Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Chemother ; 14(1): 59-64, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11892901

ABSTRACT

Correct antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the incidence of postoperative infections. 600 questionnaires on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis were sent to Italian Surgical Departments. Each questionnaire included a series of 17 multi-choice-questions concerning the specific approach of the department to: organization, type, timing, duration, auditing of prophylaxis. 435 departments (72.5%) responded to the questionnaire; 50 of these were blank, so 385 out of 435 (88.5%) were suitable for statistical evaluation. Results were as follows: 90.5% of departments perform some form of prophylaxis under the control, in 90.5% of cases, of surgeons; 89.3% differentiate antibiotics according to class of operation; 67.4% give the antibiotic preoperatively and prefer i.v. injection (61.0%), mostly in the ward (56.2%); in 33.3% of cases the prophylaxis is standard (more than 2 doses), but 55.8% of Italian surgeons do not give a boost-dose in operations longer than 3 h; 54.2% of patients receive a cephalosporin (mostly III generation), with a rotation of molecules in 53.9% of cases; 71.7% of departments register the incidence of infections, but only 43.2% control the patients 30 days after surgery; finally, 54.2% of departments work together with a bacteriology laboratory active 24 hours, while in 81.7% of cases the hospital has an Infection Committee which meets together usually without a programmed date (60.3%). In conclusion, antibiotic prophylaxis in Italian Surgery Departments appears adequate, even though some problems still remain regarding time-dose-duration-schedule, rotation of molecules, excess of cephalosporins, availability of a 24-h bacteriological laboratory and infection surveillance after discharge.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Cytometry ; 42(1): 27-34, 2000 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10679740

ABSTRACT

In order to determine retrospectively the impact of some cytometric and immunohistochemical parameters on the overall survival of gastric cancer patients treated with surgery alone, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 137 gastric carcinoma patients undergoing curative resection from 1987-1993 were analyzed by flow cytometry (FCM) and immunohistochemistry (p53, c-erbB-2, and PCNA expression). FCM-derived parameters were DNA ploidy and fraction of S-phase cells (SPF). Multiple regression analysis was applied to determine the prognostic significance of the conventional clinicopathologic findings together with the flow cytometric and immunohistochemical parameters on overall survival. When all parameters were entered simultaneously into the Cox regression model, stage and DNA ploidy (DNA index >1.35) clearly emerged as the only independent prognostic factors. When the stages were analysed separately, the independent prognostic factors resulted DNA ploidy in early stages (I-II) and grading in stage IIIA tumors. For stage IIIB tumors, no independent prognostic factor was found. These results indicate that the DNA ploidy pattern is a valuable predictor of survival in curatively resected gastric cancer patients, especially when less advanced tumors are taken into consideration.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma/metabolism , Carcinoma/pathology , DNA/analysis , Female , Flow Cytometry , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Ploidies , Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen/analysis , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Analysis , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/analysis
4.
J Surg Oncol Suppl ; 3: 154-7, 1993.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7684913

ABSTRACT

Extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) tumors often become symptomatic in an advanced stage when curative resection is seldom possible. In a group of 111 patients, 7 (6.3%) received no treatment, 32 (28.8%) underwent non-operative biliary drainage (NOD), and 72 (64.8%) underwent surgical exploration. Radical resection was possible in only 25 cases (34.7%); 14 patients (19.4%) underwent a biliary digestive bypass (BDB), 15 (20.8%) received a transtumoral biliary prosthesis (TBP), and 18 (25.0%) an external biliary drainage (EBD). Average survival rates were: 6.5 months after BDB, 4.0 months after TBP, and 2.8 months after EBD. In a second group of 2,066 patients with primary and secondary malignant obstruction of the upper EHBD, treated with the insertion of a Carey-Coons transhepatic transtumoral biliary prosthesis, the average survival was 4.3 months. The early morbidity rate was 0.6%. Obstruction of the prosthesis occurred in 91 patients (4.4%), and the late morbidity rate was 3.6%. Although EHBD tumor treatment results are generally poor, surgical exploration should be performed in all patients with acceptable surgical risk, and without evidence of disseminated disease. When resection of the tumor is not feasible, we favor the use of a BDB or of a biliary prosthesis over that of an external drainage. In poor risk cases or cases with evidence of disseminated disease, we prefer the placement of an internal prosthesis (PTBD or endoscopic.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Cholestasis, Extrahepatic/surgery , Palliative Care , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastomosis, Surgical , Bile Duct Neoplasms/complications , Bile Ducts/surgery , Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheterization/instrumentation , Cholestasis, Extrahepatic/etiology , Drainage , Equipment Failure , Female , Humans , Jejunum/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Prosthesis Failure , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...