventricular contractile function, this pacing site is still conventionally used in adults and children. Because animal studies showed beneficial effects of left ventricular pacing, we compared the hemodynamic performance of left ventricular apex, left ventricular free wall, and right ventricular apex pacing in children. METHODS: Studies were performed in 10 children (median age, 2.5 years; range, 2 months to 17 years) undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease with normal systemic left ventricular anatomy and intraventricular conduction. High-fidelity left ventricular and arterial pressure measurements were performed during epicardial right ventricular apex and left ventricular apex and free wall pacing. RESULTS: Left ventricular apex pacing increased the maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure and pulse pressure significantly relative to right ventricular apex pacing (by 7.7% +/- 7.2% and 7.7% +/- 7.0%, respectively) without changes in end-diastolic left ventricular pressure. Left ventricular free wall pacing did not significantly improve hemodynamics as compared with right ventricular apex pacing. The QRS duration was not different among pacing at the three sites. CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term study left ventricular apex pacing is hemodynamically superior to right ventricular apex and left ventricular free wall pacing in children. Therefore, the left ventricular apex appears a favorable pacing site after pediatric cardiac surgery.

The left ventricular apex is the optimal site for pediatric pacing: correlation with animal experience.

Pacing at the commonly used right ventricular (RV) apex results in impaired ventricular performance. Previous animal studies indicated that the left ventricular (LV) apex is a superior pacing site. The purpose of this study was to investigate in dogs whether this good performance is associated with a more synchronous electrical activation pattern of the LV and whether the LV apex is also a good pacing site in children. In 11 healthy dogs and 8 children undergoing cardiac surgery, dual chamber pacing was performed at the RV apex, LV apex and LV lateral free wall (LVFW). In dogs, a basket electrode was inserted into the LV to assess pattern and timing of LV endocardial activation. In the children, hemodynamic measurements were performed immediately after recovery from cardiopulmonary bypass. In dogs, LV apex pacing resulted in synchronous activation around the LV circumference whereas RV apex and LVFW pacing resulted in asynchrony of activation between the septum and LVFW. In both canine and children's hearts most hemodynamic variables remained at sinus rhythm level during LV apex pacing, but LVdPdtmax, stroke work (dogs), and pulse pressure (children) were reduced as compared with sinus rhythm during RV apex and LVFW pacing. LV apex pacing results in synchronous activation of the LV and is, in adult dogs and in children, associated with superior hemodynamic performance.